Dataset Information

Buccal Mucosal Grafts as a Novel Treatment for the Repair of Rectovaginal Fistulas: Protocol for an Upcoming Prospective Single-Surgeon Case Series.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) are abnormal communications between the rectum/anus and the vagina. They are most frequently formed a result of obstetric injury and have deleterious effects on patients' quality of life. Despite several treatment modalities, RVFs remain difficult problems to manage, and many patients fail multiple attempts at surgical repair. Buccal mucosal grafts (BMGs) may be a solution to this problem. A BMG is an oral mucosal tissue harvested from the inner cheek. There are 2 case reports that describe the successful use of BMGs in the repair of RVFs.

Objective

Our objective is to validate these findings with a prospective case series while also addressing the key issues of indication, technical details, procedure safety, and short-term outcomes.

Methods

A prospective single-surgeon case series will be undertaken at a university-affiliated academic tertiary care hospital in Calgary, Alberta (Canada). The estimated recruitment is between 3 and 5 patients. Patients will undergo surgical repair of their RVFs with an autologous BMG. Data on patient characteristics, fistula characteristics, and surgical variables will be collected and analyzed prospectively. The primary outcome is fistula closure. This study has been approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (REB20-1123).

Results

Two previous case reports have described the successful use of BMGs in the repair of RVFs. We have received ethics approval to attempt to validate these findings through a prospective case series.

Conclusions

RVFs cause significant patient morbidity and are difficult problems to manage. Bolstered by the successful use of BMGs in urologic surgery and the previously published case reports demonstrating success in RVFs, we believe that BMGs may be a solution to RVFs.

International registered report identifier (irrid)

PRR1-10.2196/31003.

SUBMITTER: Cahill C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9107045 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOver the past five decades, microsuturing has been established as the "gold standard" for nerve repair. Alternative techniques such as fibrin glue, protein "welds", and nerve connectors have been met with variable enthusiasm. While advancements in this area continue, there is little data on surgeon attitude and acceptance of these new techniques.MethodsA short questionnaire was electronically distributed to the members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the American Association of Hand Surgery. Survey questions ascertained demographic information of participants (specialty, years in practice, practice setting, etc.), attitudes about current techniques (what techniques currently used, why, etc.), and attitudes about new techniques (openness to trying, factors that would persuade for/against, etc.). The surveys were distributed and administered online. Data gathered from responses was analyzed looking for general trends and stratified based on demographic data.ResultsThe majority of responders still consider microsuturing as the gold standard for primary nerve repair, and it is by far the most utilized technique. However, over 90 % also reported that they either currently use or would consider using alternate techniques. Common barriers to utilizing alternate techniques included lack of data regarding outcomes and unfamiliarity with new techniques. Only 40 % of responders considered metal as safe around nerves, but most consider absorbable polymers safe. None of the underlying demographic variables including years in practice, number of nerve repair surgeries performed per month, practice setting, or specialty affected these general trends.ConclusionsMost surgeons performing nerve repairs prefer suturing as their primary repair technique, but a vast majority is open to utilizing alternate repair techniques, especially those that improve outcomes with a faster and easier procedure. While not able to direct clinical practice guidelines, this study can be used to direct focus and funding of further alternate nerve repair techniques.