Dataset Information

Automated segmentation of biventricular contours in tissue phase mapping using deep learning.

ABSTRACT: Tissue phase mapping (TPM) is an MRI technique for quantification of regional biventricular myocardial velocities. Despite its potential, clinical use is limited due to the requisite labor-intensive manual segmentation of cardiac contours for all time frames. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL) network for automated segmentation of TPM images, without significant loss in segmentation and myocardial velocity quantification accuracy compared with manual segmentation. We implemented a multi-channel 3D (three dimensional; 2D + time) dense U-Net that trained on magnitude and phase images and combined cross-entropy, Dice, and Hausdorff distance loss terms to improve the segmentation accuracy and suppress unnatural boundaries. The dense U-Net was trained and tested with 150 multi-slice, multi-phase TPM scans (114 scans for training, 36 for testing) from 99 heart transplant patients (44 females, 1-4 scans/patient), where the magnitude and velocity-encoded (V_x , V_y , V_z ) images were used as input and the corresponding manual segmentation masks were used as reference. The accuracy of DL segmentation was evaluated using quantitative metrics (Dice scores, Hausdorff distance) and linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses on the resulting peak radial and longitudinal velocities (V_r and V_z ). The mean segmentation time was about 2 h per patient for manual and 1.9 ± 0.3 s for DL. Our network produced good accuracy (median Dice = 0.85 for left ventricle (LV), 0.64 for right ventricle (RV), Hausdorff distance = 3.17 pixels) compared with manual segmentation. Peak V_r and V_z measured from manual and DL segmentations were strongly correlated (R ≥ 0.88) and in good agreement with manual analysis (mean difference and limits of agreement for V_z and V_r were -0.05 ± 0.98 cm/s and -0.06 ± 1.18 cm/s for LV, and -0.21 ± 2.33 cm/s and 0.46 ± 4.00 cm/s for RV, respectively). The proposed multi-channel 3D dense U-Net was capable of reducing the segmentation time by 3,600-fold, without significant loss in accuracy in tissue velocity measurements.

SUBMITTER: Shen D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8795858 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cine displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) measures heart motion by encoding myocardial displacement into the signal phase, facilitating high accuracy and reproducibility of global and segmental myocardial strain and providing benefits in clinical performance. While conventional methods for strain analysis of DENSE images are faster than those for myocardial tagging, they still require manual user assistance. The present study developed and evaluated deep learning methods for fully-automatic DENSE strain analysis.MethodsConvolutional neural networks (CNNs) were developed and trained to (a) identify the left-ventricular (LV) epicardial and endocardial borders, (b) identify the anterior right-ventricular (RV)-LV insertion point, and (c) perform phase unwrapping. Subsequent conventional automatic steps were employed to compute strain. The networks were trained using 12,415 short-axis DENSE images from 45 healthy subjects and 19 heart disease patients and were tested using 10,510 images from 25 healthy subjects and 19 patients. Each individual CNN was evaluated, and the end-to-end fully-automatic deep learning pipeline was compared to conventional user-assisted DENSE analysis using linear correlation and Bland Altman analysis of circumferential strain.ResultsLV myocardial segmentation U-Nets achieved a DICE similarity coefficient of 0.87 ± 0.04, a Hausdorff distance of 2.7 ± 1.0 pixels, and a mean surface distance of 0.41 ± 0.29 pixels in comparison with manual LV myocardial segmentation by an expert. The anterior RV-LV insertion point was detected within 1.38 ± 0.9 pixels compared to manually annotated data. The phase-unwrapping U-Net had similar or lower mean squared error vs. ground-truth data compared to the conventional path-following method for images with typical signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) or low SNR (p < 0.05), respectively. Bland-Altman analyses showed biases of 0.00 ± 0.03 and limits of agreement of - 0.04 to 0.05 or better for deep learning-based fully-automatic global and segmental end-systolic circumferential strain vs. conventional user-assisted methods.ConclusionsDeep learning enables fully-automatic global and segmental circumferential strain analysis of DENSE CMR providing excellent agreement with conventional user-assisted methods. Deep learning-based automatic strain analysis may facilitate greater clinical use of DENSE for the quantification of global and segmental strain in patients with cardiac disease.

Dataset Information

Automated segmentation of biventricular contours in tissue phase mapping using deep learning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets