Immune-Mediated Renal Diseases: A Team-Based Learning Module for Preclinical Medical Students.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
The underlying immune mechanisms of renal diseases are complex, and medical students benefit from learning these complexities in the setting of team-based learning (TBL), where they can apply foundational immunologic concepts to clinical problems.Methods
This immune-mediated renal disease TBL module focusing on glomerular disease was delivered over a period of 2 consecutive years in an integrated cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal block within the second semester of the first year of medical school. Each class consisted of 53 students, for a total of 106 students. The TBL module consisted of a seven-question individual and team readiness assurance test (iRAT and tRAT) and two clinically relevant team application activities. Following the TBL module, students completed an 18-item survey that collected information on student perspectives of engagement.Results
For the 2-year period, the iRAT average scores were 73% and 74%, and the tRAT average scores were 100% and 99%, respectively. The survey assessing student perceptions of engagement yielded positive feedback.Discussion
In summary, this TBL module effectively integrates the foundational and clinical sciences to teach higher-order concepts in immunology and renal disease pathogenesis to medical students.
SUBMITTER: Beckler MD
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8674152 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:IntroductionThrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) syndromes are a diverse group of disorders characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (intravascular hemolysis and presence of peripheral blood schistocytes) and thrombocytopenia. Prompt diagnosis is crucial to inform management and improve patient outcome. Clinical and laboratory manifestations of these various disorders overlap, making diagnosis difficult. My colleagues and I developed a team-based learning (TBL) module for second-year medical students in their hematology course block.MethodsStudents attend a 1-hour lecture on hemolytic anemia in their standard course curriculum and are given two articles to read outside of class in preparation for the TBL. Total out-of-class preparatory time is 30 minutes. The TBL runs for 1 hour, and students participate in groups of eight. Materials associated with this TBL include the lecture on hemolytic anemia, individual and group readiness assurance test questions, and application exercises. Explanations for all answers are provided for instructors.ResultsSurveys indicated students enjoyed the TBL and felt that after participation, their ability to diagnose a TMA was improved. They felt that the number of questions in the session was appropriate to time allowed and that the preparatory articles provided a sufficient level of understanding to participate in the TBL. Some commented they would have liked more time to complete the application exercises, so instructors could consider increasing the allotted time to 1.5 hours.DiscussionBased on the success of this TBL, we plan to develop additional modules for the course and investigate other measures of academic success after implementation.
| S-EPMC6342151 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionA frequently encountered complaint in primary care, pain has a variety of causes and treatments. To reduce mortality, the Centers for Disease Control released guidelines on opioid prescribing in 2016. Taking those guidelines into account, this team-based learning (TBL) module for third-year medical students on their family medicine clinical clerkship serves as an introductory application for treatment of nociceptive and neuropathic pain.MethodsStudents accessed preparticipation reading material online 1 week before the session. After students had been arranged into groups for the 1-hour module, each student completed an individual readiness assessment test (iRAT). Next, each group completed the group readiness assessment test (gRAT) using Immediate Feedback-Assessment Technique cards to give its answers. To complete the more complex learning objectives, groups answered the multiple-choice team application (tAPP) questions.ResultsOver 2 years, this module was administered to more than 400 students. Average iRAT scores were approximately 80% and gRAT scores nearly 100%. Groups scored approximately 70% on the tAPP questions. Students rated the module on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and provided individual comments. The course always received a score of at least 4, as well as consistent positive feedback.DiscussionThe module can easily be embedded into a preexisting clinical clerkship didactic series. It can also serve as a platform on which to build additional TBL modules following a more longitudinal course and more in-depth skills development in pain management.
| S-EPMC7880255 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionTeam-based learning (TBL) is an instructional method utilized by the University of Alabama School of Medicine to facilitate collaboration and integration of concepts introduced in undergraduate medical training. This TBL was created for the Gastrointestinal module and facilitates understanding of anatomy of the retroperitoneal space, posterior abdominal wall, and neurovasculature of the abdomen. This module integrates topics from abdominal anatomy, radiology, and clinical decision-making for medical students.MethodsPrior to the TBL, students were provided with a set of learning objectives and three instructional video podcasts. During the in-class portion of the activity, learners completed the readiness assurance phase, which consisted of individual and team assessments. During the application phase, teams of five to six students collaborated on multiple-choice questions centered on the presentation, diagnosis, surgical intervention, and palliation of a patient with pancreatic cancer. TBL sessions were cofacilitated by an anatomist and a physician.ResultsSince the TBL's institution in 2014, medical students have consistently performed better on the readiness assurance test in teams rather than individually. On a 5-point Likert scale, over 90% of students in the 2016 (M = 4.12) and 2017 (M = 4.20) Gastrointestinal modules agreed or strongly agreed on an end-of-course evaluation that the TBL activity was effectual for learning.DiscussionIn a medical climate that continues to rely heavily on cross-sectional imaging, early integration of gross anatomy and cross-sectional anatomy is essential and can facilitate acclimation to the clinical years. This TBL would be a valuable addition to other undergraduate medical programs.
