Dataset Information

Identification of Mutator-Derived lncRNA Signatures of Genomic Instability for Promoting the Clinical Outcome in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Accumulating evidence proves that long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) plays a crucial role in maintaining genomic instability. However, it is significantly absent from exploring genomic instability-associated lncRNAs and discovering their clinical significance.

Objective

To identify crucial mutator-derived lncRNAs and construct a predictive model for prognosis and genomic instability in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods

First, we constructed a mutator hypothesis-derived calculative framework through uniting the lncRNA expression level and somatic mutation number to screen for genomic instability-associated lncRNA in hepatocellular carcinoma. We then selected mutator-derived lncRNA from the genome instability-associated lncRNA by univariate Cox analysis and Lasso regression analysis. Next, we created a prognosis model with the mutator-derived lncRNA signature. Furthermore, we verified the vital role of the model in the prognosis and genomic instability of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Finally, we examined the potential relationship between the model and the mutation status of TP53.

Results

In this study, we screened 88 genome instability-associated lncRNAs and built a prognosis model with four mutator-derived lncRNAs. Moreover, the model was an independent predictor of prognosis and an accurate indicator of genomic instability in hepatocellular carcinoma. Finally, the model could catch the TP53 mutation status, and the model was a more effective indicator than the mutation status of TP53 for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Conclusion

This research adopted a reliable method to analyze the role of lncRNA in genomic instability. Besides, the prognostic model with four mutator-derived lncRNAs is an excellent new indicator of prognosis and genomic instability in hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, this finding may help clinicians develop therapeutic systems.

SUBMITTER: Tang X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8613502 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIncreasing evidence has emerged to reveal the correlation between genomic instability and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). The genomic instability-derived lncRNA landscape of prostate cancer (PCa) and its critical clinical implications remain to be understood.MethodsPatients diagnosed with PCa were recruited from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program. Genomic instability-associated lncRNAs were identified by a mutator hypothesis-originated calculative approach. A signature (GILncSig) was derived from genomic instability-associated lncRNAs to classify PCa patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. The biochemical recurrence (BCR) model of a genomic instability-derived lncRNA signature (GILncSig) was established by Cox regression and stratified analysis in the train set. Then its prognostic value and association with clinical features were verified by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the test set and the total patient set. The regulatory network of transcription factors (TFs) and lncRNAs was established to evaluate TF-lncRNA interactions.ResultsA total of 95 genomic instability-associated lncRNAs of PCa were identified. We constructed the GILncSig based on 10 lncRNAs with independent prognostic value. GILncSig separated patients into the high-risk (n = 121) group and the low-risk (n = 121) group in the train set. Patients with high GILncSig score suffered from more frequent BCR than those with low GILncSig score. The results were further validated in the test set, the whole TCGA cohort, and different subgroups stratified by age and Gleason score (GS). A high GILncSig risk score was significantly associated with a high mutation burden and a low critical gene expression (PTEN and CDK12) in PCa. The predictive performance of our BCR model based on GILncSig outperformed other existing BCR models of PCa based on lncRNAs. The GILncSig also showed a remarkable ability to predict BCR in the subgroup of patients with TP53 mutation or wild type. Transcription factors, such as FOXA1, JUND, and SRF, were found to participate in the regulation of lncRNAs with prognostic value.ConclusionIn summary, we developed a prognostic signature of BCR based on genomic instability-associated lncRNAs for PCa, which may provide new insights into the epigenetic mechanism of BCR.

Project description:Background: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is a highly heterogeneous tumor with substantial somatic mutations and genome instability, which are emerging hallmarks of cancer. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are promising cancer biomarkers that are reportedly involved in genomic instability. However, the identification of genome instability-related lncRNAs (GInLncRNAs) and their clinical significance has not been investigated in LUAD. Methods: We determined GInLncRNAs by combining somatic mutation and transcriptome data of 457 patients with LUAD and probed their potential function using co-expression network and Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses. We then filtered GInLncRNAs by Cox regression and LASSO regression to construct a genome instability-related lncRNA signature (GInLncSig). We subsequently evaluated GInLncSig using correlation analyses with mutations, external validation, model comparisons, independent prognostic significance analyses, and clinical stratification analyses. Finally, we established a nomogram for prognosis prediction in patients with LUAD and validated it in the testing set and the entire TCGA dataset. Results: We identified 161 GInLncRNAs, of which seven were screened to develop a prognostic GInLncSig model (LINC01133, LINC01116, LINC01671, FAM83A-AS1, PLAC4, MIR223HG, and AL590226.1). GInLncSig independently predicted the overall survival of patients with LUAD and displayed an improved performance compared to other similar signatures. Furthermore, GInLncSig was related to somatic mutation patterns, suggesting its ability to reflect genome instability in LUAD. Finally, a nomogram comprising the GInLncSig and tumor stage exhibited improved robustness and clinical practicability for predicting patient prognosis. Conclusion: Our study identified a signature for prognostic prediction in LUAD comprising seven lncRNAs associated with genome instability, which may provide a useful indicator for clinical stratification management and treatment decisions for patients with LUAD.