Dataset Information

Accuracy of Opportunistic Bone Mineral Density Assessment on Staging Computed Tomography for Gynaecological Cancers.

ABSTRACT: Background and Objectives: Women with gynecological cancers constitute a high-risk cohort for loss of bone density. International guidance stipulates women undergoing cancer treatments associated with bone loss should have a quantitative assessment of bone density. Access to Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is limited. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of opportunistic bone density measurement on staging computed tomography (CT) scans for gynaecological malignancies, in comparison to the gold standard DXA. Materials and Methods: Women with a staging CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis for a new diagnosis of gynecological cancer were recruited. DXA was performed within 6 weeks of treatment for gynaecological cancer. Lumbar bone density was measured by CT attenuation values, in Hounsfield units (HU), of the anterior trabecular region. Correlations between CT and DXA parameters were analysed. Receiver Operating Characteristic(ROC) curves for diagnosis of low bone density and osteoporosis were analysed. Results: Final cohort included 48 of 50 women recruited. There was good diagnostic accuracy for abnormal bone density and osteoporosis, with areas under the ROC curve at L1 of 0.77 (p = 0.002) and 0.80 (p = 0.020) respectively. CT-HU of 170-190 yielded sensitivities of 87-90%, positive predictive values of 75-84% and negative predictive values of 71-75% for the diagnosis of low bone mineral density. CT-HU of 90-110 yielded specificities of 85-93% for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Moderate correlations were found between CT-HU and both DXA T-scores and diagnostic categories. Conclusions: This is the first study to assess the opportunistic application of CT in the assessment of bone health in women with gynaecological cancer, a cohort at high-risk of osteoporosis. The correlation between bone density assessment in CT-HU and DXA, and strong AUC values for the diagnosis of low bone density (0.77) and osteoporosis (0.80) support this pragmatic solution in resolving the care-gap in cancer treatment-induced bone loss, often associated with poor access to DXA.

SUBMITTER: O'Gorman CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8703431 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe update in technology may impact the accuracy in measuring bone mineral density (BMD). However, the application of the new fast kilovoltage (kV)-switching dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for BMD measurement has not yet been reported. This study aimed to examine the accuracy and precision of the new fast kV-switching DECT in measuring BMD and to evaluate its applicability in clinical BMD measurement.MethodsForty sets of the new fast kV-switching DECT scans and one quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scan were performed on the European Spine Phantom. Their relative errors and relative standard deviations were compared. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent chest plain DECT and abdominal monoenergetic plain CT at the same time. The relationship between hydroxyapatite-water and hydroxyapatite-fat measured using DECT and BMD measured using QCT was analyzed by multivariate regression analysis.ResultsThe relative errors of the new fast kV-switching DECT with low tube speeds (0.8 and 1.0 s/r) were all less than 6% and were less than those of QCT, except for those at 515 mA. The relative standard deviation values with high tube rotation speeds (0.5 and 0.6 s/r) were higher than those with low tube speeds (0.8 and 1.0 s/r) under most tube current conditions. The new fast kV-switching DECT-derived BMD values corrected by multiple linear regression (predicted hydroxyapatite) were significantly positively correlated with the QCT-based BMD values (R2=0.912; P<0.001). The results of the Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated high consistency between the 2 measurement methods.ConclusionsResults of the phantom measurements indicated that the new fast kV-switching DECT could measure BMD with relatively high accuracy and precision. The results of a subsequent clinical in vivo experiment demonstrated that vertebral BMD measurements derived from DECT and QCT were mostly consistent and highly accurate. Therefore, patients who undergo DECT for other clinical indications can simultaneously have their BMD determined.

