Efficacy, safety, and retention rate of extended-release divalproex versus conventional delayed-release divalproex: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
A novel once-daily divalproex-extended release (VPA-ER) dose formulation has been developed, which prolongs therapeutic serum levels compared with that of twice-daily conventional divalproex-delayed release (VPA-DR). Currently, there is lack of meta-analysis focusing on drug retention rate between VPA-ER and VPA-DR. Thus, our study is the first one that aims to systematically examine and compare the efficacy, safety, and retention rate of VPA-ER and VPA-DR.Methods
Online databases including MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase (up to October 30, 2021) will be applied for literature screen. We will conduct meta-analysis by using Stata16.0 software.Results
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and drug retention rate of VPA-ER versus conventional VPA-DR.Conclusion
Once-daily VPA-ER may present a positive efficacy and not increase the incidence of AEs and has a higher retention rate for patients, which can be used as a substitute for conventional VPA-DR.INPLASY registration number: INPLASY2021110090(DOI: 10.37766/inplasy2021.11.0090).
SUBMITTER: Zhang CQ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8678006 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose: A novel once-daily divalproex-extended release (ER) dose formulation has been developed; this formulation prolongs the therapeutic serum levels of the drug, compared with the twice-daily conventional divalproex-delayed release (DR) formulation. This study aimed to systematically examine and compare the efficacy, safety, and retention rates of the ER divalproex (VPA-ER) and conventional DR divalproex (VPA-DR) formulations. Methods: Randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and medication compliance of ER and DR divalproex were searched in online databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, by searching MeSH words and term words. Observational studies with potential biases were excluded. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software. Findings: Thirteen RCTs, involving 1,028 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. Efficacy, AEs, and drug retention rates were the main study outcomes. According to our study, VPA-ER presented clinically significant benefits compared with the placebo in the population with bipolar disorder (BD) (39.5% versus 27.2%, p < 0.001). A similar efficacy of VPA-ER and VPA-DR in controlling seizures was observed in epilepsy patients (87.4% versus 86.5%, p = 0.769). A significantly lower incidence of AEs was reported in the VPA-ER group than in the placebo group (26.8% versus 34.8%, p = 0.003). By contrast, there was no evidence of difference in safety between VPA-ER and VPA-DR (29.4% versus 30.5%, p = 0.750). In addition, the drug retention rate was significantly lower in the VPA-ER group than in the placebo group (76.0% versus 82.7%, p = 0.020), especially in migraine patients (p = 0.022) and in patients who were treated for fewer than 4 weeks (p = 0.018). Implications: The efficacy of VPA-ER was significantly superior to that of the placebo treatment, which provided efficacy similar to that of conventional VPA-DR. VPA-ER is well tolerated with a low rate of AEs compared to the placebo. In addition, the acceptable medicine compliance of VPA-ER was conducive to the long-term maintenance treatment of chronic diseases. Although we analyzed open labels and crossover design RCTs, large-scale multicenter studies on the efficacy and medicine compliance of new ER formulations with less AEs are required to validate our conclusion.
| S-EPMC9037144 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Evening-dosed HLD200 is a delayed-release and extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH) formulation consisting of uniform, dual-layered microbeads with an inner drug-loaded core. DR/ER-MPH is designed to delay the initial release of drug by 8-10 hours, and thereafter, provide a controlled, extended drug release to target onset of effect upon awakening that lasts into the evening. This phase 3 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of DR/ER-MPH on symptoms and temporal at-home functional impairment in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).This 3-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, forced-dose titration trial evaluated DR/ER-MPH (40-80?mg/day) in children aged 6-12 years with ADHD. Primary efficacy endpoint was the ADHD rating scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV), and the key secondary endpoints were the Before-School Functioning Questionnaire (BSFQ), and Parent Rating of Evening and Morning Behavior-Revised, morning (PREMB-R AM) and evening (PREMB-R PM). Safety measures included spontaneously reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and two TEAEs of special interest, appetite suppression and insomnia (with direct questioning on sleep disturbance).One hundred sixty-one participants were included in the intent-to-treat population (DR/ER-MPH, n?=?81; placebo, n?=?80). After 3 weeks, DR/ER-MPH achieved significant improvements versus placebo in ADHD symptoms (least-squares [LS] mean ADHD-RS-IV: 24.1 vs. 31.2; p?=?0.002), and at-home early morning (LS mean BSFQ: 18.7 vs. 28.4; p?<?0.001; LS mean PREMB-R AM: 2.1 vs. 3.6; p?<?0.001) and late afternoon/evening (LS mean PREMB-R PM: 9.4 vs. 12.2; p?=?0.002) functional impairment. Commonly reported TEAEs (?10%) were insomnia and decreased appetite.DR/ER-MPH was generally well tolerated and demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in ADHD symptoms and at-home functional impairments in the early morning, late afternoon, and evening in children with ADHD.
