Dataset Information

A systematic review of neuropsychiatric and cognitive assessments used in clinical trials for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Up to 50% of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) experience cognitive dysfunction, whilst depression and anxiety are reported in up to 44% and 33%, respectively. These symptoms impact on quality of life, and are associated with a poorer prognosis. Historically, outcomes in clinical trials have focused on the effect of candidate drugs on physical functioning.

Methods

We reviewed the past 25 years of clinical trials of investigative medicinal products in people with ALS, since the licensing of riluzole, and extracted data on frequency and type of assessment for neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment. Trial registry databases, including WHO International Trials Registry, European Clinical Trials Register, clinicaltrials.gov, and PubMed, were systematically searched for Phase II, III or IV trials registered, completed or published between 01/01/1994 and 31/10/2019. No language restrictions were applied. Outcome measures, exclusion criteria and assessment tool used were extracted.

Results

216 trials, investigating 26,326 people with ALS, were reviewed. 35% assessed neuropsychiatric symptoms, and 22% assessed cognition, as Exclusion Criteria or Outcome Measures. 3% (n = 6) of trials assessed neuropsychiatric symptoms as a Secondary Outcome Measure, and 4% (n = 8) assessed cognition as Outcome Measures; only one trial included assessments for both cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms as Outcome Measures. Three ALS-specific assessments were used in six trials.

Conclusions

Trials for people with ALS have neglected the importance of neuropsychiatric symptoms and cognitive impairment. Evaluation of these extra-motor features is essential to understanding the impact of candidate drugs on all symptoms of ALS.

Propsero registration

CRD42020175612.

SUBMITTER: Beswick E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8563523 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:First- and second-degree relatives of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis report higher rates of neuropsychiatric disorders, indicating that risk genes may be pleiotropic, causing multiple phenotypes within kindreds. Such phenotypes may constitute a disease endophenotype that associates with disease liability. We have directly investigated cognitive functioning and neuropsychiatric traits among relatives of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis to identify potential endophenotypes of the disease. In a family-based, cross-sectional study design, first- and second-degree relatives of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 149) were compared to controls (n = 60) using an in-depth neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric assessment. Subgroup analyses examined the effect of family history and C9orf72 repeat expansion status (n = 16 positive carriers). Relatives of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis had lower scores on executive functioning, language and memory tasks compared to controls, with large effect sizes observed on object naming (d = 0.91, P = 0.00001) and phonemic verbal fluency (d = 0.81, P = 0.0003). Relatives also had higher autism quotient attention to detail traits (d = -0.52, P = 0.005), lower conscientiousness (d = 0.57, P = 0.003) and lower openness to experience personality traits (d = 0.54, P = 0.01) than controls. These effects were typically larger in relatives of people with familial, rather than sporadic, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and were present in both gene carrier and non-carrier relatives of probands with a C9orf72 repeat expansion. Poorer phonemic fluency and object naming, along with autism and personality traits, are more frequent in relatives of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Among kindreds carrying the C9orf72 repeat expansion, these traits were identified in relatives regardless of their carrier status, suggesting the presence of a disease-associated endophenotype that is not exclusively mediated by the C9orf72 expansion.

Project description:BackgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is increasingly recognised as a multi-system disorder, presenting with common and impactful non-motor symptoms, such as neuropsychiatric symtpoms, cognitive and behavioural changes, pain, disordered sleep, fatigue and problematic saliva.Aim/hypothesisWe aimed to systematically review 25 years of ALS clinical trials data to identify if non-motor features were evaluated, in addition to the traditional measures of motor functioning and survival, and where evaluated to describe the instruments used to assess. We hypothesised that assessment of non-motor symptoms has been largely neglected in trial design and not evaluated with ALS-suitable instruments.MethodsWe reviewed clinical trials of investigative medicinal products in ALS, since the licensing of riluzole in 1994. Trial registry databases including WHO International Trials Registry, European Clinical Trials Register, clinicaltrials.gov, and PubMed were systematically searched for Phase II, III or IV trials registered, completed or published between 01/01/1994 and 16/09/2020. No language restrictions were applied.Results237 clinical trials, including over 29,222 participants, were investigated for their use of non-motor outcome measures. These trials evaluated neuropsychiatric symptoms (75, 32%), cognitive impairment (16, 6.8%), behavioural change (34, 14%), pain (55, 23%), sleep disturbances (12, 5%) and fatigue (18, 8%). Problematic saliva was assessed as part of composite ALS-FRS(R) scores in 184 trials (78%) but with no focus on this as an isolated symptom. 31 (13%) trials including 3585 participants did not include any assessment of non-motor symptoms.ConclusionsNon-motor symptoms such as neuropsychiatric, cognitive and behavioural changes, pain, disordered sleep, fatigue, and problematic saliva have not been consistently evaluated in trials for people with ALS. Where evaluated, non-symptoms were primarily assessed using instruments and impairment thresholds that are not adapted for people with ALS. Future trials should include non-motor symptom assessments to evaluate the additional potential therapeutic benefit of candidate drugs.Propsero registrationCRD42020223648.