Dataset Information

Percutaneous extraction of a large device-related thrombus on a Watchman™ device: a case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Left atrial appendage occlusion devices are commonly used to prevent stroke in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are unable to tolerate anticoagulation. However, certain patient- and device-related characteristics increase the risk for the development of a device-related thrombus (DRT). The presence of a DRT increases the risk of stroke and should be treated. Management of DRT lacks consensus but is mostly focused on anticoagulation. In patients with large thrombi that need to be managed urgently, percutaneous extraction may be a viable option.

Case summary

In this report, we describe the successful management of a DRT via percutaneous thrombus extraction technology in an 81-year-old woman with a large thrombus attached to a WATCHMAN™ device. The patient initially presented with shortness of breath, and on imaging a pedunculated thrombus was detected. The thrombus was extracted using a Penumbra Lightning 12™ (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) catheter with a Sentinel™ (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) cerebral embolic protection device. The patient had no neurologic sequelae and was started on anticoagulation.

Discussion

Percutaneous thrombectomy can be safely performed to extract large left atrial occlusion DRT that require urgent management, without any neurologic sequelae. We believe this can be used in patients with a large DRT who would not be adequately managed with anticoagulation and in whom surgery is not feasible.

SUBMITTER: Vyas R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8759468 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is an alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation to reduce stroke risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The Amplatzer™ Amulet™ LAA Occluder IDE Trial (Amulet IDE Trial) was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the dual-seal mechanism of the Amulet LAA occluder compared with the Watchman™ device. Methods: Patients with NVAF at increased risk of stroke were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo percutaneous implantation of a LAA occluder with the Amulet occluder or Watchman device. The primary endpoints included safety (composite of procedure-related complications, all-cause death, or major bleeding at 12 months) and effectiveness (composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism at 18 months) and the rate of LAA occlusion at 45 days. Pre-specified secondary endpoints included a composite of all stroke, systemic embolism, or cardiovascular/unexplained death at 18 months, major bleeding at 18 months, and superiority test of the three primary endpoints. Results: A total of 1878 patients were enrolled. The Amulet occluder was noninferior to the Watchman device for the primary safety endpoint (14.5% vs. 14.7%; difference=-0.14, 95% CI, -3.42-3.13; p<0.001 for noninferiority). Major bleeding and all-cause death were similar between groups (10.6% vs 10.0% and 3.9% vs 5.1%, respectively). Procedure-related complications were higher for the Amulet occluder (4.5% vs. 2.5%), largely related to more frequent pericardial effusion and device embolization. The Amulet occluder was noninferior to the Watchman device for the primary effectiveness endpoint (2.8% vs. 2.8%; difference=0.00, 95% CI, -1.55-1.55; p<0.001 for non-inferiority), and the composite of stroke, systemic embolism or cardiovascular/unexplained death (5.6% vs 7.7%, difference=-2.12, 95% CI, -4.45-0.21; p<0.001 for noninferiority). The rate of major bleeding was similar between groups (11.6% vs. 12.3%; difference=-0.71, 95% CI -3.72-2.31; p=0.32 for superiority). LAA occlusion was higher for the Amulet occluder compared with the Watchman device (98.9% vs. 96.8%; difference=2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-3.66; p<0.001 for noninferiority; p=0.003 for superiority). Conclusions: The Amulet occluder was non-inferior for safety and effectiveness of stroke prevention for NVAF compared with the Watchman device, and superior for LAA occlusion. Procedure-related complications were higher with the Amulet device and decreased with operator experience. Clinical Trial Registration: URL https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier NCT02879448.