| S-EPMC5567875 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Maintaining consistent levodopa benefits while simultaneously controlling dyskinesia can be difficult. Recently, an amantadine delayed release/extended release (DR/ER) formulation (Gocovri®) indicated for dyskinesia received additional FDA approval as an adjunct to levodopa for the treatment of OFF episodes. We evaluated OFF time reductions with amantadine-DR/ER in a pooled analysis of two phase III amantadine-DR/ER trials (NCT02136914, NCT02274766) followed by a 2-year open-label extension trial (NCT02202551). OFF outcomes were analyzed for the mITT population, as well as stratified by baseline OFF time of ≥2.5 h/day or <2.5 h/day. At Week 12, mean placebo-subtracted treatment difference in OFF time was -1.00 [-1.57, -0.44] h in the mITT population (n = 196), -1.2 [-2.08, -0.32] h in the ≥2.5 h subgroup (n = 102) and -0.77 [-1.49, -0.06] in the <2.5 h subgroup (n = 94). Amantadine-DR/ER-treated participants showed reduced MDS-UPDRS Part IV motor fluctuation subscores by week 2 that were maintained below baseline to Week 100.
| S-EPMC8933492 | biostudies-literature
Project description:UnlabelledDosing regimens of oral bisphosphonates are inconvenient and contribute to poor compliance. The bone mineral density response to a once weekly delayed-release formulation of risedronate given before or following breakfast was non-inferior to traditional immediate-release risedronate given daily before breakfast. Delayed-release risedronate is a convenient regimen for oral bisphosphonate therapy.IntroductionWe report the results of a randomized, controlled, clinical study assessing the efficacy and safety of a delayed-release (DR) 35 mg weekly oral formulation of risedronate that allows patients to take their weekly risedronate dose before or immediately after breakfast.MethodsWomen with postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive risedronate 5 mg immediate-release (IR) daily (n = 307) at least 30 min before breakfast, or risedronate 35 mg DR weekly, either at least 30 min before breakfast (BB, n = 308) or immediately following breakfast (FB, n = 307). Bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover markers (BTMs), fractures, and adverse events were evaluated. The primary efficacy variable was percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD at Endpoint.ResultsTwo hundred fifty-seven subjects (83.7%) in the IR daily group, 252 subjects (82.1%) in the DR FB weekly group, and 258 subjects (83.8%) in the DR BB weekly group completed 1 year. Both DR weekly groups were determined to be non-inferior to the IR daily regimen. Mean percent changes in hip BMD were similar across groups. The magnitude of BTM response was similar across groups; some statistical differences were seen that were small and deemed by investigators to have no major clinical importance. The incidence of adverse events leading to withdrawal and serious adverse events were similar across treatment groups. All three regimens were well tolerated.ConclusionsRisedronate 35 mg DR weekly is similar in efficacy and safety to risedronate 5 mg IR daily, and will allow patients to take their weekly risedronate dose immediately after breakfast.
| S-EPMC3249191 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) is rare: only 1.5-5% of MS cases are diagnosed before 18 years of age, and data on disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for pediatric MS are limited. The CONNECTED study assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of treatment with delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral MS DMT, in pediatric patients with MS. Methods: CONNECTED is the 96-week extension to FOCUS, a 24-week phase 2 study of patients aged 13-17 years; participants received DMF 240 mg twice daily. Endpoints included (primary) incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and DMF discontinuations due to an AE, and (secondary) T2 hyperintense lesion incidence by magnetic resonance imaging and annualized relapse rate (ARR). Results: Twenty participants [median (range) age, 17 (14-18) years; 65% female] who completed FOCUS enrolled into CONNECTED; 17 (85%) completed CONNECTED. Eighteen participants (90%) experienced AEs: the most frequent was flushing (25%). None experienced infections or fever related to low lymphocyte counts. Three participants experienced four serious AEs; none led to DMF discontinuation. Twelve of 17 participants (71%) had no new/newly enlarged T2 lesions from weeks 16-24, two (12%) had one, and one each (6%) had two, three, or five or more lesions [median (range), 0 (0-6)]. Over the full 120-week treatment period, ARR was 0.2, an 84.5% relative reduction (n = 20; 95% confidence interval: 66.8-92.8; p < 0.0001) vs. the year before DMF initiation. Conclusions: The long-term safety and efficacy observed in CONNECTED was consistent with adults, suggesting pediatric and adolescent patients with MS might benefit from DMF treatment.
