Who 'nose', is it the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor?: a case series of persistent nasal pruritus in heart failure patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Sacubitril/valsartan is approved for the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40% to decrease mortality and morbidity. Nasal pruritus is not a recognized adverse effect in the product information. In this case series, we encountered three patients who presented with nasal pruritus that improved after discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan.Case summary
Three patients aged 58-73 years-old presented with pruritus at the nasal septum post-initiation of sacubitril/valsartan. The pruritus did not subside despite the use of anti-histamines. Within 3-6 months, all individuals discontinued sacubitril/valsartan with complete resolution of their nasal pruritus.Discussion
Many physicians may not aware of this unusual but reversible adverse effect of sacubitril/valsartan. Despite the positive prognostic value of sacubitril/valsartan, the constant nasal pruritus had impacted the quality of life of our patients, leading them to discontinue sacubitril/valsartan permanently.
SUBMITTER: Gan J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8717058 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BACKGROUND:Angiotensin II has been implicated in maladaptive right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy and fibrosis associated with pulmonary hypertension (PH). Natriuretic peptides decrease RV afterload by promoting pulmonary vasodilation and inhibiting vascular remodeling but are degraded by neprilysin. We hypothesized that angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor, sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val, LCZ696), will attenuate PH and improve RV function by targeting both pulmonary vascular and RV remodeling. METHODS:PH was induced in rats using the SU5416/hypoxia model (Su/Hx), followed by 6-week treatment with placebo, Sac/Val, or Val alone. There were 4 groups: CON-normoxic animals with placebo (n=18); PH-Su/Hx rats+placebo (n=34); PH+Sac/Val (N=24); and PH+Val (n=16). RESULTS:In animals with PH, treatment with Sac/Val but not Val resulted in significant reduction in RV pressure (mm?Hg: PH: 62±4, PH+Sac/Val: 46±5), hypertrophy (RV/LV+S: PH: 0.74±0.06, PH+Sac/Val: 0.46±0.06), collagen content (µg/50 µg protein: PH: 8.2±0.3, PH+Sac/Val: 6.4±0.4), pressures and improvement in RVs (mm/s: PH: 31.2±1.8, PH+Sac/Val: 43.1±3.6) compared with placebo. This was associated with reduced pulmonary vascular wall thickness, increased lung levels of ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide), BNP (brain-type natriuretic peptide), and cGMP, and decreased plasma endothelin-1 compared with PH alone. Also, PH+Sac/Val animals had altered expression of PKC isozymes in RV tissue compared with PH alone. CONCLUSIONS:Sac/Val reduces pulmonary pressures, vascular remodeling, as well as RV hypertrophy in a rat model of PH and may be appropriate for treatment of pulmonary hypertension and RV dysfunction.
| S-EPMC6857845 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDoxorubicin (DOX) induces cardiotoxicity in part by activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) exerts additive cardioprotective actions over renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in preclinical models of myocardial infarction and in heart failure patients. We hypothesized that Sac/Val would be more cardioprotective than Val in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, and this benefit would be associated with modulation of MMP activation.ObjectivesWe sought to investigate the efficacy of Sac/Val for the treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.MethodsMale Wistar rats received DOX intraperitoneally (15 mg/kg cumulative) or saline over 3 weeks. Following the first treatment, control animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), while DOX-treated animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), Val (31 mg/kg; n = 25) or Sac/Val (68 mg/kg; n = 25) for either 4 or 6 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, and 4 and 6 weeks after DOX initiation. In addition, myocardial MMP activity was assessed with 99mTc-RP805, and cardiotoxicity severity was assessed by histology at these time points in a subgroup of animals.ResultsLeft ventricular ejection fraction decreased by 10% at 6 weeks in DOX and DOX + Val rats (both p < 0.05), while this reduction was attenuated in DOX + Sac/Val rats. MMP activity was increased at 6 weeks by 76% in DOX-alone rats, and tended to increase in DOX + Val rats (36%; p = 0.051) but was similar in DOX + Sac/Val rats as compared with time-matched control animals. Both therapies attenuated histological evidence of cellular toxicity and fibrosis (p < 0.05).ConclusionsSac/Val offers greater protection against left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction compared with standard angiotensin receptor blocker therapy in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.
