Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

34 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Stacked survival models for residual lifetime data.

ABSTRACT: When modelling the survival distribution of a disease for which the symptomatic progression of the associated condition is insidious, it is not always clear how to measure the failure/censoring times from some true date of disease onset. In a prevalent cohort study with follow-up, one approach for removing any potential influence from the uncertainty in the measurement of the true onset dates is through the utilization of only the residual lifetimes. As the residual lifetimes are measured from a well-defined screening date (prevalence day) to failure/censoring, these observed time durations are essentially error free. Using residual lifetime data, the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) may be used to estimate the underlying survival function. However, the resulting estimator can yield exceptionally wide confidence intervals. Alternatively, while parametric maximum likelihood estimation can yield narrower confidence intervals, it may not be robust to model misspecification. Using only right-censored residual lifetime data, we propose a stacking procedure to overcome the non-robustness of model misspecification; our proposed estimator comprises a linear combination of individual nonparametric/parametric survival function estimators, with optimal stacking weights obtained by minimizing a Brier Score loss function.

SUBMITTER: McVittie JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8742399 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Combining parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric survival models with stacked survival models.

Project description:For estimating conditional survival functions, non-parametric estimators can be preferred to parametric and semi-parametric estimators due to relaxed assumptions that enable robust estimation. Yet, even when misspecified, parametric and semi-parametric estimators can possess better operating characteristics in small sample sizes due to smaller variance than non-parametric estimators. Fundamentally, this is a bias-variance trade-off situation in that the sample size is not large enough to take advantage of the low bias of non-parametric estimation. Stacked survival models estimate an optimally weighted combination of models that can span parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric models by minimizing prediction error. An extensive simulation study demonstrates that stacked survival models consistently perform well across a wide range of scenarios by adaptively balancing the strengths and weaknesses of individual candidate survival models. In addition, stacked survival models perform as well as or better than the model selected through cross-validation. Finally, stacked survival models are applied to a well-known German breast cancer study.

| S-EPMC5963472 | biostudies-literature

Estimating restricted mean treatment effects with stacked survival models.

Project description:The difference in restricted mean survival times between two groups is a clinically relevant summary measure. With observational data, there may be imbalances in confounding variables between the two groups. One approach to account for such imbalances is estimating a covariate-adjusted restricted mean difference by modeling the covariate-adjusted survival distribution and then marginalizing over the covariate distribution. Because the estimator for the restricted mean difference is defined by the estimator for the covariate-adjusted survival distribution, it is natural to expect that a better estimator of the covariate-adjusted survival distribution is associated with a better estimator of the restricted mean difference. We therefore propose estimating restricted mean differences with stacked survival models. Stacked survival models estimate a weighted average of several survival models by minimizing predicted error. By including a range of parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric models, stacked survival models can robustly estimate a covariate-adjusted survival distribution and, therefore, the restricted mean treatment effect in a wide range of scenarios. We demonstrate through a simulation study that better performance of the covariate-adjusted survival distribution often leads to better mean squared error of the restricted mean difference although there are notable exceptions. In addition, we demonstrate that the proposed estimator can perform nearly as well as Cox regression when the proportional hazards assumption is satisfied and significantly better when proportional hazards is violated. Finally, the proposed estimator is illustrated with data from the United Network for Organ Sharing to evaluate post-lung transplant survival between large-volume and small-volume centers. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

| S-EPMC4938776 | biostudies-literature

PSEUDO-VALUE APPROACH FOR CONDITIONAL QUANTILE RESIDUAL LIFETIME ANALYSIS FOR CLUSTERED SURVIVAL AND COMPETING RISKS DATA WITH APPLICATIONS TO BONE MARROW TRANSPLANT DATA.

Project description:Quantile residual lifetime analysis is conducted to compare remaining lifetimes among groups for survival data. Evaluating residual lifetimes among groups after adjustment for covariates is often of interest. The current literature is limited to comparing two groups for independent data. We propose a pseudo-value approach to compare quantile residual lifetimes given covariates between multiple groups for independent and clustered survival data. The proposed method considers clustered event times and clustered censoring times in addition to independent event times and censoring times. We show that the method can also be used to compare multiple groups on the cause specific residual life distribution in the competing risk setting, for which there are no current methods which account for clustering. The empirical Type I errors and statistical power of the proposed study are examined in a simulation study, which shows that the proposed method controls Type I errors very well and has higher power than an existing method. The proposed method is illustrated by a bone marrow transplant data set.

| S-EPMC5656291 | biostudies-literature

Estimating the loss of lifetime function using flexible parametric relative survival models.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Within cancer care, dynamic evaluations of the loss in expectation of life provides useful information to patients as well as physicians. The loss of lifetime function yields the conditional loss in expectation of life given survival up to a specific time point. Due to the inevitable censoring in time-to-event data, loss of lifetime estimation requires extrapolation of both the patient and general population survival function. In this context, the accuracy of different extrapolation approaches has not previously been evaluated. METHODS:The loss of lifetime function was computed by decomposing the all-cause survival function using the relative and general population survival function. To allow extrapolation, the relative survival function was fitted using existing parametric relative survival models. In addition, we introduced a novel mixture cure model suitable for extrapolation. The accuracy of the estimated loss of lifetime function using various extrapolation approaches was assessed in a simulation study and by data from the Danish Cancer Registry where complete follow-up was available. In addition, we illustrated the proposed methodology by analyzing recent data from the Danish Lymphoma Registry. RESULTS:No uniformly superior extrapolation method was found, but flexible parametric mixture cure models and flexible parametric relative survival models seemed to be suitable in various scenarios. CONCLUSION:Using extrapolation to estimate the loss of lifetime function requires careful consideration of the relative survival function outside the available follow-up period. We propose extensive sensitivity analyses when estimating the loss of lifetime function.

| S-EPMC6350283 | biostudies-literature

Residual plots for linear regression models with censored outcome data: A refined method for visualizing residual uncertainty.

Project description:Residual plots are a standard tool for assessing model fit. When some outcome data are censored, standard residual plots become less appropriate. Here, we develop a new procedure for producing residual plots for linear regression models where some or all of the outcome data are censored. We implement two approaches for incorporating parameter uncertainty. We illustrate our methodology by examining the model fit for an analysis of bacterial load data from a trial for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Simulated datasets show that the method can be used when the outcome data consist of a variety of types of censoring.

| S-EPMC7614636 | biostudies-literature

Flexible and Interpretable Models for Survival Data.

Project description:As datasets continue to increase in size, there is growing interest in methods for prediction that are both Received January 2018 flexible and interpretable. A flurry of recent work on this topic has focused on additive modeling in the Revised February 2019 regression setting, and in particular, on the use of data-adaptive nonlinear functions that can be used to flexibly model each covariate's effect, conditional on the other features in the model. In this article, we extend this recent line of work to the survival setting. We develop an additive Cox proportional hazards model, in which each additive function is obtained by trend filtering, so that the fitted functions are piece-wise polynomial with adaptively chosen knots. An efficient proximal gradient descent algorithm is used to fit the model. We demonstrate its performance in simulations and in application to a primary biliary cirrhosis data set, as well as a dataset consisting of time to publication for clinical trials in the biomedical literature. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

| S-EPMC7377334 | biostudies-literature

Association between modifiable lifestyle factors and residual lifetime risk of diabetes.

