Dataset Information

Evaluation of Three Automated Extraction Systems for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Clinical Respiratory Specimens.

ABSTRACT: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is highly contagious and causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is the most accurate and reliable molecular assay to detect active SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, a rapid increase in test subjects has created a global bottleneck in testing capacity. Given that efficient nucleic acid extraction greatly affects reliable and accurate testing results, we compared three extraction platforms: MagNA Pure 96 DNA and Viral NA Small Volume kit on MagNA Pure 96 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), careGENE^TM Viral/Pathogen HiFi Nucleic Acid Isolation kit (WELLS BIO Inc., Seoul, Korea) on KingFisher Flex (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rocklin, CA, USA), and SGRespi^TM Pure kit (Seegene Inc., Seoul, Korea) on Maelstrom 9600 (Taiwan Advanced Nanotech Inc., Taoyuan, Taiwan). RNA was extracted from 245 residual respiratory specimens from the different types of samples (i.e., NPS, sputum, and saliva) using three different kits. The 95% limits of detection of median tissue culture infectious dose per milliliter (TCID₅₀/mL) for the MagNA Pure 96, KingFisher Flex, and Maelstrom 9600 were 0.37-3.15 × 10¹, 0.41-3.62 × 10¹, and 0.33-1.98 × 10¹, respectively. The KingFisher Flex platform exhibited 99.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas Maelstrom 9600 exhibited 98.3-100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a 95.2% concordance between MagNA Pure 96 and KingFisher Flex and 95.4% concordance between MagNA Pure 96 and Maelstrom 9600, indicating that all three platforms provided statistically reliable results. This suggests that two modifying platforms, KingFisher Flex and Maelstrom 9600, are accurate and scalable extraction platforms for large-scale SARS-CoV-2 clinical detection and could help the management of COVID-19 patients.

SUBMITTER: Lim HJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8777774 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Pooled testing combined with molecular diagnostics for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 is a promising method that can increase testing capacities and save costs. However, pooled testing is also associated with the risks of decreased test sensitivity and specificity. To perform reliable pooled testing, we developed and validated three automated media pooling and molecular diagnostic systems. These pooling systems (geneLEAD-PS, Panther-PS, and Biomek-PS) comprised existing automated molecular detection platforms, corresponding automated media pooling devices, and laboratory information management systems. Analytical sensitivity analysis and mock sample evaluation were performed, and the obtained data were used to determine the sizes of the pool for the validation study. In the validation study, a total of 2,448, 3,228, and 6,420 upper respiratory samples were used for geneLEAD-PS, Panther-PS, and Biomek-PS, respectively, and the diagnostic performances were compared with the reference RT‒PCR assay. A pool size of 6 for geneLEAD-PS and a pool size of 4 for Panther-PS and Biomek-PS were selected for the validation studies. All three systems showed high positive percent agreement values of ≥90.5% and negative percent agreement values of ≥99.8% for any specimen type. Pooled testing resulted in a 65%-71% reduction in cost per sample. The testing capacities of geneLEAD-PS, Panther-PS, and Biomek-PS were 144 samples in 3 hours, 384 samples in 5.5 hours, and 376 samples in 4 hours, respectively. The developed pooling systems showed robust diagnostic performances and will increase the testing capacities of molecular diagnostic tests while saving costs and may contribute to infection control of COVID-19.IMPORTANCEDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been surges in demand for accurate molecular diagnostic testing and laboratory supply shortages. Pooled testing combined with highly sensitive molecular testing, which entails mixing multiple samples as a single sample, is a promising approach to increase testing capacities while reducing the use of consumables. However, pooled testing is associated with risks that compromise diagnostic performance, such as false negatives due to dilution of positive samples or false positives due to cross-contamination. To perform reliable pooled testing, three different pooling systems (an automated pooling device, an automated molecular detection platform, and a laboratory information management system) were developed to accurately interpret pooled testing results. These three systems were validated using multiple clinical samples and showed high concordance with individual testing. The developed pooling systems will contribute to increasing reliable molecular testing capacities while using fewer consumables and saving costs.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of Three Automated Extraction Systems for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Clinical Respiratory Specimens.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets