Dataset Information

Treatment Satisfaction With Current Medications for Chronic Constipation: An Internet Survey of Japanese Patients.

ABSTRACT:

Goals

This survey aims to determine relevant patient characteristics, treatment satisfaction, and bothersome symptoms in Japanese patients with chronic constipation (CC) treated at medical institutions.

Background

Epidemiological surveys of Japanese patients with CC are limited.

Study

This internet survey, conducted in 2017, included 500 adults (selected from 589 respondents to match age composition ratio in Japan) who experienced constipation-like symptoms for ≥6 months, were treated at medical institutions for symptoms, and were taking any prescribed medication.

Results

Of 500 patients, 65.6% were female and 62.6% had experienced constipation for >10 years. Abdominal bloating, infrequent bowel movement, hard consistency of stool, and difficulty of defecation were the most frequently reported and most bothersome symptoms in males and females. Overall, 29% of patients were satisfied with treatment (36% of males, 26% of females); the individual major CC symptom with the highest level of treatment satisfaction was infrequent bowel movement (31% of total, 45% of males, 26% of females). The level of treatment satisfaction for most individual major CC symptoms was lower in females than in males, and overall treatment satisfaction by therapeutic categories ranged from 16% to 46%. Mean overall treatment satisfaction, as well as mean treatment satisfaction for each major symptom, decreased with increasing number of treatments.

Conclusions

The survey results suggest that conventional treatment options were not effective enough to improve bothersome symptoms or treatment satisfaction. Treatment selection that is tailored to individual symptoms and takes patient characteristics into consideration may be key to improving patients' treatment satisfaction.

SUBMITTER: Hayashi T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8647691 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChronic constipation (CC) is one of the most frequently reported gastrointestinal disorders in the general population and a prominent problem among university students. The study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the associated factors of CC among Japanese university students.MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted among university students at Hiroshima University, Japan. Students answered the web questionnaire when making a web reservation for the health checkup (April 1 to May 31, 2023). The web questionnaire consisted of four sections, including baseline characteristics, lifestyle factors, family history of CC, and three scales to assess depression and eating disorders: the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Eating Attitudes Test (EAT)-26 and Bulimic Investigatory Test (BITE). CC was diagnosed using Rome IV criteria. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine CC-related factors.ResultsOut of 10,500 individuals who participated in the annual health checkup, 7,496 participants answered the web questionnaire, of whom 5,386 answered all the survey questions. The mean age of the students was 21.1 ± 4.1 years. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.17. The prevalence of CC was 13.7%. Factors significantly associated with CC in the multivariate model were first-degree family members with CC [Odd ratio (OR): 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.31-3.31], severe depression according to BDI scale (OR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.96-3.43), female sex (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.69-2.36), and short sleep duration of 6 hours or less per day (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.09-1.50). Lack of physical exercise tended to be associated with CC (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.00-1.40).ConclusionsCC is prevalent among Japanese university students. Significant risk factors for CC included the first-degree family history of CC, severe depression, female sex, and short sleep duration. Lack of physical exercise tended to be associated with CC. This may contribute to implementing suitable education health programs, health care professionals, and public health policies to identify individuals at risk for CC to prevent and treat CC effectively.

Project description:ObjectiveThe number of patients with chronic diseases and subsequent visits to various healthcare professionals has been rising over the past decades, exposing patients to potential risks of receiving conflicting medication information. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of conflicting information on medications perceived by chronic patients in Switzerland and to understand its impact on patients' medication self-management and navigation in the healthcare system.ParticipantsThis cross-sectional study included adult patients taking at least one prescribed medication for at least 6 months, who had visited at least two physicians in the past 3 months.Main outcome measuresData on patients' perceptions of conflicting information were collected in person through a 17-item questionnaire available on paper and electronically with four domains: (1) whether the patient had perceived any conflicting information, (2) categories of conflicting information, (3) impact and (4) sources involved in the conflicting information.ResultsOf the 405 included patients, 47% perceived conflicting information related to one or more medication topics including indication, schedule, dosage, risk, severity or duration of side effects. Patients who perceived conflicting information were prescribed more drugs than those perceiving no conflicting information (p<0.01). Consequently, 65% of the participants modified their navigation of the healthcare system and 34% reported medication non-adherence. General practitioners (82%), specialist physicians (74%) and pharmacists (49%) were the healthcare professionals most often involved in conflicting information. Experience with the medication, its package insert and significant others were more frequently involved in conflicting information than internet or social media.ConclusionNearly half the patients in our study perceived conflicting information in the outpatient healthcare system, which can decrease medication effectiveness and pose safety issues. This issue is widely overlooked and unaddressed. Consistency of information among healthcare providers in partnership with patients should be reinforced through guidelines and new models of interprofessional care.