Dataset Information

Sensitisation profile of Chinese allergic rhinitis patients and effectiveness of a joint allergy-ENT clinic

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

House dust mite (HDM) is the predominant cause of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Hong Kong but remains under-diagnosed and -treated. The association between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and nasoendoscopy findings for AR have also not been investigated. This study investigated the demographics, sensitisation patterns, quality of life, use of sublingual immunotherapy and the association of PROMs and nasoendoscopy findings in AR patients through the first allergist–otorhinolaryngologists AR joint (ARJ) clinic in Hong Kong.

Methods

This single-centred, retrospective observational study was conducted between January 2021 and December 2021. Clinical data from AR patients attending the ARJ clinic were analysed to identify the prevalence of HDM allergens, change in PROMs and the association of PROMs with nasoendoscopy scores.

Results

The three most common sensitising HDM allergens were Dermatophagoides pterynosinus (94.4%), Dermatophagoides farinae (88.9%) and Euroglyphus maynei (88.9%). At the 13- to 32-week follow-up (median 28 weeks), patients who attended the ARJ clinic had significant improvement in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS; p = 0.038). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was associated with nasoendoscopy score (p = 0.018). Patients using SLIT (sublingual immunotherapy) showed overall improvements in PROMs.

Conclusion

The ARJ clinic significantly improved AR symptoms. SLIT was effective and safe for patients who failed conventional treatments. VAS positively correlated with nasoendoscopy findings. Testing for Dermatophagoides pterynosinus as a single agent during skin testing was sufficient for the diagnosis of HDM AR and should be prioritized when resources are restricted. Further studies should be done to investigate the treatment outcome of AR patients and the effectiveness of SLIT in the Chinese population.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40629-022-00218-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

SUBMITTER: Hui H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9261891 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) is characterized by the occurrence of at least 2 symptoms of nasal itching, nasal blockage, rhinorrhea, and sneezing, when not afflicted with a cold or flu, with defined atopic sensitization demonstrated by skin prick test or specific IgE responses. Besides the detriment to standard of living and economic burden of AR, both multicentre and single-cohort studies have observed an increase in AR prevalence in Asia over time.MethodsIn total, 12 872 individuals, with mean age 22.1 years (SD = 4.8), were recruited from universities in Singapore and Malaysia. Each participant provided epidemiological data based on an investigator-administered questionnaire adapted from the validated International Study of Allergies and Asthma in Childhood (ISAAC) protocol, and atopy status was determined using a skin prick test (SPT) performed by qualified staff. AR was diagnosed according to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines and a positive SPT result.ResultsSensitization (determined by SPT) to either Blomia tropicalis or Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus was prevalent in 66.5% of the cohort. Current rhinitis (manifesting ≥2 rhinitis symptoms, within the past 12 months) was observed in 48.9% of our population, while AR, which included atopy status, was estimated at 39.4%. Sneezing and rhinorrhea were the most common symptoms among AR cases. AR prevalence decreased with increasing age (OR: 0.979; 95% CI: 0.969-0.989), while male gender (OR: 2.053; 95% CI: 1.839-2.294), and a parental history of allergic diseases (OR: 2.750; 95% CI: 2.284-3.316) were significant risk factors for AR. Upon adjustment for age, gender, and parental history, housing type (OR: 0.632; 95% CI: 0.543-0.736) and income level (>$6000 vs <$2000; OR: 2.461; 95% CI: 2.058-2.947) remained as significant risk factors for AR, while ever having kept a pet (OR: 1.167; 95% CI: 1.025-1.328) emerged as a risk factor. Conflicting results were obtained for indicators of sedentary lifestyle: frequent physical activity (OR: 1.394; 95% CI: 1.150-1.694) and increased duration spent using the TV/computer (OR: 1.224; 95% CI: 1.006-1.489) both increased the risk of AR. Lastly, we used the Quality of Diet based on Glycaemic Index Score (QDGIS) to assess the Glycaemic Index (GI) level of overall diet. We identified lower GI level of overall diet as a protective factor against AR manifestation (OR: 0.682; 95% CI: 0.577-0.807).ConclusionWhile the previously established non-modifiable risk factors for AR were present in our study population, the identification of modifiable risk factors, such as TV/computer usage, and dietary habits, opens a new area for research, both in the areas of gene-environment interaction, and management of AR.