Dataset Information

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Australian Tertiary Centre Experience.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Countries who suffered large COVID-19 outbreaks reported a decrease in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentations and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of the pandemic in countries like Australia, with relatively small outbreaks yet significant social restrictions, is relatively unknown. There is also limited and conflicting data regarding the impact on clinical outcomes, symptom-to-door time (STDT) and door-to-balloon time (DTBT).

Methods

Consecutive ACS patients treated with PCI were prospectively recruited from a tertiary hospital network in Melbourne, Australia. The pre-pandemic period (11 March 2019-10 March 2020) was compared to the pandemic period (11 March 2020-10 May 2020) using an interrupted time series analysis with a primary endpoint of number PCI-treated ACS per day. Secondary endpoints included STDT, DTBT, total mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Results

A total 984 ACS patients (14.8% during the pandemic period) received PCI. Mean number of PCI-treated ACS per day did not differ between the two periods (2.3 vs 2.4, p=0.61) with no difference in STDT [+51.3 mins, 95% confidence interval (CI) -52.4 to 154.9, p=0.33], 30-day mortality (5% vs 5.3%, p=0.86) or MACE (5.2% vs 6.1%, p=0.68). DTBT was significantly longer during the pandemic versus the pre-pandemic period (+18.1 mins, 95% CI 1.6-34.5, p=0.03) and improved with time (slope estimate: -0.76, 95% CI -1.62 to 0.10).

Conclusions

Despite significant social restrictions imposed in Melbourne, numbers of ACS treated with PCI and 30-day outcomes were similar to pre-pandemic times. DTBT was significantly longer during the COVID-19 pandemic period, likely reflecting infection control measures, which reassuringly improved with time.

SUBMITTER: Ramzy J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8836676 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Australian Tertiary Centre Experience.

Ramzy John J Martin Catherine A CA Burgess Sonya S Gooley Robert R Zaman Sarah S

Heart, lung & circulation 20220211 6

<h4>Background</h4>Countries who suffered large COVID-19 outbreaks reported a decrease in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentations and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of the pandemic in countries like Australia, with relatively small outbreaks yet significant social restrictions, is relatively unknown. There is also limited and conflicting data regarding the impact on clinical outcomes, symptom-to-door time (STDT) and door-to-balloon time (DTBT).<h4>Methods</h4>Consecutiv ...[more]

PMID: 35165052

Similar Datasets

Project description:RationaleTo address the inaccessibility of interventional cardiac services in North Queensland a new cardiac catheterisation laboratory (CCL) was established in Mackay Base Hospital (MBH) in February 2014.ObjectiveTo determine whether the provision of in-house angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 1) minimises treatment delays 2) further reduces the risk of mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and recurrent ischaemia 3) improves patient satisfaction and 4) minimises cost expenditure compared with inter-hospital transfer for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).MethodsWe compared ACS patients who were transferred to tertiary centres from July 2012 to June 2013 with those who received in-house angiography and/or PCI from February 2015 to January 2016. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) or recurrent ischaemia at six months. Pre-specified secondary outcomes were the composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent MI or recurrent ischaemia at one month, a summated patient satisfaction score and the proportional cost savings generated between 2015 and 2016.ResultsWe included consecutive samples of 203 patients from July 2012 to June 2013 and 229 patients from February 2015 to January 2016. There was a reduction in the median time to treatment of 3.2 days and a reduction in the median length of stay of four days amongst all ACS patients receiving in-house angiography and/or PCI. The primary outcome occurred in 14 (6.9%) patients in the 2012 to 2013 group, as compared with 18 (7.9%) patients in the 2015 to 2016 group (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.24-2.1, P = 0.54). The secondary outcome at one month occurred in four (2.0%) patients in the 2012 to 2013 group, as compared with three (1.3%) patients in the 2015 to 2016 group (OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.11-13.1, P = 0.87). There was a statistically significant improvement in the summated patient satisfaction score amongst patients who received in-house angiography and/or PCI (U = 1918, P <0.05 two tailed). A calculation of estimated cost savings showed a reduction in proportional cost of $14 481 (51%) per ACS patient receiving in house angiography and/or PCI between 2015 and 2016.ConclusionThis study suggests that the provision of regional in-house angiography and/or PCI for the treatment of ACS minimises delays to invasive treatment by 3.2 days, minimises the median length of stay by four days, significantly improves patient satisfaction and reduces proportional treatment costs by $14 481 (51%) per patient. Currently, however, it appears that that in-house treatment does not further reduce the risk of mortality, recurrent MI and recurrent ischaemia at one and six months.

Project description:Background Complete revascularization reduces cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) and multivessel disease. The optimal time point of non-target-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of early (<4 weeks) versus late (≥4 weeks) staged PCI of non-target-vessels in patients with ACS scheduled for staged PCI after hospital discharge. Methods and Results All patients with ACS undergoing planned staged PCI from 2009 to 2017 at Bern University Hospital, Switzerland, were analyzed. Patients with cardiogenic shock, in-hospital staged PCI, staged cardiac surgery, and multiple staged PCIs were excluded. The primary end point was all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction and urgent premature non-target-vessel PCI. Of 8657 patients with ACS, staged revascularization was planned in 1764 patients, of whom 1432 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. At 1 year, there were no significant differences in the crude or adjusted rates of the primary end point (7.8% early versus 10.8% late, hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.47-1.10], P=0.129; adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.50-1.28], P=0.346) and its individual components (all-cause death: 1.5% versus 2.9%, HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.20-1.33], P=0.170; adjusted HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.23-1.67], P=0.343; recurrent myocardial infarction: 4.2% versus 4.4%, HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.475-1.10], P=0.924; adjusted HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.53-2.01], P=0.935; non-target-vessel PCI, 3.9% versus 5.7%, HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.53-1.80], P=0.928; adjusted HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.61-2.34], P=0.609). Conclusions In this single-center cohort study of patients with ACS scheduled to undergo staged PCI after hospital discharge, early (<4 weeks) versus late (≥4 weeks) staged PCI was associated with a similar rate of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year follow-up. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02241291.

Project description:BackgroundPrior Studies have suggested better outcomes in smokers compared with nonsmokers receiving clopidogrel ("smoker's paradox"). The impact of a more intensive clopidogrel regimen on ischemic and bleeding risks in smokers with acute coronary syndromes requiring percutaneous coronary interventions remains unclear.Methods and resultsWe analyzed 17 263 acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention from the CURRENT-OASIS 7 (Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events-Seventh Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Symptoms) trial, which compared double-dose (600 mg day 1;150 mg days 2-7; then 75 mg daily) versus standard-dose (300 mg day 1; then 75 mg daily) clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days. Interactions between treatment allocation and smoking status (current smokers versus nonsmokers) were evaluated. Overall, 6394 patients (37.0%) were current smokers. For the comparison of double- versus standard-dose clopidogrel, there were significant interactions in smokers and nonsmokers for the primary outcome (P=0.031) and major bleeding (P=0.002). Double- versus standard-dose clopidogrel reduced the primary outcome among smokers by 34% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.87, P=0.003), whereas in nonsmokers, there was no apparent benefit (HR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.80-1.14, P=0.61). For major bleeding, there was no difference between the groups in smokers (HR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.48-1.24, P=0.28), whereas in nonsmokers, the double-dose clopidogrel regimen increased bleeding (HR 1.89, 95% CI, 1.37-2.60, P<0.0001). Double-dose clopidogrel reduced the incidence of definite stent thrombosis in smokers (HR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.24-0.71) and nonsmokers (HR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.42-0.93; P for interaction=0.19).ConclusionsIn smokers, a double-dose clopidogrel regimen reduced major cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention, with no increase in major bleeding. This suggests that clopidogrel dosing in patients with acute coronary syndromes should be personalized, taking into consideration both ischemic and bleeding risk.Clinical trial registrationURL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00335452.

Dataset Information

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Australian Tertiary Centre Experience.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: An Australian Tertiary Centre Experience.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets