Dataset Information

Oral Fluoroquinolone Use and the Risk of Acute Liver Injury: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Antibiotics are considered to be among the most frequent causes of drug-related acute liver injury (ALI). Although many ALIs have mild and reversible clinical outcomes, there is substantial risk of severe reactions leading to acute liver failure, need for liver transplant, and death. Recent studies have raised concerns of hepatotoxic potential related to the use of fluoroquinolones.

Methods

This study examined the risk of ALI associated with oral fluoroquinolone treatment compared with amoxicillin (419 930 courses, propensity score matched 1:1). The information on drug use was collected from a national, registry-based cohort derived from all Swedish adults aged 40-85 years.

Results

During a follow-up period of 60 days, users of oral fluoroquinolones had a >2-fold risk of ALI compared to users of amoxicillin (hazard ratio, 2.32 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.01-5.35). The adjusted absolute risk difference for use of fluoroquinolones as compared to amoxicillin was 4.94 (95% CI, .04-16.3) per 1 million episodes.

Conclusions

In this propensity score-matched study, fluoroquinolone treatment was associated with an increased risk of ALI in the first 2 months after starting treatment.

SUBMITTER: Nibell O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9258930 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To evaluate if oral fluoroquinolone use is associated with an increased risk of serious arrhythmia.Bi-national cohort study, linking register data on filled prescriptions, cases of serious arrhythmia, and patient characteristics.Denmark, 1997-2011; Sweden, 2006-13.The study cohort was derived from a source population of all Danish and Swedish adults, aged 40 to 79 years. 909,656 courses of fluoroquinolone use (ciprofloxacin 82.6%, norfloxacin 12.1%, ofloxacin 3.2%, moxifloxacin 1.2%, and other fluoroquinolones 0.9%) and 909,656 courses of penicillin V use, matched 1:1 on propensity score, were included.The main outcome was risk of serious arrhythmia (fatal and non-fatal), comparing courses of fluoroquinolone use with courses of penicillin V use (an antibiotic with no pro-arrhythmic effect). The risk period of interest was current use, defined as days 0-7 of treatment. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to country, sex, age, underlying cardiovascular disease, concomitant use of drugs known to increase the risk of torsades de pointes, fluoroquinolone type, and levels of arrhythmia risk score.144 cases of serious arrhythmia occurred during follow-up, 66 among current fluoroquinolone users (incidence rate 3.4 per 1000 person years) and 78 among current penicillin users (4.0 per 1000 person years); comparing oral fluoroquinolone treatment with penicillin V, the rate ratio was 0.85 (95% confidence interval 0.61 to 1.18). Compared with penicillin V, the absolute risk difference was -13 (95% confidence interval -35 to 16) cases of serious arrhythmia per 1,000,000 courses of fluoroquinolones. The risk of serious arrhythmia was not statistically significantly increased in any of the subgroups, including analyses by fluoroquinolone type.Contrary to previous reports, oral fluoroquinolone treatment was not associated with an increased risk of serious arrhythmia in the general adult populations of Denmark and Sweden. Given the statistical power of the study, even small increases in relative and absolute risk could be ruled out. Since ciprofloxacin was the most commonly used fluoroquinolone in our study, we cannot exclude that intraclass differences influence the risk of serious arrhythmia associated with other less frequently used fluoroquinolones.

