Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

28 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Identification of causal effects in case-control studies.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Case-control designs are an important yet commonly misunderstood tool in the epidemiologist's arsenal for causal inference. We reconsider classical concepts, assumptions and principles and explore when the results of case-control studies can be endowed a causal interpretation.

Results

We establish how, and under which conditions, various causal estimands relating to intention-to-treat or per-protocol effects can be identified based on the data that are collected under popular sampling schemes (case-base, survivor, and risk-set sampling, with or without matching). We present a concise summary of our identification results that link the estimands to the (distribution of the) available data and articulate under which conditions these links hold.

Conclusion

The modern epidemiologist's arsenal for causal inference is well-suited to make transparent for case-control designs what assumptions are necessary or sufficient to endow the respective study results with a causal interpretation and, in turn, help resolve or prevent misunderstanding. Our approach may inform future research on different estimands, other variations of the case-control design or settings with additional complexities.

SUBMITTER: L Penning de Vries BB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8742362 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

A weighting approach to causal effects and additive interaction in case-control studies: marginal structural linear odds models.

Project description:Estimates of additive interaction from case-control data are often obtained by logistic regression; such models can also be used to adjust for covariates. This approach to estimating additive interaction has come under some criticism because of possible misspecification of the logistic model: If the underlying model is linear, the logistic model will be misspecified. The authors propose an inverse probability of treatment weighting approach to causal effects and additive interaction in case-control studies. Under the assumption of no unmeasured confounding, the approach amounts to fitting a marginal structural linear odds model. The approach allows for the estimation of measures of additive interaction between dichotomous exposures, such as the relative excess risk due to interaction, using case-control data without having to rely on modeling assumptions for the outcome conditional on the exposures and covariates. Rather than using conditional models for the outcome, models are instead specified for the exposures conditional on the covariates. The approach is illustrated by assessing additive interaction between genetic and environmental factors using data from a case-control study.

| S-EPMC3246690 | biostudies-literature

Designs combining instrumental variables with case-control: estimating principal strata causal effects.

Project description:The instrumental variables framework is commonly used for the estimation of causal effects from cohort samples. However, the combination of instrumental variables with more efficient designs such as case-control sampling requires new methodological consideration. For example, as the use of Mendelian randomization studies is increasing and the cost of genotyping and gene expression data can be high, the analysis of data gathered from more cost-effective sampling designs is of prime interest. We show that the standard instrumental variables analysis does not appropriately estimate the causal effects of interest when the instrumental variables design is combined with the case-control design. We also propose a method that can estimate the causal effects in such combined designs. We illustrate the method with a study in oncology.

| S-EPMC3608098 | biostudies-literature

Correcting for batch effects in case-control microbiome studies.

Project description:High-throughput data generation platforms, like mass-spectrometry, microarrays, and second-generation sequencing are susceptible to batch effects due to run-to-run variation in reagents, equipment, protocols, or personnel. Currently, batch correction methods are not commonly applied to microbiome sequencing datasets. In this paper, we compare different batch-correction methods applied to microbiome case-control studies. We introduce a model-free normalization procedure where features (i.e. bacterial taxa) in case samples are converted to percentiles of the equivalent features in control samples within a study prior to pooling data across studies. We look at how this percentile-normalization method compares to traditional meta-analysis methods for combining independent p-values and to limma and ComBat, widely used batch-correction models developed for RNA microarray data. Overall, we show that percentile-normalization is a simple, non-parametric approach for correcting batch effects and improving sensitivity in case-control meta-analyses.

| S-EPMC5940237 | biostudies-literature

Witnesses of causal nonseparability: an introduction and a few case studies.

Project description:It was recently realised that quantum theory allows for so-called causally nonseparable processes, which are incompatible with any definite causal order. This was first suggested on a rather abstract level by the formalism of process matrices, an extension of the quantum formalism which only assumes that quantum theory holds locally in some observers' laboratories, but does not impose a global causal structure; it was then shown, on a more practical level, that the quantum switch-a new, already implementable resource for quantum computation that goes beyond causally ordered circuits-provided precisely a physical example of a causally nonseparable process. To demonstrate that a given process is causally nonseparable, the concept of witnesses of causal nonseparability was introduced. Here we present a shorter introduction to this concept, and concentrate on some explicit examples-by considering in particular different noise models for the quantum switch-to show how to construct and use such witnesses in practice.

| S-EPMC4870702 | biostudies-other

Causal Inference with Case-Only Studies in Injury Epidemiology Research.

Project description:Purpose of reviewWe review the application and limitations of two implementations of the "case-only design" in injury epidemiology with example analyses of Fatality Analysis Reporting System data.Recent findingsThe term "case-only design" covers a variety of epidemiologic designs; here, two implementations of the design are reviewed: (1) studies to uncover etiological heterogeneity and (2) studies to measure exposure effect modification. These two designs produce results that require different interpretations and rely upon different assumptions. The key assumption of case-only designs for exposure effect modification, the more commonly used of the two designs, does not commonly hold for injuries and so results from studies using this design cannot be interpreted. Case-only designs to identify etiological heterogeneity in injury risk are interpretable but only when the case-series is conceptualized as arising from an underlying cohort.SummaryThe results of studies using case-only designs are commonly misinterpreted in the injury literature.

| S-EPMC10161782 | biostudies-literature

Experimental designs for robust detection of effects in genome-wide case-control studies.