| S-EPMC7812971 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Worldwide, prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common malignancy in males. We undertook a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a transperitoneal (TLRP) approach, versus that of an extraperitoneal (ELRP) approach, for treatment of localized PCa. A comprehensive literature search retrieved 14 publications, with a total of 1715 patients. Meta-analysis of these studies showed that an ELRP approach was associated with a significantly shorter postoperative catheterization time (MD: 1.99; 95% CI: 0.52 to 3.54; P = 0.008), less blood transfusion rate (OR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.06; P = 0.04), shorter intestinal function recovery time (MD: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.09; P < 0.0001) and shorter hospitalization days (MD: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.03 to 4.39; P = 0.002). In addition, our results showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups in operation time (MD: 19.39; 95% CI: -6.67 to 45.44; P = 0.014), intraoperative blood loss (MD: 4.89; 95% CI: -105.00 to 114.79; P = 0.93) and total complication rate (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.74; P = 0.27). In summary, our meta-analysis showed that ELRP is likely to be a safe and feasible alternative for localized PCa patients compared with TLRP.
| S-EPMC4602188 | biostudies-other
Project description:Background and purposeTo assess the long-term safety and efficacy of pramipexole as a once-daily (q.d.) extended-release oral formulation in early or advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsIn two double-blind (DB) studies of early PD and one of advanced PD,active-treatment arms received pramipexole immediate release (IR) or extended release (ER), with exposure lasting up to 33 weeks. In open-label (OL) extensions that followed immediately, subjects took ER q.d. for up to 80 weeks, with dosage adjustment permitted (range 0.375-4.5 mg q.d.).ResultsOf 590 subjects completing an early-PD DB study, 511 entered the early-PD OL extension; 408 completed it. Reported adverse events (AEs) with incidence ≥10.0% were somnolence (15.1%), peripheral edema (11.7%) and back pain (10.6%). Of 465 subjects completing the advanced-PD DB study, 391 entered the advanced-PD OL extension; 329 completed it. Reported AEs with incidence ≥10.0%were dyskinesia (27.4%) and somnolence (13.6%). Impulse control disorders were identified by semi-structured interview in 13 subjects (1.4% of 902). In exploratory analyses, adjusted mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) PartsII + III scores (excluding ex-placebo recipients) remained substantially improved from DB baseline scores prior to pramipexole introduction, at -6.6 and -6.3 points amongst ex-DB-ER and ex-DB-IR recipients after 113 weeks of pramipexole (33 DB plus 80 OL) in early PD, and -11.5 and -9.1 after up to 113 weeks (up to 33 DB plus 80 OL) in advanced PD.ConclusionsThese results support the long-term safety and efficacy of pramipexole ER in early and advanced PD. AEs were typical for dopaminergic medications, and UPDRS scores suggested sustained symptomatic benefit.
