Dataset Information

Hypercalcemia following discontinuation of denosumab therapy: A systematic review

ABSTRACT: Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that has been approved to treat osteoporosis, skeletal metastasis, and giant cell tumor of bone in skeletally mature patients. Due to its potential adverse effects on normal bone growth, its use has not yet been approved in skeletally immature patients; however, the use of this agent in such patients with overt or dysregulated bone resorptive conditions has been explored in recent years. While most studies have proven the effectiveness of denosumab in controlling the progression of various disorders in skeletally immature patients, they have also revealed that refractory hypercalcemia often follows the discontinuation of denosumab treatment, raising a concern over the use of this agent in these patients. Thus, this study was designed to better understand the pathology of this condition through a systematic review of the published literature. Our analysis suggests that this condition has a potential male predisposition, that there is a correlation between the duration of denosumab treatment and patient age, and that this condition often occurs within 3 months after the last administration of denosumab in skeletally immature patients but is significantly less likely in adults. These results may further underscore that high bone formation and bone turnover rates are critically associated with hypercalcemia after the discontinuation of denosumab. In contrast, given that not all skeletally immature patients develop hypercalcemia, it is probable that other unidentified factors are involved in the pathology of this condition. Highlights • Rebound hypercalcemia often follows denosumab cessation in juveniles.• Although relatively rare, rebound hypercalcemia can occur in adults.• Rebound hypercalcemia may have a male predisposition in juveniles.• Treatment duration of denosumab required to trigger hypercalcemia correlates with age.• Onset of hypercalcemia is significantly earlier in juveniles than in adults.

SUBMITTER: Horiuchi K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8605220 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Stopping denosumab after 8 years of continued treatment was associated with bone loss during a 1-year observation study in patients who were not prescribed osteoporosis treatment. Bone loss was attenuated in patients who began another osteoporosis therapy. Treatment to prevent bone loss upon stopping denosumab should be considered.IntroductionThis study aimed to understand osteoporosis management strategies during a 1-year observational follow-up after up to 8 years of denosumab treatment in a phase 2 study.MethodsDuring the observational year, patients received osteoporosis management at the discretion of their physician and returned to the clinic for BMD assessment and completion of an osteoporosis management questionnaire. Incidence of serious adverse events and fractures was collected. Analyses were descriptive.ResultsOf 138 eligible patients, 82 enrolled in and completed the observation study. Most (65 [79%]) did not receive prescription osteoporosis medication, with "my doctor felt I no longer needed a medication" being the most common reason (23 [35%]). Of the 17 patients who took osteoporosis medications, 8 discontinued therapy during the observation study. In patients treated with denosumab for 8 years (N = 52), BMD decreased during the 1-year observation study (6.7% [lumbar spine], 6.6% [total hip]). Those who took osteoporosis medication during the observation study showed a smaller decline in BMD than those who did not. No new safety concerns were identified. Eight patients (9.8%), all of whom had at least one predisposing risk factor, experienced 17 fractures. This included seven patients who experienced one or more vertebral fractures.ConclusionsConsistent with denosumab's mechanism of action, treatment cessation led to reversal of the drug's effect on BMD and perhaps fracture risk. For patients who took osteoporosis therapy, bone loss was attenuated. For patients at high fracture risk, switching to another osteoporosis therapy if denosumab is discontinued seems appropriate.

Project description:Background: Though denosumab is an effective treatment for osteoporosis, the rebound effect after discontinuation has drawn investigators' attention. It includes a dramatic loss of gained bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased risk of vertebral fractures. This prospective multi-institutional randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether zoledronate prevents loss of BMD after discontinuation of denosumab. The trial was registered as Denosumab Sequential Therapy (DST) trial in March 2019 at clinicaltrials.gov, with the identifier NCT03868033. Methods: The study is conducted at National Taiwan University Hospital and its branches. Patients who have continuously received denosumab treatment for two or more years are surveyed for eligibility. Baseline characteristics and questionnaires of life quality are recorded after recruitment. BMD, circulating levels of bone turnover markers (BTMs), including serum N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen (P1NP) and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX), are checked before the stratified randomization to 4 groups. Biological sex and the T-scores are used to create 4 strata. The participants in group 1 adhere to regular denosumab therapy for another 2 years. All the other patients receive on-time zoledronate treatment in the first year. The participants in group 2, 3, and 4 have on-time denosumab, on-time zoledronate and drug holiday in the second year, respectively. BMDs are checked annually. Pre-scheduled checkpoints of BTMs are also arranged. For patient safety, rescue treatment with another injection of zoledronate will be applied to the patients on drug holiday if the CTX levels raise above the pre-specified threshold, 0.573 ng/mL for women and 0.584 ng/mL for men. The primary outcomes are the percentage changes of BMDs in lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck. The secondary outcomes include the changes of serum level of the BTMs, new osteoporotic fractures, extra zoledronate injections needed in group 4 and the differences of quality of life. Discussion: We aim to provide evidence whether zoledronate prevents bone loss after denosumab cessation. To our knowledge, the study has the largest sample size. No other randomized controlled study included all the three different treatment strategies and a positive control. It is also the first associated randomized controlled trial outside Europe.

Project description:Background: Denosumab is approved to prevent fragility fractures in patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture and to prevent bone loss in patients with breast and prostate cancer who receive endocrine therapy. The antiresorptive effect of denosumab rapidly dissipates when it is delayed or discontinued, but the risk for, and incidence of, multiple clinical vertebral fractures in patients with breast cancer after stopping denosumab is currently unclear. Question/Purposes: We sought to identify the incidence of clinical vertebral fractures in patients with breast cancer who received at least 2 doses of denosumab (60 mg) and then discontinued the medication. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients with a history of breast cancer who were treated with denosumab between June 1, 2010, and July 18, 2018, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We identified 335 postmenopausal women and 1 man with nonmetastatic breast cancer who received their final denosumab injection at least 6.5 months earlier. Data recorded included baseline bone density and the incidence of vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation. Results: The median age of patients was 62 years. Patients received between 2 and 13 denosumab doses before drug discontinuation. Most of the patients (310; 92.3%) were also treated with aromatase inhibitors. Of the 194 patients with baseline bone density data, 50 (25.8%) had normal bone density, 97 (50.0%) had osteopenia, and 47 (24.2%) had osteoporosis. The median follow-up duration from the last denosumab dose was 18.5 months. We identified 1 case of spontaneous vertebral fractures after denosumab stoppage. We found no cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw or atypical femur fracture. Most of the patients (88%) had a gap in denosumab dosing. Conclusions: Clinicians treating patients with breast cancer-especially those continuing to take aromatase inhibitors-should be aware of the possible risks of delaying doses of or discontinuing denosumab and should educate their patients accordingly. Prospective studies are needed to fully evaluate the risks of stopping or delaying denosumab.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:We aimed to synthesise the available data for the effect of stopping alpha-blocker therapy among men with lower urinary tract symptoms. The focus was on symptom, uroflowmetry and quality of life outcomes, but we also reviewed the adverse events (AEs) and the number of patients who restarted therapy. DATA SOURCES:We searched MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE/Ovid and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to May 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:We selected studies regardless of study design in which men were treated with an alpha-blocker for at least 3 months and in which the effects of alpha-blocker discontinuation were subsequently studied. Only controlled trials were used for the primary objective. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS:Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for the controlled studies only using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS:We identified 10 studies (1081 participants) assessing the primary objective. Six studies (733 participants) assessed differences in AEs between continuation and discontinuation, and six studies (501 participants) reported the numbers of subjects that restarted treatment after discontinuation. No studies in primary care were identified. After discontinuing monotherapy, symptom scores increased and peak flow rates decreased at 3 and 6 months, but not at 12 months; however, neither parameter changed when alpha-blockers were stopped during combination therapy. Small differences in post-void residual volumes and quality of life scores were considered clinically irrelevant. We also found that 0%-49% of patients restarted after stopping alpha-blocker therapy and that AEs did not increase with discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS:Discontinuing alpha-blocker monotherapy leads to a worsening compared with continuing therapy. Discontinuing the alpha-blocker after combination therapy had no significant effects on outcomes in either the short or long term. Discontinuation may be appropriate for the frail, elderly or those with concomitant illness or polypharmacy. However, studies in primary care are lacking. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER:CRD42016032648.

Dataset Information

Hypercalcemia following discontinuation of denosumab therapy: A systematic review

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets