Dataset Information

Identifying High-Risk Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients by Molecular Subtyping.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is considered the most aggressive type of breast cancer (BC) with limited options for therapy. TNBC is a heterogeneous disease and tumors have been classified into TNBC subtypes using gene expression profiling to distinguish basal-like 1, basal-like 2, immunomodulatory, mesenchymal, mesenchymal stem-like, luminal androgen receptor (LAR), and one nonclassifiable group (called unstable).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to verify the clinical relevance of molecular subtyping of TNBCs to improve the individual indication of systemic therapy.

Patients and methods

Molecular subtyping was performed in 124 (82%) of 152 TNBC tumors that were obtained from a prospective, multicenter cohort including 1,270 histopathologically confirmed invasive, nonmetastatic BCs (NCT01592825). Treatment was guideline-based. TNBC subtypes were correlated with recurrence-free interval (RFI) and overall survival (OS) after 5 years of observation.

Results

Using PAM50 analysis, 87% of the tumors were typed as basal with an inferior clinical outcome compared to patients with nonbasal tumors. Using the TNBCtype-6 classifier, we identified 23 (15%) of TNBCs as LAR subtype. After standard adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients with LAR subtype showed the most events for 5-year RFI (66.7 vs. 80.6%) and the poorest probability of 5-year OS (60.0 vs. 84.4%) compared to patients with non-LAR disease (RFI: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-5.05, p = 0.211; OS: aHR = 2.74, 95% CI 1.06-7.10, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

Molecular analysis and subtyping of TNBC may be relevant to identify patients with LAR subtype. These cancers seem to be less sensitive to conventional chemotherapy, and new treatment options, including androgen receptor-blocking agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have to be explored.

SUBMITTER: Hartung C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8740062 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionTriple-negative breast cancers need to be refined in order to identify therapeutic subgroups of patients.MethodsWe conducted an unsupervised analysis of microarray gene-expression profiles of 107 triple-negative breast cancer patients and undertook robust functional annotation of the molecular entities found by means of numerous approaches including immunohistochemistry and gene-expression signatures. A triple-negative external cohort (n=87) was used for validation.ResultsFuzzy clustering separated triple-negative tumours into three clusters: C1 (22.4%), C2 (44.9%) and C3 (32.7%). C1 patients were older (mean=64.6 years) than C2 (mean=56.8 years; P=0.03) and C3 patients (mean=51.9 years; P=0.0004). Histological grade and Nottingham prognostic index were higher in C2 and C3 than in C1 (P<0.0001 for both comparisons). Significant event-free survival (P=0.03) was found according to cluster membership: patients belonging to C3 had a better outcome than patients in C1 (P=0.01) and C2 (P=0.02). Event-free survival analysis results were confirmed when our cohort was pooled with the external cohort (n=194; P=0.01). Functional annotation showed that 22% of triple-negative patients were not basal-like (C1). C1 was enriched in luminal subtypes and positive androgen receptor (luminal androgen receptor). C2 could be considered as an almost pure basal-like cluster. C3, enriched in basal-like subtypes but to a lesser extent, included 26% of claudin-low subtypes. Dissection of immune response showed that high immune response and low M2-like macrophages were a hallmark of C3, and that these patients had a better event-free survival than C2 patients, characterized by low immune response and high M2-like macrophages: P=0.02 for our cohort, and P=0.03 for pooled cohorts.ConclusionsWe identified three subtypes of triple-negative patients: luminal androgen receptor (22%), basal-like with low immune response and high M2-like macrophages (45%), and basal-enriched with high immune response and low M2-like macrophages (33%). We noted out that macrophages and other immune effectors offer a variety of therapeutic targets in breast cancer, and particularly in triple-negative basal-like tumours. Furthermore, we showed that CK5 antibody was better suited than CK5/6 antibody to subtype triple-negative patients.

