Dataset Information

Quantitative ultrasound, elastography, and machine learning for assessment of steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in chronic liver disease.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To develop a quantitative ultrasound (QUS)- and elastography-based model to improve classification of steatosis grade, inflammation grade, and fibrosis stage in patients with chronic liver disease in comparison with shear wave elastography alone, using histopathology as the reference standard.

Methods

This ancillary study to a prospective institutional review-board approved study included 82 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, chronic hepatitis B or C virus, or autoimmune hepatitis. Elastography measurements, homodyned K-distribution parametric maps, and total attenuation coefficient slope were recorded. Random forests classification and bootstrapping were used to identify combinations of parameters that provided the highest diagnostic accuracy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed.

Results

For classification of steatosis grade S0 vs. S1-3, S0-1 vs. S2-3, S0-2 vs. S3, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were respectively 0.60, 0.63, and 0.62 with elasticity alone, and 0.90, 0.81, and 0.78 with the best tested model combining QUS and elastography features. For classification of inflammation grade A0 vs. A1-3, A0-1 vs. A2-3, A0-2 vs. A3, AUCs were respectively 0.56, 0.62, and 0.64 with elasticity alone, and 0.75, 0.68, and 0.69 with the best model. For classification of liver fibrosis stage F0 vs. F1-4, F0-1 vs. F2-4, F0-2 vs. F3-4, F0-3 vs. F4, AUCs were respectively 0.66, 0.77, 0.72, and 0.74 with elasticity alone, and 0.72, 0.77, 0.77, and 0.75 with the best model.

Conclusion

Random forest models incorporating QUS and shear wave elastography increased the classification accuracy of liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis when compared to shear wave elastography alone.

SUBMITTER: Destrempes F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8794185 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EBUS) strain elastography can diagnose intrathoracic benign and malignant lymph nodes (LNs) by reflecting the relative stiffness of tissues. Due to strong subjectivity, it is difficult to give full play to the diagnostic efficiency of strain elastography. This study aims to use machine learning to automatically select high-quality and stable representative images from EBUS strain elastography videos.MethodsLNs with qualified strain elastography videos from June 2019 to November 2019 were enrolled in the training and validation sets randomly at a quantity ratio of 3:1 to train an automatic image selection model using machine learning algorithm. The strain elastography videos in December 2019 were used as the test set, from which three representative images were selected for each LN by the model. Meanwhile, three experts and three trainees selected one representative image severally for each LN on the test set. Qualitative grading score and four quantitative methods were used to evaluate images above to assess the performance of the automatic image selection model.ResultsA total of 415 LNs were included in the training and validation sets and 91 LNs in the test set. Result of the qualitative grading score showed that there was no statistical difference between the three images selected by the machine learning model. Coefficient of variation (CV) values of the four quantitative methods in the machine learning group were all lower than the corresponding CV values in the expert and trainee groups, which demonstrated great stability of the machine learning model. Diagnostic performance analysis on the four quantitative methods showed that the diagnostic accuracies were range from 70.33% to 73.63% in the trainee group, 78.02% to 83.52% in the machine learning group, and 80.22% to 82.42% in the expert group. Moreover, there were no statistical differences in corresponding mean values of the four quantitative methods between the machine learning and expert groups (p >0.05).ConclusionThe automatic image selection model established in this study can help select stable and high-quality representative images from EBUS strain elastography videos, which has great potential in the diagnosis of intrathoracic LNs.

Project description:BackgroundThe accurate assessment of liver fibrosis is essential for patients with chronic liver disease. A liver biopsy is an invasive procedure that has many potential defects and complications. Therefore, noninvasive assessment techniques are of considerable value for clinical diagnosis. Liver and spleen magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and serum markers have been proposed for quantitative and noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of liver and spleen stiffness measured by MRE, fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and their combined models for staging hepatic fibrosis.MethodsOne hundred and twenty patients with chronic liver disease underwent MRE scans. Liver and spleen stiffness were measured by the MRE stiffness maps. Serum markers were collected to calculate FIB-4 and APRI. Liver biopsies were used to identify pathologic grading. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis evaluated the correlation between the parameters and fibrosis stages. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated the performance of the four individual parameters, a liver and spleen stiffness combined model, and an all-parameters combined model in assessing liver fibrosis.ResultsLiver stiffness, spleen stiffness, FIB-4, and APRI were all correlated with fibrosis stage (r=0.87, 0.64, 0.65, and 0.51, respectively, all P<0.001). Among the 4 individual diagnostic markers, liver stiffness showed the highest values in staging F1–4, F2–4, F3–4 and F4 (AUC =0.89, 0. 97, 0.95, and 0.95, all P<0.001). The AUCs of the liver and spleen stiffness combined model in the F1–4, F2–4, F3–4, and F4 staging groups were 0.89, 0.97, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively (all P<0.001). The corresponding AUCs of the all-parameters combined model were 0.90, 0.97, 0.95, and 0.96 (all P<0.001). The AUCs of the liver and spleen stiffness combined model were significantly higher than those of APRI, FIB-4 in the F2–4, F3–4, and F4 staging groups (all P<0.05). Both combined models were not significantly different from liver stiffness in staging liver fibrosis (all P>0.05).ConclusionsLiver stiffness measured with MRE had better diagnostic performance than spleen stiffness, APRI, and FIB-4 for fibrosis staging. The combined models did not significantly improve the diagnostic value compared with liver stiffness in staging fibrosis.