Dataset Information

Multicenter assessment of shotgun metagenomics for pathogen detection.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Shotgun metagenomics has been used clinically for diagnosing infectious diseases. However, most technical assessments have been limited to individual sets of reference standards, experimental workflows, and laboratories.

Methods

A reference panel and performance metrics were designed and used to examine the performance of shotgun metagenomics at 17 laboratories in a coordinated collaborative study. We comprehensively assessed the reliability, key performance determinants, reproducibility, and quantitative potential.

Findings

Assay performance varied significantly across sites and microbial classes, with a read depth of 20 millions as a generally cost-efficient assay setting. Results of mapped reads by shotgun metagenomics could indicate relative and intra-site (but not absolute or inter-site) microbial abundance.

Interpretation

Assay performance was significantly impacted by the microbial type, the host context, and read depth, which emphasizes the importance of these factors when designing reference reagents and benchmarking studies. Across sites, workflows and platforms, false positive reporting and considerable site/library effects were common challenges to the assay's accuracy and quantifiability. Our study also suggested that laboratory-developed shotgun metagenomics tests for pathogen detection should aim to detect microbes at 500 CFU/mL (or copies/mL) in a clinically relevant host context (10^5 human cells/mL) within a 24h turn-around time, and with an efficient read depth of 20M.

Funding

This work was supported by National Science and Technology Major Project of China (2018ZX10102001).

SUBMITTER: Liu D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8608867 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Although microbial communities are associated with human, environmental, plant, and animal health, there exists no cost-effective method for precisely characterizing species and genes in such communities. While deep whole-metagenome shotgun (WMS) sequencing provides high taxonomic and functional resolution, it is often prohibitively expensive for large-scale studies. The prevailing alternative, 16S rRNA gene amplicon (16S) sequencing, often does not resolve taxonomy past the genus level and provides only moderately accurate predictions of the functional profile; thus, there is currently no widely accepted approach to affordable, high-resolution, taxonomic, and functional microbiome analysis. To address this technology gap, we evaluated the information content of shallow shotgun sequencing with as low as 0.5 million sequences per sample as an alternative to 16S sequencing for large human microbiome studies. We describe a library preparation protocol enabling shallow shotgun sequencing at approximately the same per-sample cost as 16S sequencing. We analyzed multiple real and simulated biological data sets, including two novel human stool samples with ultradeep sequencing of 2.5 billion sequences per sample, and found that shallow shotgun sequencing recovers more-accurate species-level taxonomic and functional profiles of the human microbiome than 16S sequencing. We discuss the inherent limitations of shallow shotgun sequencing and note that 16S sequencing remains a valuable and important method for taxonomic profiling of novel environments. Although deep WMS sequencing remains the gold standard for high-resolution microbiome analysis, we recommend that researchers consider shallow shotgun sequencing as a useful alternative to 16S sequencing for large-scale human microbiome research studies where WMS sequencing may be cost-prohibitive. IMPORTANCE A common refrain in recent microbiome-related academic meetings is that the field needs to move away from broad taxonomic surveys using 16S sequencing and toward more powerful longitudinal studies using shotgun sequencing. However, performing deep shotgun sequencing in large longitudinal studies remains prohibitively expensive for all but the most well-funded research labs and consortia, which leads many researchers to choose 16S sequencing for large studies, followed by deep shotgun sequencing on a subset of targeted samples. Here, we show that shallow- or moderate-depth shotgun sequencing may be used by researchers to obtain species-level taxonomic and functional data at approximately the same cost as amplicon sequencing. While shallow shotgun sequencing is not intended to replace deep shotgun sequencing for strain-level characterization, we recommend that microbiome scientists consider using shallow shotgun sequencing instead of 16S sequencing for large-scale human microbiome studies.

Project description:Introduction:Microbiome research based on high-throughput sequencing has grown exponentially in recent years, but methodological variations can easily undermine the reproducibility across studies. Objectives:To systematically evaluate the comparability of sequencing results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16Ss)- and shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMs)-based microbial community profiling in laboratories under routine conditions. Methods:We designed a multicenter study across 35 participating laboratories in China using designed mock communities and homogenized fecal samples. Results:A wide range of practices and approaches was reported by the participating laboratories. The observed microbial compositions of the mock communities in 46.2% (12/26) of the 16Ss and 82.6% (19/23) of the SMs laboratories had significant correlations with the expected result (Spearman r>0.59, P <0.05). The results from laboratories with near-identical protocols showed slight interlaboratory deviations. However, a high degree of interlaboratory deviation was found in the observed abundances of specific taxa, such as Bacteroides spp. (range: 0.3%-53.5%), Enterococci spp. (range: 0.8%-43.9%) and Fusobacterium spp. (range: 0.1%-39.8%). SMs performed better than 16Ss in detecting low-abundance bacteria (B. bifidum). The differences in DNA extraction methods, amplified regions and bioinformatics analysis tools (taxonomic classifiers and database) were important factors causing interlaboratory deviations. Addressing laboratory contamination is an urgent task because various sources of unexpected microbes were found in negative control samples. Conclusions:Well-defined control samples, such as the mock communities in this study, should be routinely used in microbiome research for monitoring potential biases. The findings in this study will provide guidance in the choice of more reasonable operating procedures to minimize potential methodological biases in revealing human microbiota composition.