Preservation of neurocognitive function in the treatment of brain metastases.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Parsons MW
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8633744 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Neurosurgical resection and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) are accepted treatments for single and oligometastatic cancer to the brain. To avoid the decline in neurocognitive function (NCF) linked to WBRT, the authors conducted a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 study to determine whether surgery and carmustine wafers (CW), while deferring WBRT, could preserve NCF and achieve local control (LC).NCF and LC were measured in 59 patients who underwent resection and received CW for a single (83%) or dominant (oligometastatic, 2 to 3 lesions) metastasis and received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for tiny nodules not treated with resection plus CW. Preservation of NCF was defined as an improvement or a decline ? 1 standard deviation from baseline in 3 domains: memory, executive function, and fine motor skills, evaluated at 2-month intervals.Significant improvements in executive function and memory occurred throughout the 1-year follow-up. Preservation or improvement of NCF occurred in all 3 domains for the majority of patients at each of the 2-month intervals. NCF declined in only 1 patient. The chemowafers were well tolerated, and serious adverse events were reversible. There was local recurrence in 28% of the patients at 1-year follow-up.Patients with brain metastases had improvements in their cognitive trajectory, especially memory and executive function, after treatment with resection plus CW. The rate of LC (78%) was comparable to historic rates of surgery with WBRT and superior to reports of WBRT alone. For patients who undergo resection for symptomatic or large-volume metastasis or for tissue diagnosis, the addition of CW can be considered as an option.
| S-EPMC4209121 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is an effective treatment in brain metastases and, when combined with local treatments such as surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery, gives the best brain control. Nonetheless, WBRT is often omitted after local treatment due to its potential late neurocognitive effects. Publications on radiation-induced neurotoxicity have used different assessment methods, time to assessment, and definition of impairment, thus making it difficult to accurately assess the rate and magnitude of the neurocognitive decline that can be expected. In this context, and to help therapeutic decision making, we have conducted this literature review, with the aim of providing an average incidence, magnitude and time to occurrence of radio-induced neurocognitive decline. We reviewed all English language published articles on neurocognitive effects of WBRT for newly diagnosed brain metastases or with a preventive goal in adult patients, with any methodology (MMSE, battery of neurcognitive tests) with which baseline status was provided. We concluded that neurocognitive decline is predominant at 4 months, strongly dependant on brain metastases control, partially solved at later time, graded 1 on a SOMA-LENT scale (only 8% of grade 2 and more), insufficiently assessed in long-term survivors, thus justifying all efforts to reduce it through irradiation modulation.
| S-EPMC3403847 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWhole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) used to be standard of care for patients suffering from melanoma brain metastases (MBM) and may still be applicable in selected cases. Deterioration of neurocognitive function (NCF) is commonly seen during and after WBRT. Knowledge on long-term effects in melanoma patients is limited due to short survival rates. With the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, patients may experience ongoing disease control, emphasizing the need for paying more attention to potential long-term adverse effects.MethodsIn this single-center study, we identified in a period of 11 years all long-term survivors of MBM who received WBRT at least 1 year prior to inclusion. NCF was assessed by Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB) screening and detailed neurological exam; confounders were documented.ResultsEight patients (median age 55 years) could be identified with a median follow-up of 5.4 years after WBRT. Six patients reported no subjective neurological impairment. NAB screening revealed an average-range score in 5/8 patients. In 3/8 patients a NAB score below average was obtained, correlating with subjective memory deficits in 2 patients. In these patients, limited performance shown in modalities like memory function, attention, and spatial abilities may be considerably attributed to metastasis localization itself. Six out of 8 patients were able to return to their previous work.ConclusionFive of 8 long-term survivors with MBM after WBRT experienced little to no restriction in everyday activities. In 3 out of 8 patients, cognitive decline was primarily explained by localization of the metastases in functionally relevant areas of the brain. The results of our small patient cohort do not support general avoidance of WBRT for treatment of brain metastases. However, long-term studies including pretreatment NCF tests are needed to fully analyze the long-term neurocognitive effects of WBRT.