Project description:Study objectiveTo estimate the incidence and relative risk of a hospitalization or emergency visit for noninfectious liver injury in users of eight oral antimicrobials-amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, clarithromycin, cefuroxime, doxycycline, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, telithromycin-compared with nonusers of these antimicrobials.DesignRetrospective, observational cohort study with a nested case-control analysis.Data sourceHealthCore Integrated Research Database.PatientsAdults with continuous health plan enrollment for at least 6 months before study entry who had a new dispensing of a study antimicrobial between July 1, 2001, and March 31, 2009. Cases had diagnoses indicating noninfectious liver injury during follow-up. To control for potentially confounding risk factors, 10 controls at risk for liver injury during follow-up were matched to each case by age, sex, and event date (liver injury date of the case), and analyses were adjusted for medical history, concomitant drugs, and health care service use.Measurements and main resultsTwo physician reviewers (blind to exposure) validated the cases. Among 1.3 million antimicrobial users, we identified 607 cases of liver injury, including 82 cases of severe hepatocellular injury and 11 cases of liver failure. Liver injury incidence in nonusers of study antimicrobials was 35/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-42/100,000 person-years). For valid cases, the adjusted relative risk among current users of multiple antimicrobials was 3.2 (95% CI 1.6-6.7). Levofloxacin had the highest relative risk for current single use (3.2, 95% CI 1.8-5.8). Relative risks were also elevated for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (2.5, 95% CI 1.3-5.0), doxycycline (2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.2), moxifloxacin (2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7), and amoxicillin (2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7).ConclusionThe results support a comparatively high adjusted relative risk of liver injury among patients exposed concurrently to multiple antimicrobials and modest elevations in the risk for several antimicrobials used alone; however, we found little evidence of any strong effect of commonly used antimicrobials on the risk of liver injury.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough fluoroquinolones are sometimes associated with mild, transient elevations in aminotransferase levels, serious acute liver injury is uncommon. Regulatory warnings have identified moxifloxacin as presenting a particular risk of hepatotoxicity. Thus, we examined the risk of idiosyncratic acute liver injury associated with the use of moxifloxacin relative to other selected antibiotic agents.MethodsWe conducted a population-based, nested, case-control study using health care data from Ontario for the period April 2002 to March 2011. We identified cases as outpatients aged 66 years or older with no history of liver disease, and who were admitted to hospital for acute liver injury within 30 days of receiving a prescription for 1 of 5 broad-spectrum antibiotic agents: moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, cefuroxime axetil or clarithromycin. For each case, we selected up to 10 age- and sex-matched controls from among patients who had received a study antibiotic, but who were not admitted to hospital for acute liver injury. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) to determine the association between admission to hospital and previous exposure to an antibiotic agent, using clarithromycin as the reference.ResultsA total of 144 patients were admitted to hospital for acute liver injury within 30 days of receiving a prescription for one of the identified drugs. Of these patients, 88 (61.1%) died while in hospital. After multivariable adjustment, use of either moxifloxacin (adjusted OR 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-3.98) or levofloxacin (adjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.01-3.39) was associated with an increase in risk of acute liver injury relative to the use of clarithromycin. We saw no such risk associated with the use of either ciprofloxacin or cefuroxime axetil.InterpretationAmong older outpatients with no evidence of liver disease, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin were associated with an increased risk of acute liver injury relative to clarithromycin.

Project description:Study questionIs oral contraceptive use around the time of pregnancy onset associated with an increased risk of major birth defects?MethodsIn a prospective observational cohort study, data on oral contraceptive use and major birth defects were collected among 880,694 live births from Danish registries between 1997 and 2011. We conservatively assumed that oral contraceptive exposure lasted up to the most recently filled prescription. The main outcome measure was the number of major birth defects throughout one year follow-up (defined according to the European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies classification). Logistic regression estimated prevalence odds ratios of any major birth defect as well as categories of birth defect subgroups.Study answer and limitationsPrevalence of major birth defects (per 1000 births) was consistent across each oral contraceptive exposure group (25.1, never users; 25.0, use >3 months before pregnancy onset (reference group); 24.9, use 0-3 months before pregnancy onset (that is, recent use); 24.8, use after pregnancy onset). No increase in prevalence of major birth defects was seen with oral contraceptive exposure among women with recent use before pregnancy (prevalence odds ratio 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03)) or use after pregnancy onset (0.95 (0.84 to 1.08)), compared with the reference group. There was also no increase in prevalence of any birth defect subgroup (for example, limb defects). It is unknown whether women took oral contraceptives up to the date of their most recently filled prescription. Also, the rarity of birth defects made disaggregation of the results difficult. Residual confounding was possible, and the analysis lacked information on folate, one of the proposed mechanisms.What this study addsOral contraceptive exposure just before or during pregnancy does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major birth defects.Funding, competing interests, data sharingBMC was funded by the Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health's Maternal Health Task Force and Department of Epidemiology Rose Traveling Fellowship; training grant T32HD060454 in reproductive, perinatal, and paediatric epidemiology and award F32HD084000 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; and grant T32CA09001 from the National Cancer Institute. The authors have no competing interests or additional data to share.

