Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitor Plus Platinum-Etoposide Chemotherapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC: A Prospective Observational Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

To date, the efficacy and safety of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), with real-world evidence, stratified on the basis of age and performance status (PS), have not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC.

Methods

This multicenter prospective study evaluated patients with ES-SCLC who received PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy between September 2019 and October 2021.

Results

A total of 45 patients with ES-SCLC received the aforementioned treatment, including 18 elderly (≥75 y old) patients and six patients with a PS of 2. Multivariate analysis indicated that a PS of 2 was a significant independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.008 and p = 0.001, respectively). Of patients with PS of 2 at the initial phase, those that achieved PS improvement during treatment had significantly longer progression-free survival and overall survival than those who did not (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02, respectively). The incidence of adverse events accompanied with treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in the elderly patients than in the non-elderly patients (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

This real-world prospective study found that PD-L1 inhibitor plus platinum-etoposide chemotherapy had limited efficacy in patients with ES-SCLC with a PS of 2, except for cases with improvement of PS during treatment. Owing to the emergence of adverse events and treatment discontinuation, this treatment should be administered with caution in elderly patients with ES-SCLC.

SUBMITTER: Morimoto K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9250020 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionThe real-world data evaluating treatment outcomes of atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy (atezolizumab) for extensive-stage SCLC (ESCLC) are lacking. Our objective was to evaluate real-world outcomes of ESCLC treated with atezolizumab.MethodsA retrospective analysis of provincial patients with ESCLC who started first-line (1L) systemic treatment was conducted. We primarily evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in association with atezolizumab compared with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy (chemotherapy) while adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical factors. Adverse events (AEs) during 1L were evaluated.ResultsA total of 67 patients were identified. Of the 34 patients who received atezolizumab, 24% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2, approximately 50% were more than or equal to 65 years, 21% received cisplatin-etoposide chemotherapy before atezolizumab, and 12% had thoracic radiation (tRT).Within the atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, the median PFS equals to 6.0 versus 4.3 months (p = 0.03) whereas OS = 12.8 versus 7.1 months (p = 0.01). Relative to chemotherapy, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for PFS was 0.53 (0.28-1.02) and OS was 0.42 (0.20-0.88) with atezolizumab. tRT compared with no tRT receipt correlated with reduced death risk (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.33 [0.13-0.88]).AE-related treatment withdrawal with atezolizumab was 32% and 15% with chemotherapy (p = 0.02). Within the tRT subgroup, 25% versus 20% in atezolizumab versus chemotherapy group, respectively, discontinued 1L owing to AE.ConclusionsThis is the first real-world study revealing comparable survival with that in the IMpower133 trial. Treatment discontinuation from AEs was higher with atezolizumab among Canadian patients with ESCLC. Our data suggest safe use of tRT and chemoimmunotherapy, but its efficacy for ESCLC warrants further study.

Project description:IntroductionThe study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04346914) is an open label, single-arm, phase 1b clinical trial investigating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the recombinant human anti-programmed death-ligand 1 monoclonal antibody socazolimab in combination with carboplatin and etoposide in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage SCLC. Good safety and efficacy were found in previous phase 1 clinical trials of other cancers, such as cervix cancer.MethodsPatients received socazolimab (5 mg/kg) every three weeks until disease progression or physician decision. Carboplatin (area under the curve: 5) was also administered every three weeks and etoposide (100 mg/m2) on days 1, 2, and 3 of the treatment cycle. The primary purpose of the study was safety measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Secondary purposes included objective response rate, progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall survival.ResultsFrom April 15, 2020 (enrollment date), to December 30, 2021 (data cutoff), 20 patients with extensive-stage SCLC were administered with socazolimab, carboplatin, and etoposide. Objective response rate was 70.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.72%-88.11%). Median progression-free survival was 5.65 months (95% CI: 4.14-6.54), and the median duration of response was 4.29 months (95% CI: 2.76-5.85). Median overall survival was 14.88 months (95% CI: 10.09-not evaluated). The highest incidence of treatment-related adverse events included anemia (100%), decreased neutrophil count (95%), decreased platelet count (95%), and decreased white blood cell count (95%), which occurred during combination therapy. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (90%), decreased white blood cell count (65%), decreased platelet count (50%), and anemia (30%), which were also common adverse reactions of chemotherapy. No adverse events leading to death had occurred.ConclusionsResults revealed that the combination therapy of socazolimab, carboplatin, and etoposide had preliminarily confirmed the safety of socazolimab in the first-line treatment of SCLC combined with EC chemotherapy. Currently, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04878016) is being conducted with 498 patients.

Project description:PurposeLocally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is an incurable disease with limited treatment options, especially for patients who were previously treated with platinum and anti-programmed death 1 or anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) therapy. Enfortumab vedotin is an antibody-drug conjugate that targets Nectin-4, which is highly expressed in urothelial carcinoma.MethodsEV-201 is a global, phase II, single-arm study of enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg (intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with platinum chemotherapy and anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. The primary end point was objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 by blinded independent central review. Key secondary end points were duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and tolerability.ResultsEnfortumab vedotin was administered to 125 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Median follow-up was 10.2 months (range, 0.5 to 16.5 months). Confirmed objective response rate was 44% (95% CI, 35.1% to 53.2%), including 12% complete responses. Similar responses were observed in prespecified subgroups, such as those patients with liver metastases and those with no response to prior anti-PD-1/L1 therapy. Median duration of response was 7.6 months (range, 0.95 to 11.30+ months). The most common treatment-related adverse events were fatigue (50%), any peripheral neuropathy (50%), alopecia (49%), any rash (48%), decreased appetite (44%), and dysgeusia (40%). No single treatment-related adverse events grade 3 or greater occurred in 10% or more of patients.ConclusionEnfortumab vedotin demonstrated a clinically meaningful response rate with a manageable and tolerable safety profile in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who were previously treated with platinum and anti-PD-1/L1 therapies.