Dataset Information

UCP1 modulates immune infiltration level and survival outcome in ovarian cancer patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The uncoupling proteins (UCPs) are critical genes associated with tumorigenesis and chemoresistance. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of the UCPs in ovarian cancer (OV).

Material and methods

UCPs expression analysis was conducted using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), and its potential in clinical prognosis was analyzed using Kaplan- Meier analyses. The influence of UCPs on immune infiltration was analyzed by TIMER. In addition, the correlation between UCPs expression and molecular mechanisms was investigated by TIMER and Cancer Single-cell State Atlas (CancerSEA).

Results

UCP1, UCP2, UCP3 and UCP5 expression levels correlated with a favorable prognosis and tumor progression. Moreover, UCP1 expression correlated to several immune cell markers and regulated tumorigenesis, such as tumor invasion, EMT, metastasis and DNA repair. In addition, UCP1 potentially involved in genes expression of SNAI2, MMP2, BRCA1 and PARP1.

Conclusions

These results implied a critical role of UCP1 in the prognosis and immune infiltration of ovarian cancer. In addition, UCP1 expression participated in regulating multiple oncogenes and tumorigenesis.

SUBMITTER: Huang J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8800348 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIncreasing evidence indicates that immune cell infiltration (ICI) affects the prognosis of multiple cancers. This study aims to explore the immunotypes and ICI-related biomarkers in ovarian cancer.MethodsThe ICI levels were quantified with the CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms. The unsupervised consensus clustering method determined immunotypes based on the ICI profiles. Characteristic genes were identified with the Boruta algorithm. Then, the ICI score, a novel prognostic marker, was generated with the principal component analysis of the characteristic genes. The relationships between the ICI scores and clinical features were revealed. Further, an ICI signature was integrated after the univariate Cox, lasso, and stepwise regression analyses. The accuracy and robustness of the model were tested by three independent cohorts. The roles of the model in the immunophenoscores (IPS), tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) scores, and immunotherapy responses were also explored. Finally, risk genes (GBP1P1, TGFBI, PLA2G2D) and immune cell marker genes (CD11B, NOS2, CD206, CD8A) were tested by qRT-PCR in clinical tissues.ResultsThree immunotypes were identified, and ICI scores were generated based on the 75 characteristic genes. CD8 TCR pathways, chemokine-related pathways, and lymphocyte activation were critical to immunophenotyping. Higher ICI scores contributed to better prognoses. An independent prognostic factor, a three-gene signature, was integrated to calculate patients' risk scores. Higher TIDE scores, lower ICI scores, lower IPS, lower immunotherapy responses, and worse prognoses were revealed in high-risk patients. Macrophage polarization and CD8 T cell infiltration were indicated to play potentially important roles in the development of ovarian cancer in the clinical validation cohort.ConclusionsOur study characterized the immunotyping landscape and provided novel immune infiltration-related prognostic markers in ovarian cancer.

Project description:Objective: Because of the modest immunotherapeutic response among ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients, it is significant to evaluate antitumor immune response and develop more effective precision immunotherapeutic regimens. Here, this study aimed to determine diverse immune subtypes of OC. Methods: This study curated the expression profiles of prognostic immunologically relevant genes and conducted consensus clustering analyses for determining immune subtypes among OC patients in TCGA cohort. With Boruta algorithm, characteristic genes were screened for conducting an immune scoring system through principal component analysis algorithm. The single-sample gene set enrichment analysis and ESTIAMTE methods were adopted for quantifying the immune infiltrates and responses to chemotherapeutic agents were estimated with pRRophetic algorithm. Two immunotherapeutic cohorts were used for investigating the efficacy of immune score in predicting therapeutic benefits. Results: Two immune subtypes were conducted among 377 OC patients. Immune subtype 2 was characterized by worse clinical prognosis, more frequent genetic variations and mutations, enhanced immune infiltrates, and increased expression of MHC molecules and programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1). In total, 30 prognosis-relevant characteristic immune subtype-derived genes were identified for constructing the immune score of OC patients. High immune score was linked with more dismal prognosis, decreased immune infiltrations, and expression of MHC molecules. High immune score presented favorable sensitivity to doxorubicin and vinorelbine and reduced sensitivity to cisplatin. In addition, immune score possessed the potential in predicting benefits from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Conclusion: Collectively, our findings propose two complex and diverse immune subtypes of OC. Quantitative assessment of immune subtypes in individual patients strengthens the understanding of tumor microenvironment features and promotes more effective immunotherapeutic regimens.