Dataset Information

A safe, reliable, and efficient robot-assisted port site closure for robot-assisted gastrectomy.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

The overall incidence of port site hernias in laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgeries ranges from 0% to 5.2%. Sufficient port site closure is essential to reduce and prevent the occurrence of port site hernia. However, complete fascial closure of 8-mm robot-port site appears to be difficult. In this study, we propose a safe and reliable robot-assisted port-site closure for robot-assisted gastrectomy.

Materials and methods

The robotic arm was tilted 60-70° cranially or caudally to create a small gap between the port and the skin margin that was cut open for port insertion. While viewing through the robotic camera and grasping the polydioxanone (PDS) thread, the Lapa-Her-Closure was inserted into the peritoneal cavity through the gap. The Lapa-Her-Closure was removed after the PDS thread was grasped with robotic forceps. Subsequently, the Lapa-Her-Closure was inserted into the abdominal cavity by tilting the arm cranially or caudally, in contrast to the previous step. The PDS thread was inserted into the loop wire using robotic forceps. After tightening the loop wire and grasping the PDS thread, the Lapa-Her-Closure was removed, and the PDS thread was ligated to complete the abdominal wall closure, with total closure of the fascia and peritoneum.

Results and conclusions

We utilized this port site closure technique in 12 patients who underwent robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The procedure was accomplished safely and efficiently in all cases without any technical problems. In conclusion, our port site closure is safe, reliable, and efficient procedure that can be performed using basic surgical techniques.

SUBMITTER: Hirahara N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8606878 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Radical gastrectomy with an adequate lymphadenectomy is the main procedure which makes it possible to cure patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC). A number of randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis provide phase III evidence that laparoscopic gastrectomy is technically safe and that it yields better short-term outcomes than conventional open gastrectomy for early-stage GC. While laparoscopic gastrectomy has become standard therapy for early-stage GC, especially in Asian countries such as Japan and South Korea, the use of minimally invasive techniques is still controversial for the treatment of more advanced tumours, principally due to existing concerns about its oncological adequacy and capacity to carry out an adequately extended lymphadenectomy. Some intrinsic drawbacks of the conventional laparoscopic technique have prevented the worldwide spread of laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer and, despite technological advances in recent year, it remains a technically challenging procedure. The introduction of robotic surgery over the last ten years has implied a notable mutation of certain minimally invasive procedures, making it possible to overcome some limitations of the traditional laparoscopic technique. Robot-assisted gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection has been shown to be safe and feasible in prospective and retrospective studies. However, to date there are no high quality comparative studies investigating the advantages of a robotic approach to GC over traditional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. On the basis of the literature review here presented, robot-assisted surgery seems to fulfill oncologic criteria for D2 dissection and has a comparable oncologic outcome to traditional laparoscopic and open procedure. Robot-assisted gastrectomy was associated with the trend toward a shorter hospital stay with a comparable morbidity of conventional laparoscopic and open gastrectomy, but randomized clinical trials and longer follow-ups are needed to evaluate the possible influence of robot gastrectomy on GC patient survival.

Project description:BackgroundIn the last decade's robotic gastrectomy (RG) has increasingly widespread as a valid minimally invasive option for treatment of gastric cancer. In literature, evidence of its routine use is not yet well established. The aims of this study are to report our initial experience and to present possible advantages of our hybrid operative technique for subtotal gastrectomy.Materials and methodsRetrospectively, we analyzed data from 41 patients (22 male and 19 female) who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (RALG) with D2 lymphadenectomy using the da Vinci XI robotic system. Inclusion criteria were gastric cancer in the middle or lower portion of the stomach amenable of radical subtotal gastrectomy without preoperative suspicion of positive lymph-nodes or other organs involving and distant metastasis. All the procedures were performed by attending surgeons.ResultsThe mean operative time was 270 min with one case of conversion to open surgery. The mean age was 71.4 (IQR 68.2-76.8) with 43.9% of patients classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score ≥3. The median of lymph-nodes retrieved was 25 (IQR 19-35). No intra-operative complications occurred. Time to resume a soft diet was 5 days. Patients were hospitalized a median of 7 days. According to pathological AJCC-TNM, 21 patients were classified as advanced gastric cancer. Post-operative morbidity was recorded in 9 patients (21.9%) with major complications requiring surgical operation in 4 patients (9.8%). Elevated ASA score, fewer lymph-nodes retrieved and ICU recovery requirements were significant increased in patients with major complications.ConclusionThe preliminary results demonstrated that robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy is safe and feasible. In particular, we found that the da Vinci platform improves surgeon abilities to perform an adequate lymphadenectomy and digestive reconstruction. Further studies are necessary to better clarify the role of this high-cost technology in minimally invasive treatment of gastric cancer.