Project description:Liver cirrhotic predisposes patients to coagulopathy and bleeding. Little is known about outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in cirrhotic patients.Data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database during 2001 to 2013 were retrieved for patients admitted with cirrhosis and AMI. We excluded patients with missing information, <20 years old, previous AMI, previous coronary intervention, and liver transplant. Patients were separated into cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: recurrent MI, revascularization, ischemic stroke, and heart failure), and liver outcomes (hepatic encephalopathy, ascites tapping, spontaneous peritonitis, and esophageal varices bleeding).A total of 3217 cirrhotic patients and 6434 non-cirrhotic patients were analyzed, with a mean follow up of 2.8 ± 3.3 years. In cirrhotic patients with AMI, subsequent coronary and cerebrovascular events were lower in comparison to non-cirrhotic patients, with higher all-cause mortality observed from adverse liver related outcomes and bleeding. There were significantly lower cumulative incidence of both recurrent MI and MACCE in cirrhotic patients with AMI compared with non-cirrhotic patients with AMI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.94, P = .006 and HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92, P < .001, respectively). There was significantly higher cumulative incidence of liver related outcome in cirrhotic patients with AMI compared with non-cirrhotic patients with AMI (HR 2.27, 95% CI 2.06-2.51, P < .001). And there was significantly higher all-cause mortality in cirrhotic patients with AMI compared with non-cirrhotic patients with AMI (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.23-1.38, P < .001).In cirrhotic cohort with AMI, a decreased in coronary and cerebrovascular events were observed. However, these patients also had higher all-cause mortality due to adverse liver outcomes and bleeding.

Project description:Background & aimsCurrently, there is limited knowledge on the clinical profile of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in Chinese children. We aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, suspected drugs, and outcomes associated with pediatric DILI in China.MethodsThis nationwide, multicenter, retrospective study, conducted between 2012 and 2014, analyzed 25,927 cases of suspected DILI at 308 medical centers using the inpatient medical register system. Utilizing the Roussel Uclaf causality assessment method score, only patients with scores ≥6 or diagnosed with DILI by three experts after scoring <6 were included in the analysis. Among them, 460 cases met the EASL biochemical criteria. The study categorized children into three age groups: toddlers (≥30 days to <6 years old), school-age children (6 to <12 years old), and adolescents (12 to <18 years old).ResultsHepatocellular injury was the predominant clinical classification, accounting for 63% of cases, with 34% of these cases meeting Hy's law criteria. Adolescents comprised the majority of children with moderate/severe DILI (65%). Similarly, adolescents faced a significantly higher risk of severe liver injury compared to younger children (adjusted odd ratios 4.75, p = 0.002). The top three most frequently prescribed drug classes across all age groups were antineoplastic agents (25.9%), antimicrobials (21.5%), and traditional Chinese medicine (13.7%). For adolescents, the most commonly suspected drugs were antitubercular drugs (22%) and traditional Chinese medicine (23%).ConclusionAdolescents are at a greater risk of severe and potentially fatal liver injury compared to younger children. Recognizing the risk of pediatric DILI is crucial for ensuring safe medical practices.Impact and implicationsDrug-induced liver injury, a poorly understood yet serious cause of pediatric liver disease, encompasses a spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from asymptomatic liver enzyme elevation to acute liver failure. This retrospective study, utilizing a large Chinese cohort of pediatric liver injury cases from 308 centers nationwide, characterized the major clinical patterns and suspected drugs in detail, revealing that adolescents are at a greater risk of severe liver injury compared to younger children. Vigilant care and careful surveillance of at-risk pediatric patients are crucial for physicians, researchers, patients, caregivers, and policymakers. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to evaluate the risk of hepatotoxicity in outpatients and hospitalized pediatric patients.