Dataset Information

Exploration of Lung Cancer-Related Genetic Factors via Mendelian Randomization Method Based on Genomic and Transcriptomic Summarized Data.

ABSTRACT: Lung carcinoma is one of the most deadly malignant tumors in mankind. With the rising incidence of lung cancer, searching for the high effective cures become more and more imperative. There has been sufficient research evidence that living habits and situations such as smoking and air pollution are associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. Simultaneously, the influence of individual genetic susceptibility on lung carcinoma morbidity has been confirmed, and a growing body of evidence has been accumulated on the relationship between various risk factors and the risk of different pathological types of lung cancer. Additionally, the analyses from many large-scale cancer registries have shown a degree of familial aggregation of lung cancer. To explore lung cancer-related genetic factors, Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have been used to identify several lung cancer susceptibility sites and have been widely validated. However, the biological mechanism behind the impact of these site mutations on lung cancer remains unclear. Therefore, this study applied the Summary data-based Mendelian Randomization (SMR) model through the integration of two GWAS datasets and four expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) datasets to identify susceptibility genes. Using this strategy, we found ten of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) sites that affect the occurrence and development of lung tumors by regulating the expression of seven genes. Further analysis of the signaling pathway about these genes not only provides important clues to explain the pathogenesis of lung cancer but also has critical significance for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer.

SUBMITTER: Cheng N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8686495 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundUrolithiasis is a highly prevalent global disease closely associated with metabolic factors; however, the causal relationship between blood metabolites and urolithiasis remains poorly understood.MethodIn our study, we employed a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the causal associations between urolithiasis and metabolites. The random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) estimation method was utilized as the primary approach, complemented by several other estimators including MR-Egger, weighted median, colocalization and MR-PRESSO. Furthermore, the study included replication and meta-analysis. Finally, we conducted metabolic pathway analysis to elucidate potential metabolic pathways.ResultsAfter conducting multiple tests for correction, glycerol might contribute to the urolithiasis and dehydroisoandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) might inhibit this process. Furthermore, several blood metabolites had shown potential associations with a causal relationship. Among the protective metabolites were lipids (dehydroisoandrosterone sulfate and 1-stearoylglycerol (1-monostearin)), amino acids (isobutyrylcarnitine and 2-aminobutyrate), a keto acid (acetoacetate) and a carbohydrate (mannose). The risk metabolites included lipids (1-palmitoylglycerophosphoethanolamine, glycerol and cortisone), a carbohydrate (erythronate), a peptide (pro-hydroxy-pro) and a fatty acid (eicosenoate). In reverse MR analysis, urolithiasis demonstrated a statistically significant causal relationship with butyrylcarnitine, 3-methyl-2-oxobutyrate, scyllo-inositol, leucylleucine and leucylalanine. However, it was worth noting that none of the blood metabolites exhibited statistical significance after multiple corrections. Additionally, we identified one metabolic pathway associated with urolithiasis.ConclusionThe results we obtained demonstrate the causal relevance between two metabolites and urolithiasis, as well as identify one metabolic pathway potentially associated with its development. Given the high prevalence of urolithiasis, further investigations are encouraged to elucidate the mechanisms of these metabolites and explore novel therapeutic strategies.

Project description:BackgroundLung cancer is the major cause of mortality in tumor patients. While its incidence rate has recently declined, it is still far from satisfactory and its potential modifiable risk factors should be explored.MethodsWe performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to investigate the causal relationship between potentially modifiable risk factors (namely smoking behavior, alcohol intake, anthropometric traits, blood pressure, lipidemic traits, glycemic traits, and fasting insulin) and lung cancer. Besides, a bi-directional MR analysis was carried out to disentangle the complex relationship between different risk factors. Inverse-variance weighted (IVW) was utilized to combine the estimation for each SNP. Cochrane's Q value was used to evaluate heterogeneity and two methods, including MR-Egger intercept and MR-PRESSO, were adopted to detect horizontal pleiotropy.ResultsThree kinds of smoking behavior were all causally associated with lung cancer. Overall, smokers were more likely to suffer from lung cancer compared with non-smokers (OR = 2.58 [1.95, 3.40], p-value = 2.07 x 10-11), and quitting smoking could reduce the risk (OR = 4.29[2.60, 7.07], p-value = 1.23 x 10-8). Furthermore, we found a dose-response relationship between the number of cigarettes and lung cancer (OR = 6.10 [5.35, 6.96], p-value = 4.43x10-161). Lower HDL cholesterol could marginally increase the risk of lung cancer, but become insignificant after Bonferroni correction (OR = 0.82 [0.68, 1.00], p-value = 0.045). In addition, we noted no direct causal relationship between other risk factors and lung cancer. Neither heterogeneity nor pleiotropy was observed in this study. However, when treating the smoking behavior as the outcome, we found the increased BMI could elevate the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.139[0.104, 0.175], p-value = 1.99x10-14) and a similar effect was observed for the waist circumference and hip circumference. Additionally, the elevation of SBP could also marginally increase the number of cigarettes per day (beta = 0.001 [0.0002, 0.002], p-value = 0.018).ConclusionSmoking behavior might be the most direct and effective modifiable way to reduce the risk of lung cancer. Meanwhile, smoking behavior can be affected by other risk factors, especially obesity.

Dataset Information

Exploration of Lung Cancer-Related Genetic Factors via Mendelian Randomization Method Based on Genomic and Transcriptomic Summarized Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets