Dataset Information

Health-related attitudes, behaviors and burnout in intern medical officers and their effects on self-reported patient care in a developing country.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Intern Medical Officers (IMOs) in Sri Lanka face significant challenges due to heavy patient load and scarcity of resources.

Aims

To assess IMOs' level of burnout, associated factors and the effects on self-reported patient care in comparison to post-intern Relief House Officers (RHOs).

Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among IMOs and RHOs in two leading tertiary care hospitals in Sri Lanka. The level of burnout was assessed using Maslach Burnout Index. The self-reported health-related attitudes, practices, level of burnout, and their associations with patient care were compared between IMOs and RHOs.

Results

We studied 114 participants (70 (61.4%) IMOs and 44 (38.6%) RHOs). IMOs were not involved in regular exercises (χ²(1) = 19.8, p = 0.000), skipped meals frequently (χ²(1) = 29.3, p = 0.000), and had a poor sleep quality (χ²(1) = 35.7, p = 0.000) compared to RHOs. Overall, 46.5%, 95.5%, and 86.7% of the participants were having moderate-to-high emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and sense of poor personal achievement. The exhaustion and depersonalization levels were significantly higher among IMOs. Emotional exhaustion was significantly associated with poor sleep (U = 923.0, p = 0.014). Self-reported patient care negatively correlated with exhaustion (r_s(112) = - 0.263, p = 0.005) and depersonalization (r_s(112) = - 0.491, p = 0.000), while having positive attitudes correlated with better patient care (r_s(112) = 0.208, p = 0.027).

Conclusions

The prevalence of burnout in IMOs in Sri Lanka is high, which, in turn, negatively correlates with patient care. IMOs face significant challenges in self-care, while their poor sleep perturbs daytime activities and conceivably interferes with patient care. Therefore, we recommend introduction of preventive measures to mitigate burnout in early-career physicians, particularly IMOs, to improve both self and patient care.

SUBMITTER: Prabath IHDS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8739003 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundProblem-based curricula have provoked controversy amongst educators and students regarding outcome in medical graduates, supporting the need for longitudinal evaluation of curriculum change. As part of a longitudinal evaluation program at the University of Adelaide, a mixed method approach was used to compare the graduate outcomes of two curriculum cohorts: traditional lecture-based 'old' and problem-based 'new' learning.MethodsGraduates were asked to self-assess preparedness for hospital practice and consent to a comparative analysis of their work-place based assessments from their intern year. Comparative data were extracted from 692 work-place based assessments for 124 doctors who graduated from the University of Adelaide Medical School between 2003 and 2006.ResultsSelf-assessment: Overall, graduates of the lecture-based curriculum rated the medical program significantly higher than graduates of the problem-based curriculum. However, there was no significant difference between the two curriculum cohorts with respect to their preparedness in 13 clinical skills. There were however, two areas where the cohorts rated their preparedness in the 13 broad practitioner competencies as significantly different: problem-based graduates rated themselves as better prepared in their 'awareness of legal and ethical issues' and the lecture-based graduates rated themselves better prepared in their 'understanding of disease processes'.Work-place based assessment: There were no significant differences between the two curriculum cohorts for 'Appropriate Level of Competence' and 'Overall Appraisal'. Of the 14 work-place based assessment skills assessed for competence, no significant difference was found between the cohorts.ConclusionsThe differences in the perceived preparedness for hospital practice of two curriculum cohorts do not reflect the work-place based assessments of their competence as interns. No significant difference was found between the two cohorts in relation to their knowledge and clinical skills. However results suggest a trend in 'communication with peers and colleagues in other disciplines' (?2 (3, N?=?596) =13.10, p?=?0.056) that requires further exploration. In addition we have learned that student confidence in a new curriculum may impact on their self-perception of preparedness, while not affecting their actual competence.