Dataset Information

Patient-Level DNA Damage Repair Pathway Profiles and Anti-Tumor Immunity for Gastric Cancer.

ABSTRACT: DNA damage repair (DDR) comprises the detection and correction of alterations in the chemical structure of DNA. The dysfunction of the DDR process has been determined to have important implications for tumor carcinogenesis, malignancy progression, treatment resistance, and prognosis assessment. However, the role of the DDR process in gastric cancer (GC) remains to be fully understood. Thus, a total of 2,019 GC samples from our hospital (Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital in china) and 12 public data sets were included in our study. In this study, single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) was used to generate the DDR pathway activity profiles of 8 DDR sub-pathways and identify a DDR pathway signature by combining the DDR sub-pathway gene sets. The DDR pathway profiling's impacts on the clinical outcomes, biological functions, genetic variants, immune heterogeneity, and treatment responses were analyzed through multidimensional genomics and clinical data. The results demonstrate that the DDR pathway profiling was clearly distinguished between tumor and normal tissues. The DDR pathway profiling reveals patient-level variations, which may contribute to explaining the high heterogeneity of human GC for the biological features and treatment outcomes. Thus, tumors with low DDR signature scores were independently correlated with shorter overall survival time and significantly associated with mesenchymal, invasion, and metastasis phenotypes. The statistical model integrating this DDR pathway signature with other clinical predictors outperforms each predictor alone for predicting overall survival in discrimination, calibration, and net clinical benefit. Moreover, low DDR signature scores were tightly associated with genome stability, characterized by low tumor mutational burden (TMB) and low fractions of genome alteration. Furthermore, this study confirms that patients with low DDR pathway signature scores might not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and a monoclonal antibody directed against programmed cell death-1 ligand 1 (anti-PD1) therapy. These findings highlighted that the DDR pathway profiling confers important implications for patients with GC and provides insights into the specific clinical and molecular features underlying the DDR process, which may help to facilitate clinical management.

SUBMITTER: Lou S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8785952 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceA substantial number of patients diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer are at risk for metastatic progression after primary treatment. Better biomarkers are needed to identify patients at the highest risk to guide therapy intensification.ObjectiveTo create a DNA damage and repair (DDR) pathway profiling method for use as a prognostic signature biomarker in high-risk prostate cancer.Design, setting, and participantsA cohort of 1090 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy and were treated at 3 different academic institutions were divided into a training cohort (n = 545) and 3 pooled validation cohorts (n = 232, 130, and 183) assembled for case-control or case-cohort studies. Profiling of 9 DDR pathways using 17 gene sets for GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) of high-density microarray gene expression data from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prostatectomy samples with median 10.3 years follow-up was performed. Prognostic signature development from DDR pathway profiles was studied, and DDR pathway gene mutation in published cohorts was analyzed.Main outcomes and measuresBiochemical recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival.ResultsAcross the training cohort and pooled validation cohorts, 1090 men were studied; mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 65.3 (6.4) years. We found that there are distinct clusters of DDR pathways within the cohort, and DDR pathway enrichment is only weakly correlated with clinical variables such as age (Spearman ρ [ρ], range, -0.07 to 0.24), Gleason score (ρ, range, 0.03 to 0.20), prostate-specific antigen level (ρ, range, -0.07 to 0.10), while 13 of 17 DDR gene sets are strongly correlated with androgen receptor pathway enrichment (ρ, range, 0.33 to 0.82). In published cohorts, DDR pathway genes are rarely mutated. A DDR pathway profile prognostic signature built in the training cohort was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence-free, metastasis-free, and overall survival in the pooled validation cohorts independent of standard clinicopathological variables. The prognostic performance of the signature for metastasis-free survival appears to be stronger in the younger patients (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.12-2.50) than in the older patients (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.29-2.07) on multivariate Cox analysis.Conclusions and relevanceDNA damage and repair pathway profiling revealed patient-level variations and the DDR pathways are rarely affected by mutation. A DDR pathway signature showed strong prognostic performance with the long-term outcomes of metastasis-free and overall survival that may be useful for risk stratification of high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Project description:BackgroundTumor regression following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), marked by inflammation in non-cancerous tissues. This study was undertaken to investigate the functional relationship between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity, to facilitate irAE management while promoting anti-tumor immunity.MethodsMultiple biopsies from tumor and inflamed tissues were collected from a patient with melanoma experiencing both tumor regression and irAEs on ICB, who underwent rapid autopsy. Immune cells infiltrating melanoma lesions and inflamed normal tissues were subjected to gene expression profiling with multiplex qRT-PCR for 122 candidate genes. Subsequently, immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess the expression of 14 candidate markers of immune cell subsets and checkpoints. TCR-beta sequencing was used to explore T cell clonal repertoires across specimens.ResultsWhile genes involved in MHC I/II antigen presentation, IFN signaling, innate immunity and immunosuppression were abundantly expressed across specimens, irAE tissues over-expressed certain genes associated with immunosuppression (CSF1R, IL10RA, IL27/EBI3, FOXP3, KLRG1, SOCS1, TGFB1), including those in the COX-2/PGE2 pathway (IL1B, PTGER1/EP1 and PTGER4/EP4). Immunohistochemistry revealed similar proportions of immunosuppressive cell subsets and checkpoint molecules across samples. TCRseq did not indicate common TCR repertoires across tumor and inflammation sites, arguing against shared antigen recognition between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity in this patient.ConclusionsThis comprehensive study of a single patient with melanoma experiencing both tumor regression and irAEs on ICB explores the immune landscape across these tissues, revealing similarities between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity. Further, it highlights expression of the COX-2/PGE2 pathway, which is known to be immunosuppressive and potentially mediates ICB resistance. Ongoing clinical trials of COX-2/PGE2 pathway inhibitors targeting the major COX-2 inducer IL-1B, COX-2 itself, or the PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4 present new opportunities to promote anti-tumor activity, but may also have the potential to enhance the severity of ICB-induced irAEs.

Dataset Information

Patient-Level DNA Damage Repair Pathway Profiles and Anti-Tumor Immunity for Gastric Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets