Unknown

Dataset Information

0

The changing landscape of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): fundamentals and controversies.


ABSTRACT: The increase in the number of therapeutic alternatives for both newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients has widened the clinical scenario, leading to a level of complexity that no algorithm has been able to cover up to date. At present, this complexity increases due to the wide variety of clinical situations found in MM patients before they reach the status of relapsed/refractory disease. These different backgrounds may include primary refractoriness, early relapse after completion of first-line therapy with latest-generation agents, or very late relapse after chemotherapy or autologous transplantation. It is also important to bear in mind that many patient profiles are not fully represented in the main randomized clinical trials (RCT), and this further complicates treatment decision-making. In RRMM patients, the choice of previously unused drugs and the number and duration of previous therapeutic regimens until progression has a greater impact on treatment efficacy than the adverse biological characteristics of MM itself. In addition to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies and corticosteroids, a new generation of drugs such as XPO inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, new alkylators and, above all, immunotherapy based on conjugated anti-BCMA antibodies and CAR-T cells, have been developed to fight RRMM. This comprehensive review addresses the fundamentals and controversies regarding RRMM, and discusses the main aspects of management and treatment. The basis for the clinical management of RRMM (complexity of clinical scenarios, key factors to consider before choosing an appropriate treatment, or when to treat), the arsenal of new drugs with no cross resistance with previously administered standard first line regimens (main phase 3 clinical trials), the future outlook including the usefulness of abandoned resources, together with the controversies surrounding the clinical management of RRMM patients will be reviewed in detail.

SUBMITTER: Hernandez-Rivas JA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8743063 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7285937 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8361732 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7386890 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7862055 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8191071 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5380907 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3430086 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4163602 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6754719 | biostudies-literature