Dataset Information

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting the overall survival of myxofibrosarcoma patients: a large population-based study

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although some studies have explored prognostic factors of myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), the sample sizes were small, generally fewer than 100 patients. There is still no effective prognostic model for MFS patients based on a large population and comprehensive factors. The present study was designed to establish and validate a large population-based, clinically relevant prognostic nomogram for predicting 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with MFS.

Methods

We identified patients with MFS (ICD-O-3 code: 8811/3) who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and separated them into training and validation cohorts (7:3 ratio). Survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors of survival. An individual nomogram was established to predict OS at 3 and 5 years in MFS patients. The discriminative ability and predictive accuracy of the nomogram were compared to those of the traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in the training and validation cohorts. Finally, MFS patients were divided into two subgroups based on the prognostic index (PI) score of the nomogram, and the survival outcomes of the subgroups were compared.

Results

A total of 1,270 patients were included. Age at diagnosis, total number of in situ or malignant tumors, tumor size, tumor site, tumor extension, AJCC stage, surgical status, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were the independent predictors of survival and were included in the nomogram. The nomogram had C-indexes of 0.806 in the training cohort and 0.783 in the validation cohort, which were greater than those of the sixth edition of the AJCC staging system (training cohort, 0.669 and validation cohort, 0.674). Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that the nomogram was useful with high clinical net benefits. Survival outcomes were significantly different between the different risk subgroups (P<0.001).

Conclusions

A novel nomogram based on a large population was constructed to evaluate survival outcomes for MFS. Its predictive efficacy was markedly superior than that of the traditional sixth edition of the AJCC staging system.

SUBMITTER: Cao S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8798403 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Medulloblastoma is the common pediatric malignant tumor with poor prognosis in cerebellum. However, MB is always with clinical heterogeneity. To provide patients with more clinically beneficial treatment strategies, there is a pressing need to develop a new prognostic prediction model as a supplement to the prediction outcomes of clinical judgment. Materials and Methods:Four datasets of mRNA expression and clinical data were downloaded from gene expression omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and functionally enriched among GSE50161, GSE74195, GSE86574. Then we used STRING and Cytoscape to constructed and analyze protein-protein interaction network (PPI) and hub genes. Univariate cox regression analysis was performed to identify overall survival-related hub genes in an unique dataset from GSE85217 as train cohort. Lasso Cox regression model was used to construct the prognostic gene signature. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC), Kaplan-Meier curve, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic capacity of the twelve-gene signature. A unique dataset from GSE85217 was downloaded to further validate the results. Finally, we established the nomogram by using the gene signature and validated it with ROC curve. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was carried out to further investigate its potential molecular mechanism. Besides, the twelve genes expression at the mRNA and protein levels was validated using external database such as Oncomine, cBioportal and HPA, respectively. Results:A twelve-gene signature comprising FOXM1, NEK2, CCT2, ACTL6A, EIF4A3, CCND2, ABL1, SYNCRIP, ITGB1, NRXN2, ENAH, and UMPS was established to predict overall survival of medulloblastoma. The ROC curve showed good performance in survival prediction in both the train cohort and the validation cohort. The twelve-gene signature could stratify patients into a high risk and low risk group which had significantly different survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression revealed that the twelve-gene signature was an independent prognostic factor in medulloblastoma. Nomogram, which included twelve-gene signatures, was established and showed some clinical benefit. Conclusion:Our study identified a twelve-gene signature and established a prognostic nomogram that reliably predicts overall survival in medulloblastoma. The above results will help us to better analyze the pathogenesis and treatment of medulloblastoma in the future.