Project description:BackgroundMuscle weakness is a key factor in the increase risk of falls and might also play a significant role in the increase of risk of hip fracture. Computed tomography-measured muscle size and muscle density are well-established imaging biomarkers used in studies of physical function, frailty or cancer, but limited to hip fracture. In particular, it is warranted to have a better understanding of the performance of muscle size and density in the discrimination of acute hip fractures. We also aim to determine age-related differences of muscle size and density in healthy controls and hip fracture patients.MethodsFour hundred thirty-eight low-energy acute hip fracture cases and 316 healthy controls from the China Action on Spine and Hip Status study were included in the study. Muscle cross-sectional area and density were measured for the gluteus maximus and gluteus medius and minimus. Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the femoral neck and total hip was measured. Using propensity score matching, we generated three samples with cases and controls matched for age, body mass index, and gender: femoral neck fracture (FNF), intertrochanteric fracture (ITF), and any hip fracture vs. controls, respectively.ResultsHandgrip strength, gluteus muscle area and density, and bone parameters of the matched hip fracture groups were lower than those of the correspondence control groups, respectively (P < 0.05). The univariate analysis showed that associations of aBMD with FNF and with ITF were significantly weaker than associations between fracture and muscle parameters. Gluteus medius and minimus muscle density showed the highest areas under the curve (AUC) with FNF (0.88, 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.92) and trochanteric fracture (0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.92-0.97). The model including all muscle and bone parameters provided the highest AUC (FNF: AUC 0.912; ITF: AUC 0.958), and AUC results of another selected model without muscle density showed that association with fracture significantly dropped (FNF: AUC 0.755; ITF: AUC 0.858). Separate results for the two age groups younger and older than 70 years showed no age-related significant differences in discriminate models.ConclusionsMuscle density performs better than aBMD from hip computed tomography X-ray absorptiometry and muscle size in discrimination of hip fracture. Combination of aBMD and muscle density provided the best discrimination. The integration of muscle assessments may trigger a paradigm shift in hip fracture prediction. Gluteus muscle density should also be evaluated as treatment outcome.

Project description:BackgroundThe early detection and treatment of osteoporosis can help prevent osteoporosis-related fractures, especially in patients who undergo enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans for disease diagnosis or evaluation of treatment outcomes. Although Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement of the vertebral body has been shown to have a strong positive correlation with bone mineral density (BMD), the contrast media will impact the CT value of the vertebral body and decrease the accuracy. This study is aimed to examine the distinctions in vertebral body CT attenuation measurement on true unenhanced (TUE) and virtual unenhanced (VUE) images generated from triphasic enhanced dual-energy CT (DECT) scans and to determine the feasibility of assessing BMD and detecting osteoporosis on VUE images as compared to quantitative CT (QCT).MethodsA total of 235 patients underwent abdominal CT examinations that included unenhanced (with 120 kVp and Smart mA) and triphasic enhanced DECT scans. The BMD and CT attenuation values of the L1-L2 vertebrae were measured on TUE and VUE images reconstructed from the triphasic enhanced CT. The differences and associations between TUE and VUE generated from triphasic enhanced CT were analyzed. The diagnostic performances of HU measurements obtained from TUE and VUE images were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsThe BMD and HU measurements of the vertebrae showed good interobserver repeatability on both TUE and VUE images (all intercorrelation coefficients >0.92). The CT attenuation values of L1 and L2 and their average value showed no statistically significant difference among the triphasic VUE images (F=0.121, F=0.061, F=0.090; all P values >0.05) but were significantly lower than those obtained from the TUE images. HU measurements in both the TUE and triphasic VUE images, along with the reference BMD derived from QCT, demonstrated a strong positive correlation (rTUE =0.981, rVUEa =0.966, rVUEv =0.962, rVUEd =0.964; all P values <0.05), with excellent diagnostic performance for the diagnoses of osteoporosis and osteopenia (all areas under curve >0.95). The Bland-Altman scatter plot exhibited good agreement, as the deviations between the reference BMD and the calculated BMD were evenly distributed around 0.ConclusionsAlthough the attenuation values of the vertebrae on the VUE images were underestimated compared to those on the TUE images, the HU measurement on VUE image was effective in assessing BMD and detecting osteoporosis and osteopenia with good diagnostic performance.

Dataset Information

Accuracy of Opportunistic Bone Mineral Density Assessment on Staging Computed Tomography for Gynaecological Cancers.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets