Dataset Information

Alectinib Together with Intracranial Therapies Improved Survival Outcomes in Untreated ALK-Positive Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Symptomatic and Synchronic Brain Metastases: A Retrospective Study.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

The performance of alectinib and crizotinib in untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and symptomatic and synchronic brain metastases is largely unknown. This retrospective study assessed the effectiveness of alectinib and crizotinib, together with intracranial therapies in a cohort of these patients.

Patients and methods

This study included 34 previously untreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients with three or fewer intracranial metastases. Of these patients, 13 received oral alectinib 600 mg twice daily, and 21 received oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily, until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or death. All intracranial metastases were treated with craniotomy, CyberKnife, or both.

Results

Median overall progression-free survival (PFS) was 32.8 months (95% CI 24.4-41.2 months) in patients treated with alectinib and 8.0 months (95% CI 7.3-8.7 months) in patients treated with crizotinib. Median PFS of brain lesions was not yet reached with alectinib (95% CI 30.1 months-not estimated) and was 8.5 months (95% CI 7.2-12.3 months) with crizotinib. Median PFS of lung lesions was 38.5 months (95% CI 27.5-49.5 months) with alectinib and 9.2 months (95% CI 7.4-11.0 months) with crizotinib. Median overall survival was not yet reached with alectinib (95% CI 31.0 months-not estimated) and 30.3 months (95% CI 27.3-37.1 months) with crizotinib.

Conclusion

Compared with crizotinib, alectinib showed superior efficacy and lower toxicity in the treatment of ALK-positive patients with NSCLC and symptomatic and synchronic brain metastases. The inclusion of intracranial therapies such as craniotomy or CyberKnife further improved the brain PFS and overall survival of these patients.

SUBMITTER: Yin Q

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8722687 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Although alectinib had demonstrated promising intracranial efficacy in several clinical trials, data were limited on its CNS activity in real-world settings.MethodsIn this retrospective study, ALK-positive NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from six hospitals in China were divided into three cohorts based on the treatment history before the administration of alectinib. ALK-TKI-naive patients were enrolled in cohort 1, cohort 2 included patients who experienced intracranial progression with or without extracranial progression after treatment with crizotinib, and cohort 3 included patients who developed progression only in CNS following treatment with other second-generation ALK-TKIs. The definition and evaluation of intracranial and extracranial lesions were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.ResultsSixty-five patients were eligible and included in our study (cohort 1: 20, cohort 2: 32, cohort 3: 13). For the overall population and patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases, similar intracranial response in CNS target lesions was observed: cohort 1: 81.8% and 80%; cohort 2: 76.5% and 86.7%; cohort 3: 42.8% and 33.3%. For patients in these three cohorts, 75% (6/8), 78.6% (11/14), and 83.3% (5/6) were reported to have significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms respectively. The number of patients who were in need of mannitol or corticosteroids decreased remarkably after the treatment of alectinib (p < 0.001), and there was also a steep fall-over in the number of patients with ECOG ≥2 points before and after the administration of alectinib (p = 0.003). All patients (8/8) diagnosed with LM ± BM experienced substantial alleviation in CNS-related symptoms. In cohort 1 and cohort 2, no significant difference in CNS-time to progression was found between patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic BM when treated with alectinib alone.ConclusionsOur study substantiated the potent CNS activity of alectinib in real-world settings. Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic BM could benefit from alectinib comparatively, which indicated that alectinib alone might defer the timing of local treatment. However, our results should be treated cautiously owing to limited sample size.