Dataset Information

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting the overall survival of myxofibrosarcoma patients: a large population-based study

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although some studies have explored prognostic factors of myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), the sample sizes were small, generally fewer than 100 patients. There is still no effective prognostic model for MFS patients based on a large population and comprehensive factors. The present study was designed to establish and validate a large population-based, clinically relevant prognostic nomogram for predicting 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with MFS.

Methods

We identified patients with MFS (ICD-O-3 code: 8811/3) who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and separated them into training and validation cohorts (7:3 ratio). Survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors of survival. An individual nomogram was established to predict OS at 3 and 5 years in MFS patients. The discriminative ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram were compared to those of the traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in the training and validation cohorts. Finally, MFS patients were divided into two subgroups based on the prognostic index (PI) score of the nomogram, and the survival outcomes of the subgroups were compared.

Results

A total of 1,270 patients were included. Age at diagnosis, total number of in situ or malignant tumors, tumor size, tumor site, tumor extension, AJCC stage, surgical status, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were the independent predictors of survival and were included in the nomogram. The nomogram had C-indexes of 0.806 in the training cohort and 0.783 in the validation cohort, which were greater than those of the sixth edition of the AJCC staging system (training cohort, 0.669 and validation cohort, 0.674). Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that the nomogram was useful with high clinical net benefits. Survival outcomes were significantly different between the different risk subgroups (P<0.001).

Conclusions

A novel nomogram based on a large population was constructed to evaluate survival outcomes for MFS. Its predictive efficacy was markedly superior than that of the traditional sixth edition of the AJCC staging system.

SUBMITTER: Cao S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8798403 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundProstate cancer (PC) is the second most common malignant tumor, and its survival is of great concern. However, the assessment of survival risk in current studies is limited. This study is to develop and validate a nomogram for the prediction of survival in PC patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.MethodsA total of 153,796 PC patients were included in this cohort study. Patients were divided into a training set (n=107,657) and a testing set (n=46,139). The 3-, 5- and 10-year survival of the PC patients were regarded as the outcomes. Predictors based on the demographic and pathological data for survival were identified by multivariate Cox regression analysis to develop the predictive nomogram. Internal and subgroup validations were performed to assess the predictive performance of the nomogram. The C-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and corresponding areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were used to estimate the predictive performance of the nomogram.ResultsAge at diagnosis, race, marital status, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) status, Gleason score, and pathological stage were identified as significantly associated with the survival of PC patients (P<0.05). The C-index of the nomogram indicated a moderate predictive ability [training set: C-index =0.782, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.779-0.785; testing set: C-index =0.782, 95% CI: 0.777-0.787]. The AUCs of this nomogram for the 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival were 0.757 (95% CI: 0.756-0.758), 0.741 (95% CI: 0.740-0.742), and 0.716 (95% CI: 0.715-0.717), respectively. The results of subgroup validation showed that all the AUCs for the nomogram at 3, 5, and 10 years were more than 0.70, regardless of marital status and race.ConclusionsWe developed a nomogram with the moderate predictive ability for the long-term survival (3-, 5-, and 10-year survival) of patients with PC.

Project description:BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate the differences in the clinicopathological characteristics of younger and older patients with endometrial cancer (EC) and develop a nomogram to assess the prognosis of early onset EC in terms of overall survival.MethodsPatients diagnosed with EC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015 were selected. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared between younger and older patients, and survival analysis was performed for both groups. Prognostic factors affecting overall survival in young patients with EC were identified using Cox regression. A nomogram was created and internal validation was performed using the consistency index, decision curve analysis, receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration curves. External validation used data from 70 patients with early onset EC. Finally, Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted to compare survival outcomes across the risk subgroups.ResultsA total of 1042 young patients and 12,991 older patients were included in this study. Younger patients were divided into training (732) and validation (310) cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Cox regression analysis identified age, tumorsize, grade, FIGO stage(International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) and surgery as independent risk factors for overall survival, and a nomogram was constructed based on these factors. Internal and external validations demonstrated the good predictive power of the nomogram. In particular, the C-index for the overall survival nomogram was 0.832 [95% confidence interval (0.797-0.844)] in the training cohort and 0.839 (0.810-0.868) in the internal validation cohort. The differences in the Kaplan-Meier curves between the different risk subgroups were statistically significant.ConclusionsIn this study, a nomogram for predicting overall survival of patients with early onset endometrial cancer based on the SEER database was developed to help assess the prognosis of patients and guide clinical treatment.