Dataset Information

"Get with the Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score" for mortality prediction in patients undergoing MitraClip.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Reliable risk scores in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) are lacking. Heart failure is common in these patients, and risk scores derived from heart failure populations might help stratify TMVR patients.

Methods

Consecutive patients from three Heart Centers undergoing TMVR were enrolled to investigate the association of the "Get with the Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score" (comprising the variables systolic blood pressure, urea nitrogen, blood sodium, age, heart rate, race, history of chronic obstructive lung disease) with all-cause mortality.

Results

Among 815 patients with available data 177 patients died during a median follow-up time of 365 days. Estimated 1-year mortality by quartiles of the score (0-37; 38-42, 43-46 and more than 46 points) was 6%, 10%, 23% and 30%, respectively (p < 0.001), with good concordance between observed and predicted mortality rates (goodness of fit test p = 0.46). Every increase of one score point was associated with a 9% increase in the hazard of mortality (95% CI 1.06-1.11%, p < 0.001). The score was associated with long-term mortality independently of left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class and NTproBNP, and was equally predictive in primary and secondary mitral regurgitation.

Conclusion

The "Get with the Guidelines Heart Failure Risk Score" showed a strong association with mortality in patients undergoing TMVR with additive information beyond traditional risk factors. Given the routinely available variables included in this score, application is easy and broadly possible.

SUBMITTER: Iliadis C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8639563 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsThis study aimed to develop and validate a simple method for predicting long-term all-cause mortality in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) residing in an area where Chagas disease is endemic, which will be important not only for patients living in Latin America but also to those living in developed non-endemic countries.Methods and resultsA total of 677 patients with a wide spectrum of aetiologies for left ventricular systolic dysfunction and receiving optimized evidence-based treatment for CHF were prospectively followed for approximately 11 years. We established a risk score using Cox proportional hazard regression models. After multivariable analysis, four variables were independently associated with mortality and included in the CALL Risk Score: Chagas cardiomyopathy aetiology alone [hazard ratio, 3.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.61-4.33; P < 0.001], age ≥60 years (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.74; P = 0.016), left anterior fascicular block (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.27-2.11; P < 0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.30-2.28; P < 0.001). The internal validation considered the bootstrapping, a resampling technique recommended for prediction model development. Hence, we established a scoring system attributing weights according to each risk factor: 3 points for Chagas cardiomyopathy alone, 1 point for age ≥60 years, and 2 points each for left anterior fascicular block and left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. Three risk groups were identified: low risk (score ≤2 points), intermediate risk (score of 3 to 5 points), and high risk (score ≥6 points). High-risk patients had more than two-fold increase in mortality (26.9 events/100 patient-years) compared with intermediate-risk patients (10.1 events/100 patient-years) and almost seven-fold increase compared with low-risk patients (4.3 events/100 patient-years). The CALL Risk Score data sets from the development and internal validation cohorts both displayed suitable discrimination c-index of 0.689 (95% CI, 0.688-0.690; P < 0.001) and 0.687 (95% CI, 0.686-0.688; P < 0.001), respectively, and satisfactory calibration [Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino test (8) = 7.867; P = 0.447] and [Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino test (8) = 10.08; P = 0.273], respectively.ConclusionsThe CALL Risk Score represents a simple and validated method with a limited number of non-invasive variables that successfully predicts long-term all-cause mortality in a real-world cohort of patients with CHF. Patients with CHF stratified as high risk according to the CALL Risk Score should be monitored and aggressively managed, including those with CHF secondary to Chagas disease.