| S-EPMC9515012 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHippocampal avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) shows potential for neurocognitive preservation. This study aimed to evaluate whether HA-WBRT or conformal WBRT (C-WBRT) is better for preserving neurocognitive function.MethodsThis single-blinded randomized phase II trial enrolled patients with brain metastases and randomly assigned them to receive HA-WBRT or C-WBRT. Primary endpoint is decline of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) delayed recall at 4 months after treatment. Neurocognitive function tests were analyzed with a mixed effect model. Brain progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsFrom March 2015 to December 2018, seventy patients were randomized to yield a total cohort of 65 evaluable patients (33 in the HA-WBRT arm and 32 in the C-WBRT arm) with a median follow-up of 12.4 months. No differences in baseline neurocognitive function existed between the 2 arms. The mean change of HVLT-R delayed recall at 4 months was -8.8% in the HA-WBRT arm and +3.8% in the C-WBRT arm (P = 0.31). At 6 months, patients receiving HA-WBRT showed favorable perpetuation of HVLT-R total recall (mean difference = 2.60, P = 0.079) and significantly better preservation of the HVLT-R recognition-discrimination index (mean difference = 1.78, P = 0.019) and memory score (mean difference = 4.38, P = 0.020) compared with patients undergoing C-WBRT. There were no differences in Trail Making Test Part A or Part B or the Controlled Oral Word Association test between the 2 arms at any time point. There were no differences in brain PFS or OS between arms as well.ConclusionPatients receiving HA-WBRT without memantine showed better preservation in memory at 6-month follow-up, but not in verbal fluency or executive function.
| S-EPMC7992885 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract In our ongoing phase III randomized trial (NCT03741673) evaluating risk of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) in patients with brain metastasis, patients are stratified by tumor size, location, and histology, and randomized to pre-operative SRS versus post-operative SRS. The primary endpoint is 1-year LMD-free rate, and exploratory endpoints include neurocognitive function (NCF). NCF is assessed prior to treatment and longitudinally (1.5, 6, and 12 months from the start of treatment) with the HVLT-R, TMT, and COWA yielding the Clinical Trial Battery Composite score (CTB COMP). Patients also complete the MDASI-BT, which includes a Cognitive Factor measuring patient reported cognitive concerns. Currently, 41 patients completed pre-treatment NCF baseline. Characteristics of patients with pre-treatment NCF baseline include mean (SD): age 60.0+/-11.7 years, 2.6+/-2.2 metastases, 15.2+/-10.1 cc brain metastases volume, median KPS 90 (range: 70-100), 83% white, 52% male, and 50% received AEDs at time of surgery. The most common primary cancers among this cohort were: 31% NSCLC, 19% RCC, 14% melanoma, 7% breast, 2% thyroid, and 26% other. Mean (SD) NCF z-scores ranged from z= -0.09 (1.08) to -3.09 (6.13), CTB COMP z=-1.13 (1.65), and the mean (SD) MDASI-BT Cognitive Factor score was 1.1 (1.3). Using multivariable linear regression including CTB COMP, MDASI-BT Cognitive and Affective Factor, KPS, number of and intracranial volume of metastases, only intracranial volume of metastases was statistically significantly associated with CTB COMP (B=-.058, p=.034) and only the MDASI-BT Affective Factor was statistically significantly associated with the MDASI-BT Cognitive Factor (B=.305, p=<.001). At baseline, disease factors such as tumor burden appear to be the primary driver of objectively measured neurocognitive dysfunction and mood factors appear to be the primary driver of subjective patient reported neurocognitive concerns. This has important implications for interpretation of these different clinical outcome assessments in clinical trials measuring objective neurocognitive function and subjective neurocognitive concerns.
| S-EPMC10402347 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Brain metastases (BMs) occur in 10% to 20% of adult patients with cancer, and with increased surveillance and improved systemic control, the incidence is likely to grow. Despite multimodal treatment, prognosis remains poor. Current evidence supports use of whole-brain radiation therapy when patients present with multiple BMs. However, its associated cognitive impairment is a major deterrent in patients likely to live longer than 6 months. In patients with oligometastases (one to three metastases) and even some with multiple lesions less than 3 to 4 cm, especially if the primary tumor is considered radiotherapy resistant, stereotactic radiosurgery is recommended; if the BMs are greater than 4 cm, surgical resection with or without postoperative whole-brain radiation therapy should be considered. There is increasing evidence that systemic therapy, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, is effective against BM and may be an early choice, especially in patients with sensitive primary tumors. In patients with progressive systemic disease, limited treatment options, and poor performance status, best supportive care may be appropriate. Regardless of treatment goals, use of corticosteroids or antiepileptic medications is helpful in symptomatic patients. In this review, we provide a summary of current therapy, as well as developments in the treatment of BM from solid tumors.
| S-EPMC5087313 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Melanoma is a type of skin cancer in which there is a strong correlation between its occurrence and exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Although it is not the most common skin cancer, it has the highest mortality rate of all skin cancers. The prognosis of patients is significantly worsened by melanoma metastasis to the brain, which often occurs in patients with advanced disease. The formation and development of melanoma metastases to the brain involve a very complex process, and their mechanisms are not fully understood. One of the ways for metastatic melanoma cells to survive and develop cancer in the brain environment is the presence of oncogenic BRAF mutation, which occurs in up to 50% of metastatic melanoma cases. Before discovering new methods of treating metastases, the overall survival of patients with this disease was 6 months. Currently, research is being conducted on new drugs using immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors: anti-PD-1, anti-CTLA-4) and targeted therapy (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) to improve the prognosis of patients. In this article, we summarize the current state of knowledge about the results of treating brain metastases with new systemic therapies.
| S-EPMC10452790 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Approximately 10% to 15% of women with metastatic breast cancer will develop brain metastases. Treatment options for these women remain limited, particularly at the time of central nervous system (CNS) relapse following completion of initial CNS-directed therapy. Historically, prior studies have broadly examined systemic treatments for breast cancer brain metastases with mixed, but overall disappointing, results. More recently, studies have increasingly selected patients based on breast cancer subtype and have examined novel, targeted agents that have preclinical suggestion of blood-brain barrier penetration. Correlative science objectives, with both tissue-based and novel imaging endpoints, are more frequently incorporated into trials of this nature, with the goal of enhancing our understanding of possible predictors of response. This review summarizes the current and emerging data on systemic therapy for breast cancer brain metastases and provides a framework for future directions in treating this clinically-challenging entity.
| S-EPMC3383009 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeBrain metastases (BM) themselves and treatment with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can influence neurocognitive functioning. This prospective study aimed to assess neurocognitive decline in patients with BM after SRS.MethodsA neuropsychological test battery was assessed yielding ten test outcomes. Neurocognitive decline at 3 and 6 months post SRS was compared to measurement prior to Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator (LINAC) SRS. Reliable change indices with correction for practice effects were calculated to determine the percentage of neurocognitive decline (defined as decline on ≥ 2 test outcomes). Risk factors of neurocognitive decline were analyzed with binary logistic regression.ResultsOf 194 patients pre-SRS, 40 GK and 29 LINAC patients had data accessible at 6 months. Compared to baseline, 38% of GK patients declined at 3 months, and 23% declined at 6 months. GK patients declined on attention, executive functioning, verbal memory, and fine motor skill. Of LINAC patients, 10% declined at 3 months, and 24% at 6 months. LINAC patients declined on executive functioning, verbal memory, and fine motor skills. Risk factors of neurocognitive decline at 3 months were high age, low education level and type of SRS (GK or LINAC). At 6 months, high age was a risk factor. Karnofsky Performance Scale, BM volume, number of BM, tumor progression and neurocognitive impairment pre-SRS were no risk factors.ConclusionNeurocognitive decline occurs in a considerable proportion of patients with BM treated with GK or LINAC SRS. Overall, high age appears to be a risk factor for neurocognitive decline after SRS.
| S-EPMC9713121 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Brain metastases from breast cancer (BCBM) constitute the second most common cause of brain metastasis (BM), and the incidence of these frequently lethal lesions is currently increasing, following better systemic treatment. Patients with ER-negative and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) are the most likely to develop BM, but if this diagnosis remains associated with a worse prognosis, long survival is now common for patients with HER2-positive BC. BCBM represents a therapeutic challenge that needs a coordinated treatment strategy along international guidelines. Surgery has always to be considered when feasible. It is now well established that stereotaxic radiosurgery allows for equivalent control and less-cognitive toxicities than whole-brain radiation therapy, which should be delayed as much as possible. Medical treatment for BCBM is currently a rapidly evolving field. It has been shown that the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is often impaired in macroscopic BM, and several chemotherapy regimens, antibody-drug conjugates and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors have been shown to be active on BCBM and can be part of the global treatment strategy. This paper provides an overview of the therapeutic option for BCBM that is currently available and outlines potential new approaches for tackling these deadly secondary tumours.
| S-EPMC7782834 | biostudies-literature