Project description:While clinical trials have reported beneficial effects of diet, exercise, and weight loss on incident diabetes in subjects with obesity or impaired glucose tolerance, little is known about the incremental benefit of not smoking and moderate drinking on diabetes risk. We sought to examine the association between modifiable lifestyle factors and residual lifetime risk of diabetes.Prospective cohorts involving 20,915 men (1982-2008) and 36,594 women (1992-2008). Modifiable lifestyle factors and adiposity were ascertained at baseline in each cohort and incident diabetes was ascertained during follow up. The mean age at baseline was 53.5 y in men and 54.6 y in women. During an average follow up of 22.6 y in men and 13.0 y in women, 2096 men and 2390 women developed diabetes. At age 45 y, the residual lifetime risk of diabetes (95% CI) for men with 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 + healthy lifestyle factors was 30.5 (27.3-33.7); 21.5 (19.9-23.0); 15.1 (13.9-16.3); 10.3 (9.1-11.5); and 7.3 (5.7-8.9) percent; respectively. Corresponding values for women were 31.4 (28.3-34.5); 24.1 (21.8-26.5); 14.2 (12.7-15.7); 11.6 (9.7-13.5); and 6.4 (4.2-8.6) percent, respectively.These data show an inverse and graded relation between desirable lifestyle factors and residual lifetime risk of diabetes in men and women. Not smoking and moderate drinking may have additional benefits when added to exercise, weight control, and diet.

| S-EPMC3274624 | biostudies-literature

Exploring the Impact of Missing Data on Residual-Based Dimensionality Analysis for Measurement Models.

Project description:Researchers frequently use Rasch models to analyze survey responses because these models provide accurate parameter estimates for items and examinees when there are missing data. However, researchers have not fully considered how missing data affect the accuracy of dimensionality assessment in Rasch analyses such as principal components analysis (PCA) of standardized residuals. Because adherence to unidimensionality is a prerequisite for the appropriate interpretation and use of Rasch model results, insight into the impact of missing data on the accuracy of this approach is critical. We used a simulation study to examine the accuracy of standardized residual PCA with various proportions of missing data and multidimensionality. We also explored an adaptation of modified parallel analysis in combination with standardized residual PCA as a source of additional information about dimensionality when missing data are present. Our results suggested that missing data impact the accuracy of PCA on standardized residuals, and that the adaptation of modified parallel analysis provides useful supplementary information about dimensionality when there are missing data.

| S-EPMC10621687 | biostudies-literature

Learning Individual Survival Models from PanCancer Whole Transcriptome Data.

Project description:PurposePersonalized medicine attempts to predict survival time for each patient, based on their individual tumor molecular profile. We investigate whether our survival learner in combination with a dimension reduction method can produce useful survival estimates for a variety of patients with cancer.Experimental designThis article provides a method that learns a model for predicting the survival time for individual patients with cancer from the PanCancer Atlas: given the (16,335 dimensional) gene expression profiles from 10,173 patients, each having one of 33 cancers, this method uses unsupervised nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) to reexpress the gene expression data for each patient in terms of 100 learned NMF factors. It then feeds these 100 factors into the Multi-Task Logistic Regression (MTLR) learner to produce cancer-specific models for each of 20 cancers (with >50 uncensored instances); this produces "individual survival distributions" (ISD), which provide survival probabilities at each future time for each individual patient, which provides a patient's risk score and estimated survival time.ResultsOur NMF-MTLR concordance indices outperformed the VAECox benchmark by 14.9% overall. We achieved optimal survival prediction using pan-cancer NMF in combination with cancer-specific MTLR models. We provide biological interpretation of the NMF model and clinical implications of ISDs for prognosis and therapeutic response prediction.ConclusionsNMF-MTLR provides many benefits over other models: superior model discrimination, superior calibration, meaningful survival time estimates, and accurate probabilistic estimates of survival over time for each individual patient. We advocate for the adoption of these cancer survival models in clinical and research settings.

| S-EPMC10543961 | biostudies-literature

Cox Regression Models with Functional Covariates for Survival Data.

Project description:We extend the Cox proportional hazards model to cases when the exposure is a densely sampled functional process, measured at baseline. The fundamental idea is to combine penalized signal regression with methods developed for mixed effects proportional hazards models. The model is fit by maximizing the penalized partial likelihood, with smoothing parameters estimated by a likelihood-based criterion such as AIC or EPIC. The model may be extended to allow for multiple functional predictors, time varying coefficients, and missing or unequally-spaced data. Methods were inspired by and applied to a study of the association between time to death after hospital discharge and daily measures of disease severity collected in the intensive care unit, among survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

| S-EPMC4591554 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data