| S-EPMC6342382 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionMedical students express frustration that they cannot assemble a comprehensive big picture of how the immune system responds to a microbe and that integration of basic science knowledge, especially across disciplines, with clinical knowledge is difficult. Yet medical student competency requires application of knowledge of immune mechanisms to inform diagnosis and treatment.MethodsA diagram for immune response to extracellular microbes was previously published by MedEdPORTAL in 2011. This diagram has been updated here as a narrated audiovisual module with integrated histopathology. It contains a self-assessment quiz that tests students' understanding of the module followed by a clinical vignette that tests students' ability to apply the concepts in a clinical context. The module was published and usage was tracked via our learning management system. An in-class survey was conducted to gauge students' perceptions of the module.ResultsEighty-two out of 102 (76%) first-year medical students used the module. Over 85% of survey participants felt that the module was a useful resource for learning and reviewing. More than 90% felt that the module helped them to understand the big picture and identify areas for further study.DiscussionThis module assembles a big picture of the immunologic mechanisms involved in a bacterial infection. It was created in response to requests and suggestions by preclinical medical students and used for first-year students during the first few weeks of their training in the basic sciences. This approach integrates multiple disciplines and facilitates students' learning and application of difficult concepts in immunology and pathology.
| S-EPMC6338168 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionCurrent medical education promotes enhanced integration of various disciplines and early exposure to clinically relevant topics. Against this background, we have developed a team-based learning (TBL) module for medical students in the preclerkship period that integrates embryology, anatomy, and radiology of the head and neck region.MethodsThe module, which includes prereading assignments, readiness assurance tests, and an application exercise, focuses on the development of the head and neck region. Students were asked to consolidate their knowledge of the topic-acquired as part of their regular curriculum-and to apply this knowledge to cases of cervical cysts and cleft lip/palate.ResultsThe TBL module was developed for a class of 234 students. The students performed well in the TBL module. Although many students perceived the session as time-consuming, the majority of students evaluated it as relevant for their understanding of the course material and a valuable adjunct to their course.DiscussionTo our knowledge, as of this writing, no TBL modules have been published that focus on the integration of complex embryological topics with anatomy and radiology and that are suitable for medical students at the beginning of their education. Therefore, the presented TBL module fills a gap in material available to educators in the field.
| S-EPMC6440433 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In medical and healthcare-related education, case-based learning (CBL) is a teaching strategy that uses clinical cases to engage students in active learning using course concepts to solve important problems. Here we describe the design and implementation of a CBL module to teach first year medical students about the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), acute retroviral syndrome, clinical progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, HIV diagnostics, assays used to assess stage of disease and response to antiretroviral treatment, and highly active antiretroviral therapy. A team of basic science and clinical faculty in the disciplines of microbiology, immunology, infection prevention and control, clinical medicine, pharmacology, and medical ethics collaboratively designed the CBL module. The results of a questionnaire indicated that the students found the CBL case interesting, engaging, and a useful educational strategy for linking basic science concepts to important clinical problems. In our experience, the CBL promoted student synthesis of basic science concepts across disciplines and engaged learners in the application of basic science knowledge to address significant real-world clinical problems.
| S-EPMC6067042 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMedical students receive limited exposure to the field of plastic surgery because most students will not rotate in plastic surgery, especially those at schools without dedicated plastic surgery residency programs. This study aimed to create and validate a plastic surgery learning module for medical students to dispel media-propagated myths and misrepresentation of the breadth of plastic surgery and equip students with referral-making capabilities.MethodsThe plastic surgery learning module was created using Articulate Storyline 360 (New York, N.Y.). Student participants were recruited from a single medical school across all four classes. Pre- and postmodule surveys were administered via Qualtrics (Provo, Utah). Scores were computed for the general surgical knowledge section and for each specialty referral question.ResultsTwelve students completed usability testing and edits were subsequently made to optimize the module. The module took on average 66 minutes to complete. Sixty-five students (19 MS1, 16 MS2, 15 MS3, 15 MS4) completed efficacy testing. In the premodule survey, students were nearly 100% accurate in identifying breast-related referrals, unlike pediatric/craniofacial (avg: 68%), reconstruction/microsurgery (avg: 64%), and hand/upper extremity (avg: 30%) referrals. Students of all classes exhibited significant improvement in all testing categories except for the breast category, with the most improvement in the hand referrals category. Prior exposure to plastic surgery (57%) correlated with higher premodule hand (P = 0.003) and breast/cosmetic (P = 0.01) referral scores.ConclusionThe plastic surgery learning module shows promise to be a comprehensive yet affordable and time-efficient tool for medical students to learn about basic surgical principles and the scope of plastic surgery.