| S-EPMC4282380 | biostudies-literature
Project description:This phase 3, laboratory classroom study assessed the efficacy and safety of methylphenidate hydrochloride extended-release chewable tablets (MPH ERCT) compared with placebo in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Following a 6-week, open-label, dose-optimization period, children 6-12 years of age (n?=?90) with ADHD were randomly assigned to double-blind MPH ERCT at the final optimized dose (20-60?mg/day) or placebo. After 1 week of double-blind treatment, efficacy was assessed predose and 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 13 hours postdose in a laboratory classroom setting. The primary efficacy measure was the average of postdose Swanson, Kotkin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham (SKAMP) Rating Scale-Combined scores, analyzed using a mixed-model, repeated-measures analysis. Secondary efficacy measures included Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) total number of problems attempted and total number of problems correct. Safety assessments included adverse event (AE) monitoring and the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).MPH ERCT treatment statistically significantly reduced the average of all postdose SKAMP-Combined scores versus placebo (least-squares mean difference [95% confidence interval], -7.0 [-10.9, -3.1]; p?<?0.001). Statistically significant treatment differences in SKAMP-Combined scores were observed at 2 hours postdose through 8 hours postdose (p-values <0.001). Statistically significant differences between MPH ERCT and placebo in PERMP total number of problems attempted and total number of problems correct were observed at 0.75 hours postdose through 8 hours postdose (p-values ?0.049). Common AEs in the open-label period (?5%) were decreased appetite, upper abdominal pain, mood swings, irritability, insomnia, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), dysgeusia, and headache; URTI was the only AE reported by >1 subject receiving MPH ERCT in the double-blind period (placebo: URTI, contusion, wound, and initial insomnia). No suicidal ideation or behavior was reported on the C-SSRS at baseline or at any postbaseline assessment.MPH ERCT 20-60?mg significantly improved ADHD symptoms compared with placebo at 2 hours postdose through at least 8 hours postdose. MPH ERCT was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with other MPH ER formulations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01654250. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01654250 .
| S-EPMC5651935 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA long-acting κreceptor agonist parenteral analgesic may theoretically improve acute pain and reduce incidence of chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with minimal drug-related side effects of the traditional μreceptor opioids.MethodsEighty adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive single intramuscular injection of an extended-release sebacoyl dinalbuphine ester (SDE, Naldebain 150 mg; n = 40) or placebo (n = 40) after anesthesia induction. Standard multimodal analgesia (MMA) was administered for postoperative pain control. The primary endpoint was pain intensity within 7 days after surgery. The secondary endpoints were incidence CPSP at 3 months and adverse reactions up to 7 days after surgery.ResultsThe highest visual analogue scale (VAS) and area under the curve of VAS 0 to 48 hours after operation were not different between the two groups and a similar proportion of patients requested rescue parenteral analgesics. Average pain intensities were also not different at 72 hours and 7 days after surgery. Incidence of CPSP was 22.5% and 13.1% in patients who received placebo and SDE treatment, respectively (P = .379). Significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse events, including dizziness, nausea and injection site reactions, were recorded in the SDE group.ConclusionA single dose of extended-release analgesic SDE given intraoperatively did not provide sufficient add-on effect for acute and chronic pain management after laparoscopic cholecystectomies in patients who received standard postoperative MMA. Intramuscular injection of 150 mg SDE in patients with average body mass causes adverse events that could have been overlooked. More clinical studies are warranted to determine the target populations who may benefit from SDE injections for improvement of acute and chronic postsurgical pain management.
| S-EPMC10403043 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundProton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most effective drugs for treating acid-related disorders. However, once-daily dosing with conventional PPIs fail to fully control acid secretion over 24 h. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of HIP1601 (dual delayed-release esomeprazole) and HGP1705 (delayed-release esomeprazole) in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE).MethodsWe enrolled 213 patients with EE randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 40 mg HIP1601 (n = 107) or HGP1705 (n = 106) once daily for 4 or 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the EE healing rate, confirmed by endoscopy up to week 8. GERD-related symptoms and treatment-emergent adverse events were compared between both groups.ResultsBy week 8, the estimated healing rates of EE were 97.8% and 96.8% in the HIP1601 and HGP1705 groups, respectively, with a 95% confidence interval of -4.7 to 7.2. After 4 or 8 weeks of treatment, the EE healing rate at week 4, complete resolution rate of symptoms, time to sustained resolution of symptoms, and number of rescue medications used were similar in both groups. The proportion of heartburn- and acid regurgitation-free nights by week 4 were higher in the HIP1601 group compared to the HGP1705 group, but the difference did not reach clinical significance (87.7% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.514, 87.5% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.774). The number of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.ConclusionsThe efficacy and safety of HIP1601 40 mg were comparable to those of HGP1705 40 mg for the treatment of EE and symptomatic improvement of GERD.Trial registrationNCT04080726 ( https://classic.Clinicaltrialsgov/ct2/show/NCT04080726 ), registration date: 25/10/2018.
| S-EPMC10729464 | biostudies-literature