| S-EPMC7799406 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Heart failure (HF) is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the heart cannot pump enough blood and oxygen to meet the body's needs. It affects mostly the elderly, commonly from the male population, especially those with obesity, diabetes, or some other chronic condition. It can be treated with different medications, and promising results were shown by a relatively new medicament called Entresto. Results obtained from molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations to examine the inhibitory capacity of Entresto are presented in this study. Parameters obtained by the molecular docking simulations show that both parts of Entresto (sacubitril (SAC) and valsartan (VAL)) interact with targeted proteins, and inhibit their physiological function. Simulations of molecular dynamics revealed some interesting inhibitory patterns. SAC was discovered to produce structural alterations in neprilysin by binding to it, reducing neprilysin's physiological activity. In addition to blocking the active site, SAC binding causes the enzyme's structure to become less compact over time, causing changes in its biochemical characteristics and preventing the enzyme from performing its biological function. Similar to SAC, VAL also causes deviations in the structure of angiotensin receptors. The angiotensin receptor GPCR (G-protein-coupled receptors) is immersed in the lipid bilayer, and changes in the tertiary structure are only visible through RMSD and RMSF, not by examining R g. In this regard, MD simulations validated the results of molecular docking simulations, demonstrating that both SAC and VAL had inhibitory potential towards the neprilysin and angiotensin receptors, respectively.
| S-EPMC9575392 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization and improve symptoms among patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction compared to enalapril, the gold standard angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. In the 5 years since the publication of the results of PARADIGM-HF, further insight has been gained into integrating a neprilysin inhibitor into a comprehensive multidrug regimen, including a renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAS) blocker. This paper reviews the current understanding of the effects of sacubitril/valsartan and highlights expected developments over the next 5 years, including potential new indications for use. Additionally, a practical, evidence-based approach is provided to the clinical integration of sacubitril/valsartan among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
| S-EPMC8837825 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Although patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular events, adequate drug therapies for preventing the deterioration of these conditions are still not established. This study was undertaken to evaluate a preventive effect of an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), which is converted to sacubitril and valsartan in the body, against the progression of renal disease in rats with subtotal nephrectomy, an animal model of human CKD. Mean survival time after subtotal nephrectomy was about 100 days in Wistar rats with vehicle. LCZ696-(30 mg/kg) and valsartan-(15 mg/kg) prolonged the survival of these animals, and the effect of LCZ696 on survival was significantly greater than that of valsartan. Renoprotective effects of LCZ696 judged by serum creatinine and urinary protein excretions were larger than those of valsartan. Cardioprotective effects judged by cardiac left ventricular mass, fractional shortening, and fibrosis of LCZ696 and valsartan were not detected under the present condition. Thus, the renoprotective effect of LCZ696 was stronger than that of valsartan in rats with subtotal nephrectomy. This study provides the idea that, compared to valsartan, LCZ696 is more effective for the treatment of human CKD.
| S-EPMC5684857 | biostudies-other
Project description:Increased activation of the renin-angiotensin system is involved in the onset and progression of cardiometabolic diseases, while natriuretic peptides (NP) may exert protective effects. We have recently demonstrated that sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696), a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, which blocks the angiotensin II type-1 receptor and augments natriuretic peptide levels, improved peripheral insulin sensitivity in obese hypertensive patients. Here, we investigated the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (400 mg QD) treatment for 8 weeks on the abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (AT) phenotype compared to the metabolically neutral comparator amlodipine (10 mg QD) in 70 obese hypertensive patients. Abdominal subcutaneous AT biopsies were collected before and after intervention to determine the AT transcriptome and expression of proteins involved in lipolysis, NP signaling and mitochondrial oxidative metabolism. Both sacubitril/valsartan and amlodipine treatment did not significantly induce AT transcriptional changes in pathways related to lipolysis, NP signaling and oxidative metabolism. Furthermore, protein expression of adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL) (Ptime*group = 0.195), hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) (Ptime*group = 0.458), HSL-ser660 phosphorylation (Ptime*group = 0.340), NP receptor-A (NPRA) (Ptime*group = 0.829) and OXPHOS complexes (Ptime*group = 0.964) remained unchanged. In conclusion, sacubitril/valsartan treatment for 8 weeks did not alter the abdominal subcutaneous AT transcriptome and expression of proteins involved in lipolysis, NP signaling and oxidative metabolism in obese hypertensive patients.
