Dataset Information

Phylogenetic estimates of SARS-CoV-2 introductions into Washington State.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The first confirmed case of SARS-CoV-2 in North America was identified in Washington state on January 21, 2020. We aimed to quantify the number and temporal trends of out-of-state introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into Washington.

Methods

We conducted a molecular epidemiologic analysis of 11,422 publicly available whole genome SARS-CoV-2 sequences from GISAID sampled between December 2019 and September 2020. We used maximum parsimony ancestral state reconstruction methods on time-calibrated phylogenies to enumerate introductions/exports, their likely geographic source (US, non-US, and between eastern and western Washington), and estimated date of introduction. To incorporate phylogenetic uncertainty into our estimates, we conducted 5,000 replicate analyses by generating 25 random time-stratified samples of non-Washington reference sequences, 20 random polytomy resolutions, and 10 random resolutions of the reconstructed ancestral state.

Findings

We estimated a minimum 287 introductions (range 244-320) into Washington and 204 exported lineages (range 188-227) of SARS-CoV-2 out of Washington. Introductions began in mid-January and peaked on March 29, 2020. Lineages with the Spike D614G variant accounted for the majority (88%) of introductions. Overall, 61% (range 55-65%) of introductions into Washington likely originated from a source elsewhere within the US, while the remaining 39% (range 35-45%) likely originated from outside of the US. Intra-state transmission accounted for 65% and 28% of introductions into eastern and western Washington, respectively.

Interpretation

The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Washington was continually seeded by a large number of introductions. Our findings highlight the importance of genomic surveillance to monitor for emerging variants due to high levels of inter- and intra-state transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Funding source

None.

SUBMITTER: Tordoff DM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8733893 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus that was first reported in Wuhan, China in December of 2019 and has since caused a global pandemic resulting in millions of deaths and tens of millions of patients testing positive for infection. Analysis of different viral strains has identified a D614G change in the spike protein that is correlated with the virus becoming more transmissible. While studies have shown G614 viruses to be more transmissible, the effects of this mutation on the host response, especially on the cellular level, are yet to be fully elucidated. In this experiment we infected NHBE cells with the Washington (D614) strain or the New York (G614) strains of SARS-CoV-2. We generated RNA sequencing data at three different time points to improve our understanding of how the intracellular host response differs between infections with these two strains. We analyzed these data with a bioinformatics pipeline that identifies differentially expressed genes, enriched Gene Ontology terms and dysregulated signaling pathways. We detected over 2,000 differentially expressed genes, over 600 Gene Ontology terms, and 29 affected pathways between the two treatments. Many of these entities play a role in immune signaling and response. When comparing the different strains and different time points we found more overall similarities between matched time points than across different time points with the same strain. When specifically comparing the affected pathways, we saw that the 24hr time point of the New York strain was more similar to the 12hr time point of the Washington strain with a large number of pathways related to translation being inhibited in both strains at these time points. These results suggest that D614G substitution in the spike protein, combined with other nonsynonymous changes in the viral gene products cause distinct responses in infected host cells, especially relating to how quickly translation is dysregulated after infection. These observed differences in the intracellular host response to infection could play a role in driving the increase in pathogenicity and mortality seen in the New York outbreaks versus the Washington outbreaks at the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.