Project description:Background The cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) population is no longer composed of only patients with acute coronary syndromes, and includes those with acute heart failure and multiple comorbidities. We hypothesized that the GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure) risk score that predicts inpatient mortality in hospitalized patients with heart failure would predict mortality in CICU patients. Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed CICU patients at a tertiary care hospital from 2007 to 2015. The GWTG-HF risk score was calculated at CICU admission. As a secondary analysis, the EFFECT (Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment), OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure), and ADHERE (Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry) risk scores were calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value were determined for inpatient and 1-year mortality. The GWTG-HF risk score was calculated in 9532 (95%) patients, with a median value of 40 (interquartile range, 35-47). Inpatient mortality occurred in 824 (8.6%) patients, and 2075 (21.8%) patients died by 1 year. Patients who died in hospital had a significantly higher mean GWTG-HF score (47.7 versus 40.2; P<0.001). Inpatient and 1-year mortality increased in each GWTG-HF risk score quartile (P<0.0001). Discrimination of the GWTG-HF, EFFECT, OPTIMIZE-HF, and ADHERE risk scores was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for hospital mortality, and were similar for all risk scores (0.72-0.74; P>0.05). The Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic suggested poor calibration for hospital mortality by the GWTG-HF risk score (P<0.001). Conclusions The GWTG-HF risk score and other heart failure prediction tools demonstrate good discrimination for inpatient and 1-year mortality in a heterogeneous cohort of CICU patients. Our study emphasizes that prognostic variables overlap in cardiac patients, regardless of the admission diagnosis.

Project description:BackgroundMitral valve surgery (MVS) is an effective treatment for mitral valve diseases. There is a lack of reliable personalized risk prediction models for mortality in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. Our aim was to develop a risk stratification system to predict all-cause mortality in patients after mitral valve surgery.MethodsDifferent machine learning models for the prediction of all-cause mortality were trained on a derivation cohort of 1,883 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery [split into a training cohort (70%) and internal validation cohort (30%)] to predict all-cause mortality. Forty-five clinical variables routinely evaluated at discharge were used to train the models. The best performance model (PRIME score) was tested in an externally validated cohort of 220 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery. The model performance was evaluated according to the area under the curve (AUC). Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were compared with existing risk strategies.ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 2 years, there were 133 (7.063%) deaths in the derivation cohort and 17 (7.727%) deaths in the validation cohort. The PRIME score showed an AUC of 0.902 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.849-0.956) in the internal validation cohort and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.769-0.977) in the external validation cohort. In the external validation cohort, the performance of the PRIME score was significantly improved compared with that of the existing EuroSCORE II (NRI = 0.550, [95% CI 0.001-1.099], P = 0.049, IDI = 0.485, [95% CI 0.230-0.741], P < 0.001).ConclusionMachine learning-based model (the PRIME score) that integrate clinical, demographic, imaging, and laboratory features demonstrated superior performance for the prediction of mortality patients after mitral valve surgery compared with the traditional risk model EuroSCORE II.Clinical trial registration[http://www.clinicaltrials.gov], identifier [NCT05141292].

Project description:BACKGROUND:Most heart failure (HF) risk scores have been derived from cohorts of stable HF patients and may not incorporate up to date treatment regimens or deep phenotype characterization that change baseline risk over the short- and long-term follow-up period. We undertook the current analysis of participants in the GUIDE-IT (Guiding Evidence-Based Therapy Using Biomarker Intensified Treatment) trial to address these limitations. METHODS AND RESULTS:The GUIDE-IT study randomized 894 high-risk patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (? 40%) to biomarker-guided treatment strategy vs. usual care. We performed risk modelling using Cox proportional hazards models and analysed the relationship between 35 baseline clinical factors and the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospitalization, the secondary endpoint of all-cause mortality, and the exploratory endpoint of 90-day HF hospitalization or death. Prognostic relationships for continuous variables were examined and key predictors were identified using a backward variable selection process. Predictive models and risk scores were developed. Over a median follow-up of 15 months, the cumulative number of HF hospitalizations and CV deaths was 328 out of 894 patients (Kaplan-Meier event rate 34.5% at 12 months). Frequency of all-cause deaths was 143 out of 894 patients (Kaplan-Meier event rate 12.2% at 12 months). Outcomes for the primary and secondary endpoints between strategy arms of the study were similar. The most important predictor that was present in all three models was the baseline natriuretic peptide level. Hispanic ethnicity, low sodium and high heart rate were present in two of the three models. Other important predictors included the presence or absence of a device, New York Heart Association class, HF duration, black race, co-morbidities (sleep apnoea, elevated creatinine, ischaemic heart disease), low blood pressure, and a high congestion score. CONCLUSION:Risk models using readily available clinical information are able to accurately predict short- and long-term CV events and may be useful in optimizing care and enriching patients for clinical trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov ID number NCT01685840.