| S-EPMC5834447 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Inhibition of neurohumoural pathways such as the renin angiotensin aldosterone and sympathetic nervous systems is central to the understanding and treatment of heart failure (HF). Conversely, until recently, potentially beneficial augmentation of neurohumoural systems such as the natriuretic peptides has had limited therapeutic success. Administration of synthetic natriuretic peptides has not improved outcomes in acute HF but modulation of the natriuretic system through inhibition of the enzyme that degrades natriuretic (and other vasoactive) peptides, neprilysin, has proven to be successful. After initial failures with neprilysin inhibition alone or dual neprilysin-angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, the Prospective comparison of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF) trial demonstrated that morbidity and mortality can be improved with the angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan (formerly LCZ696). In comparison to the ACE inhibitor enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the occurrence of the primary end point (cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for HF) by 20% with a 16% reduction in all-cause mortality. These findings suggest that sacubitril/valsartan should replace an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker as the foundation of treatment of symptomatic patients (NYHA II-IV) with HF and a reduced ejection fraction. This review will explore the background to neprilysin inhibition in HF, the results of the PARADIGM-HF trial and offer guidance on how to use sacubitril/valsartan in clinical practice.
| S-EPMC5013095 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAngiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy has been associated with improved survival for patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).ObjectivesWe performed a meta-analysis of arrhythmia endpoints from studies comparing ARNI with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for patients with HFrEF to assess for incremental benefit.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Baseline study characteristics were collected and outcomes were sustained ventricular arrhythmias, atrial arrhythmias, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and biventricular (BiV) pacing rate.ResultsWe included 9 studies, 4 randomized trials, and 5 observational studies (5589 patients on ARNI vs 5615 on ACEIs/ARBs). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 51 months. The mean age was 65.4 ± 9.8 years, with 77.3% male patients and a mean ejection fraction of 29.0% ± 7.6%. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 62% of patients. In the ARNI group, there were less SCD (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.96; P = .02), ventricular arrhythmias (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.79; P = .005), and appropriate ICD therapy (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.74; P = .004). Higher rates of BiV pacing were seen (mean difference 3.13, 95% CI 2.58-3.68; P < .00001) when compared with ACEIs/ARBs. No difference in atrial arrhythmias was seen.ConclusionARNI therapy provides incremental benefit with respect to ventricular tachyarrhythmias/SCD, which may, in part, explain improved outcomes in patients with HFrEF compared to ACEIs/ARBs. There was increased BiV pacing and decreased ICD therapy in the ARNI group.
| S-EPMC8710618 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction.Methods and resultsData were obtained from the Chang Gung Research Database. The cohort entry date of the ARB group was assigned as that of the ARNI group to avoid immortal time bias. Additionally, 1:1 propensity score matching based on age, sex, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction was conducted. The expectation-maximization imputation method with inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to compare outcomes between the two groups. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for worsening HF. Patients who received ARNI therapy had a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome occurring than patients who received ARBs (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.96). The reduction of hospitalization for worsening HF contributed most to the primary outcome benefits. In addition to the primary outcome, the ARNI group had a significantly lower risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction. The improvement of ejection fraction was not significantly different between the groups. The medication doses of ARNI were lower than in clinical trials.ConclusionsIn patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, sacubitril/valsartan was superior to ARB therapy in reducing the occurrence of the primary outcome endpoint of hospitalization for worsening HF and cardiovascular death.
| S-EPMC7524065 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo assess 4 adverse renal outcomes in a heterogeneous cohort of patients with systolic heart failure (HF) who were prescribed sacubitril-valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB).Patients and methodsThe OptumLabs Database Warehouse, which contains linked administrative claims and laboratory results, was used to identify patients with systolic HF who were prescribed sacubitril-valsartan or ACEi/ARB between July 1, 2015, and September 30, 2019. One-to-one propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline variables. Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to compare renal outcomes in both medication groups, including 30% or more decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), doubling of serum creatinine, acute kidney injury (AKI), and kidney failure (eGFR < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m2, kidney transplant, or dialysis initiation).ResultsA total of 4667 matched pairs receiving sacubitril-valsartan or ACEi/ARB were included; the mean follow-up period was 7.8±7.8 months. The mean age was 69.4±11 years; 35% were female, 19% black, and 15% Hispanic. The cumulative risk at 1 year was 6% for 30% or more decline in eGFR, 2% for doubling of serum creatinine, 3% for AKI, and 2% to 3% for kidney failure. Furthermore, no significant differences in risk were observed with sacubitril-valsartan compared with ACEi/ARB for a 30% or more decline in eGFR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.10), doubling of serum creatinine (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.27); AKI (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.03), and kidney failure (HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.08).ConclusionAmong patients with systolic HF, the risk of adverse renal outcomes was similar between patients prescribed sacubitril-valsartan and those prescribed ACEi/ARB.
| S-EPMC8105557 | biostudies-literature