Dataset Information

Systemic Profiling of KDM5 Subfamily Signature in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

ABSTRACT:

Background

Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, lung cancer is one of the most lethal human diseases, with a dismal 5-year relative survival rate of only 5% for patients diagnosed with advanced metastatic disease. Accumulating evidence supports that epigenetic aberration of histone demethylase-KDM5 subfamily is linked to human pan-cancer. However, the detailed functions of KDM5 proteins in lung cancer, especially in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), remain poorly understand.

Methods

UALCAN, GEPIA, Kaplan–Meier plotter, cBioPortal, TIMER, TISIDB, and STRING databases were utilized in this investigation.

Results

We detected varying degrees of gene mutations of KDM5 subfamily members and found that KDM5B/C were remarkably overexpressed in LUAD and LUSC compared to normal tissues. Different from KDM5D, positive relationship was shown between overall survival and mRNA expression of KDM5A/B/C in lung cancer. We determined that KDM5A/B/C expression levels were positively correlated with CD4+ T cells infiltration, especially immunological markers of Tregs and Th17 cells. Moreover, LUAD and LUSC were separately rich in inflammatory and wound healing subtypes after immunogenomics analyzing with respect to KDM5 subfamily overexpression. And with their 120 co-expressed genes, we revealed that nucleocytoplasmic transport and cellular protein localization-related genes were closely connected to KDM5 subfamily alterations, next to chromatin remodeling genes.

Conclusion

We formulated the immune-infiltrating and prognostic value of KDM5 subfamily and highlighted its promising role in immune-inflammatory interaction with tumour microenvironment in NSCLC.

SUBMITTER: Hao F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8558507 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Molecular profiling of NSCLC is essential for optimising treatment decisions, but often incomplete. We assessed the efficacy of protocolised molecular profiling in the current standard-of-care (SoC) in a prospective observational study in the Netherlands and measured the effect of providing standardised diagnostic procedures. We also explored the potential of plasma-based molecular profiling in the primary diagnostic setting. This multi-centre prospective study was designed to explore the performance of current clinical practice during the run-in phase using local SoC tissue profiling procedures. The subsequent phase was designed to investigate the extent to which comprehensive molecular profiling (CMP) can be maximized by protocolising tumour profiling. Successful molecular profiling was defined as completion of at least EGFR and ALK testing. Additionally, PD-L1 tumour proportions scores were explored. Lastly, the additional value of centralised plasma-based testing for EGFR and KRAS mutations using droplet digital PCR was evaluated. Total accrual was 878 patients, 22.0% had squamous cell carcinoma and 78.0% had non-squamous NSCLC. Stage I-III was seen in 54.0%, stage IV in 46.0%. Profiling of EGFR and ALK was performed in 69.9% of 136 patients included in the run-in phase, significantly more than real-world data estimates of 55% (p<0.001). Protocolised molecular profiling increased the rate to 77.0% (p = 0.049). EGFR and ALK profiling rates increased from 77.9% to 82.1% in non-squamous NSCLC and from 43.8% to 57.5% in squamous NSCLC. Plasma-based testing was feasible in 98.4% and identified oncogenic driver mutations in 7.1% of patients for whom tissue profiling was unfeasible. This study shows a high success rate of tissue-based molecular profiling that was significantly improved by a protocolised approach. Tissue-based profiling remains unfeasible for a substantial proportion of patients. Combined analysis of tumour tissue and circulating tumour DNA is a promising approach to allow adequate molecular profiling of more patients.