| S-EPMC8769105 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionThe team-based learning (TBL) instructional strategy promotes learning and retention, enhances student engagement, allows for a deeper understanding of foundational and applied concepts, and helps students' develop lifelong learning skills. The autonomic nervous system (ANS) TBL was created for first-year medical students in the Neuroscience 1 course at Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine.MethodsThe module covered the pathophysiology of ANS-related diseases and therapeutic agents that impact ANS function. By the conclusion of the module, students were able to diagnose different disease processes of the ANS, identify potential complications, and formulate appropriate management strategies. Four faculty members used backward design to create the ANS TBL. The preparatory assignment included reviewing content from previous didactic lectures and consolidating key information in provided tables. Key concepts were evaluated with readiness assurance tests. All application exercises adhered to the 4 S's.ResultsOver the course of 2 years, the class averages for the individual readiness assurance test were 79.8% and 87.6%. The class averages for the team readiness assurance test and application exercises were similar across both years. Course evaluations revealed that students found the TBL relevant and valuable.DiscussionSimilar TBL modules available on MedEdPORTAL are not integrated to include different aspects of the basic and clinical sciences. This ANS TBL was used to help students integrate several essential concepts, including neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and clinical neurology. Students were very enthusiastic and engaged throughout the ANS TBL as it contained relevant case-based scenarios with questions that were meaningful for clinical practice.
| S-EPMC6440417 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Interprofessional collaboration is of great importance in clinical practice, particularly in the field of emergency medicine. The professions involved in providing emergency care must work hand in hand, and tasks and routines must be coordinated effectively. However, medical and nursing students have only few opportunities to experience interprofessional cooperation during their formal training. Addressing this situation, the Department of Anesthesiology and the Vocational School of Greifswald University Medical School initiated a project to increase patient safety by integrating interprofessional human factor training into the curriculum of both health professions. This manuscript addresses how an interprofessional course module focusing on clinical emergency medicine can be taught with an emphasis on competency and problem-solving. In addition, it was important to identify suitable instruments for systematic quality development and assurance of this teaching and learning format.The aim of the project, which took place from October 2013 to September 2015, was the development, implementation and evaluation of a simulation-based, interprofessional course module on clinical emergency medicine. Target groups were medical and nursing students. Modern pedagogical models and methods were applied to the design and teaching of the course content. The project was carried out in separate phases: definition, planning, practical implementation, evaluation and documentation. The project was accompanied by systematic quality development. Established guidelines for quality-centered school development were applied to quality development, assurance and evaluation.Over two years, a 16 credit-hour course module was developed and then taught and evaluated during the 2014 and 2015 summer semesters. A total of 120 medical students and 120 nursing students participated in the course module. Eighteen teachers from medicine and nursing were trained as instructors and assisted by 12 student tutors. Regular evaluations focused on different aspects of the project, using instruments for empirical educational research. Excellent ratings given to the course by the attendees indicate a high degree of satisfaction in both participating professions regarding course design and content, as well as the quality of teaching.In a position paper, the GMA committee on Interprofessional Education in Health Professions issued recommendations for interprofessional education. The recommendations given for teaching and quality assurance are drawn upon here, and relevant examples from the course concept presented.The design of the course corresponds to the recommendations of the GMA committee on Interprofessional Education in the Health Professions. Based on these, and considering the satisfactory evaluations, both continuation and further development of this interprofessional teaching format are justified.
| S-EPMC4895854 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionCancer screenings are key preventive services that patients receive in primary care. Health care professional students are generally taught about major society guidelines and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for cancer screenings. Unfortunately, students and novice providers may view these influential recommendations as a rule book by which to provide care. Experienced providers recognize that not every patient fits neatly into clinical guidelines. Appropriate use of cancer screening entails an understanding of patient preferences, patient-specific health factors, and screening risks and associated pitfalls.MethodsThis 2-hour team-based learning (TBL) session immerses learners in three challenging patient scenarios that are designed to stimulate nuanced discussion of cancer screening using controversial cases. The scenarios encompass the following cases: (1) a 68-year-old man actively seeking prostate cancer screening, (2) a heavy smoker with psychiatric illness and alcoholism being considered for lung cancer screening, and (3) a 42-year-old woman seeking to become pregnant who inquires about breast cancer screening.ResultsThe materials were originally designed for fourth-year students on an ambulatory medicine rotation. Our students universally viewed this activity as a high-quality presentation applicable to their careers. They strongly agreed that the cases facilitated a deeper understanding of the nuances of cancer screening.DiscussionThis TBL encourages learners to critically appraise cancer screening guidelines and apply them to real-life examples. It is applicable for learners who understand the complexities of patient care but still suffer from a guidelines-are-rules mentality.
| S-EPMC6338177 | biostudies-literature