Dataset Information

Cortisol in relation to problematic eating behaviours, adiposity and symptom profiles in Major Depressive Disorder.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is associated with an increased risk of chronic disease related to weight gain, problematic eating behaviours and neuroendocrine changes. MDD is frequently associated with altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity and cortisol secretion, where cortisol has been implicated in regulating energy balance, food intake and depressogenic weight changes. However, little research has examined the relationships between cortisol, adiposity and depressogenic problematic eating behaviours.

Method

Plasma cortisol concentrations were compared between 37 participants with MDD reporting appetite/weight loss, 43 participants with MDD reporting appetite/weight gain, and 60 healthy controls, by sex. Associations between cortisol, indices of adiposity and problematic eating behaviours were then assessed after accounting for demographic variables and depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Depression subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, and eating behaviours with the Dutch Eating Behaviours Questionnaire and Yale Food Addiction Scale.

Results

Participants with MDD reporting appetite/weight loss had higher cortisol compared to controls, and marginally higher cortisol than those with MDD reporting appetite/weight gain. Cortisol negatively and significantly accounted for unique variance in body mass index and waist circumference after accounting for variance associated with age, sex and depressive symptoms, however it was not a significant predictor of problematic eating behaviours, such as emotional eating or food addiction. Cortisol concentrations did not differ between sexes.

Conclusion

The results indicate that cortisol is related to lower indices of adiposity and depressogenic symptoms of appetite/weight loss but is not related to problematic eating behaviours and appetite increases in MDD. These findings provide further evidence that the melancholic and atypical subtypes of MDD are associated with differential neuroendocrine and anthropometric indices, as well as behavioural and symptom profiles. Further research investigating the temporal nature of the identified relationships may assist in facilitating the development of improved interventions for individuals affected by weight changes in MDD.

SUBMITTER: Mills JG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9216397 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLower inhibitory control has been associated with obesity. One prediction is that lower inhibitory control underlies eating behaviours that promote increased energy intakes. This study examined the relationships between children's inhibitory control measured using the Stop Signal Task (SST), body composition and eating behaviours, which included self-served portion size, number of servings, eating rate, and energy intake at lunch and in an eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) task.MethodsThe sample included 255 6-year-old children from an Asian cohort. Stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) was used as an index of inhibitory control. Children participated in a recorded self-served lunchtime meal, followed by the EAH task where they were exposed to energy-dense snacks. Behavioural coding of oral processing was used to estimate eating rates (g/min). BMI, waist circumference and skinfolds were used as indices of adiposity.ResultsChildren with lower inhibitory control tended to self-serve larger food portions (p = 0.054), had multiple food servings (p = 0.006) and significantly faster eating rates (p = 0.041). Inhibitory control did not predict energy intake at lunch (p = 0.17) or during the EAH task (p = 0.45), and was unrelated to measures of adiposity (p > 0.32). Twenty percent of the children in the sample had problems focusing on the SST and were described as 'restless'. Post-hoc analysis revealed that these children had lower inhibitory control (p < 0.001) and consumed more energy during the EAH task (p = 0.01), but did not differ in any other key outcomes from the rest of the sample (p > 0.1).ConclusionsChildren with lower inhibitory control showed a trend to select larger food portions, had multiple food servings and faster eating rates, but were equally as responsive to snacks served in the absence of hunger as children with better inhibitory control. Inhibitory control may impact a number of eating behaviours, not limited to energy-dense snacks.