Project description:BackgroundMolecular subtyping of triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) via gene expression profiling is essential for understanding the molecular essence of this heterogeneous disease and for guiding individualized treatment. We aim to devise a clinically practical method based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the molecular subtyping of TNBCs.Materials and methodsBy analyzing the RNA sequencing data on TNBCs from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) (n = 360) and The Cancer Genome Atlas data set (n = 158), we determined markers that can identify specific molecular subtypes. We performed immunohistochemical staining on tumor sections of 210 TNBCs from FUSCC, established an IHC-based classifier, and applied it to another two cohorts (n = 183 and 214).ResultsWe selected androgen receptor (AR), CD8, FOXC1, and DCLK1 as immunohistochemical markers and classified TNBCs into five subtypes based on the staining results: (a) IHC-based luminal androgen receptor (IHC-LAR; AR-positive [+]), (b) IHC-based immunomodulatory (IHC-IM; AR-negative [-], CD8+), (c) IHC-based basal-like immune-suppressed (IHC-BLIS; AR-, CD8-, FOXC1+), (d) IHC-based mesenchymal (IHC-MES; AR-, CD8-, FOXC1-, DCLK1+), and (e) IHC-based unclassifiable (AR-, CD8-, FOXC1-, DCLK1-). The κ statistic indicated substantial agreement between the IHC-based classification and mRNA-based classification. Multivariate survival analysis suggested that our IHC-based classification was an independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival. Transcriptomic data and pathological observations implied potential treatment strategies for different subtypes. The IHC-LAR subtype showed relative activation of HER2 pathway. The IHC-IM subtype tended to exhibit an immune-inflamed phenotype characterized by the infiltration of CD8+ T cells into tumor parenchyma. The IHC-BLIS subtype showed high expression of a VEGF signature. The IHC-MES subtype displayed activation of JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway.ConclusionWe developed an IHC-based approach to classify TNBCs into molecular subtypes. This IHC-based classification can provide additional information for prognostic evaluation. It allows for subgrouping of TNBC patients in clinical trials and evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapies within certain subtypes.Implications for practiceAn immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based classification approach was developed for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which exhibited substantial agreement with the mRNA expression-based classification. This IHC-based classification (a) allows for subgrouping of TNBC patients in large clinical trials and evaluating the efficacy of targeted therapies within certain subtypes, (b) will contribute to the practical application of subtype-specific treatment for patients with TNBC, and (c) can provide additional information beyond traditional prognostic factors in relapse prediction.

Project description:Triple-negative (TN) breast cancers need to be refined in order to identify therapeutic subgroups of patients. We conducted an unsupervised analysis of microarray gene-expression profiles of 107 TN breast cancer patients and undertook robust functional annotation of the molecular entities found by means of numerous approaches including immunohistochemistry and gene-expression signatures. An 87 TN external cohort was used for validation. Fuzzy clustering separated TN tumours into three clusters: C1 (22.4%), C2 (44.9%) and C3 (32.7%). C1 patients were older (mean = 64.6 years) than C2 (mean = 56.8 years; P = 0.03) and C3 patients (mean = 51.9 years; P = 0.0004). Histological grade and Nottingham prognostic index were higher in C2 and C3 than in C1 (P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Significant event-free survival (EFS) (P = 0.03) was found according to cluster membership: patients belonging to C3 had a better outcome than patients in C1 (P = 0.01) and C2 (P = 0.02). EFS analysis results were confirmed when our cohort was pooled with external cohort (n = 194; P = 0.01). Functional annotation showed that 22% of TN patients were not basal-like (C1). C1 was enriched in luminal subtypes and positive androgen receptor (luminal androgen receptor [LAR]). C2 could be considered as an almost pure basal-like cluster. C3, enriched in basal-like subtypes, but to a lesser extent, included 26% of claudin-low subtypes. Dissection of immune response showed that high immune response (HIR) and low M2-like macrophages were a hallmark of C3, and that these patients had a better EFS than C2 patients, characterized by low immune response (LIR) and high M2-like macrophages: P = 0.02 for our cohort, and P = 0.03 for pooled cohorts. We identified 3 subtypes of TN patients: LAR (22%), basal-like with LIR and high M2-like macrophages (45%) and basal-enriched with HIR and low M2-like macrophages (33%). We pointed out that macrophages and other immune effectors offer a variety of therapeutic targets in breast cancer, and particularly in TN basal-like tumours. Furthermore, we showed that CK5 antibody was better suited than CK5/6 antibody to subtype TN patients. Subtyping molecular characterization within a cohort of 107 TN-IHC by means of gene expression profiling