Project description:In genome-wide association studies hundreds of thousands of loci are scanned in thousands of cases and controls, with the goal of identifying genomic loci underpinning disease. This is a challenging statistical problem requiring strong evidence. Only a small proportion of the heritability of common diseases has so far been explained. This "dark matter of the genome" is a subject of much discussion. It is critical to have experimental design criteria that ensure that associations between genomic loci and phenotypes are robustly detected. To ensure associations are robustly detected we require good power (e.g., 0.8) and sufficiently strong evidence [i.e., a high Bayes factor (e.g., 10(6), meaning the data are 1 million times more likely if the association is real than if there is no association)] to overcome the low prior odds for any given marker in a genome scan to be associated with a causal locus. Power calculations are given for determining the sample sizes necessary to detect effects with the required power and Bayes factor for biallelic markers in linkage disequilibrium with causal loci in additive, dominant, and recessive genetic models. Significantly stronger evidence and larger sample sizes are required than indicated by traditional hypothesis tests and power calculations. Many reported putative effects are not robustly detected and many effects including some large moderately low-frequency effects may remain undetected. These results may explain the dark matter in the genome. The power calculations have been implemented in R and will be available in the R package ldDesign.

| S-EPMC3241427 | biostudies-literature

Identification of Personalized Effects Associated With Causal Pathways.

Project description:Unlike classical causal inference, where the goal is to estimate average causal effects within a population, in settings such as personalized medicine, the goal is to map a unit's characteristics to a treatment tailored to maximize the expected outcome for that unit. Obtaining high-quality mappings of this type is the goal of the dynamic treatment regime literature. In healthcare settings, optimizing policies with respect to a particular causal pathway is often of interest as well. In the context of average treatment effects, estimation of effects associated with causal pathways is considered in the mediation analysis literature. In this paper, we combine mediation analysis and dynamic treatment regime ideas and consider how unit characteristics may be used to tailor a treatment strategy that maximizes an effect along specified sets of causal pathways. In particular, we define counterfactual responses to such policies, give a general identification algorithm for these counterfactuals, and prove completeness of the algorithm for unrestricted policies. A corollary of our results is that the identification algorithm for responses to policies given in [16] is complete for arbitrary policies.

| S-EPMC6764091 | biostudies-literature

A Bayesian Partitioning Model for the Detection of Multilocus Effects in Case-Control Studies.

Project description:Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified hundreds of genetic variants associated with complex diseases, but these variants appear to explain very little of the disease heritability. The typical single-locus association analysis in a GWAS fails to detect variants with small effect sizes and to capture higher-order interaction among these variants. Multilocus association analysis provides a powerful alternative by jointly modeling the variants within a gene or a pathway and by reducing the burden of multiple hypothesis testing in a GWAS.Here, we propose a powerful and flexible dimension reduction approach to model multilocus association. We use a Bayesian partitioning model which clusters SNPs according to their direction of association, models higher-order interactions using a flexible scoring scheme and uses posterior marginal probabilities to detect association between the SNP set and the disease.We illustrate our method using extensive simulation studies and applying it to detect multilocus interaction in Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) GWAS with type 2 diabetes.We demonstrate that our approach has better power to detect multilocus interactions than several existing approaches. When applied to the ARIC study dataset with 9,328 individuals to study gene-based associations for type 2 diabetes, our method identified some novel variants not detected by conventional single-locus association analyses.

| S-EPMC4499013 | biostudies-literature

Efficient estimation of indirect effects in case-control studies using a unified likelihood framework.

Project description:Mediation models are a set of statistical techniques that investigate the mechanisms that produce an observed relationship between an exposure variable and an outcome variable in order to deduce the extent to which the relationship is influenced by intermediate mediator variables. For a case-control study, the most common mediation analysis strategy employs a counterfactual framework that permits estimation of indirect and direct effects on the odds ratio scale for dichotomous outcomes, assuming either binary or continuous mediators. While this framework has become an important tool for mediation analysis, we demonstrate that we can embed this approach in a unified likelihood framework for mediation analysis in case-control studies that leverages more features of the data (in particular, the relationship between exposure and mediator) to improve efficiency of indirect effect estimates. One important feature of our likelihood approach is that it naturally incorporates cases within the exposure-mediator model to improve efficiency. Our approach does not require knowledge of disease prevalence and can model confounders and exposure-mediator interactions, and is straightforward to implement in standard statistical software. We illustrate our approach using both simulated data and real data from a case-control genetic study of lung cancer.

| S-EPMC9232910 | biostudies-literature

Estimation of causal effects of binary treatments in unconfounded studies.

Project description:Estimation of causal effects in non-randomized studies comprises two distinct phases: design, without outcome data, and analysis of the outcome data according to a specified protocol. Recently, Gutman and Rubin (2013) proposed a new analysis-phase method for estimating treatment effects when the outcome is binary and there is only one covariate, which viewed causal effect estimation explicitly as a missing data problem. Here, we extend this method to situations with continuous outcomes and multiple covariates and compare it with other commonly used methods (such as matching, subclassification, weighting, and covariance adjustment). We show, using an extensive simulation, that of all methods considered, and in many of the experimental conditions examined, our new 'multiple-imputation using two subclassification splines' method appears to be the most efficient and has coverage levels that are closest to nominal. In addition, it can estimate finite population average causal effects as well as non-linear causal estimands. This type of analysis also allows the identification of subgroups of units for which the effect appears to be especially beneficial or harmful.

| S-EPMC4782596 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data