Dataset Information

A new 2D-3D registration gold-standard dataset for the hip joint based on uncertainty modeling.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Estimation of the accuracy of 2D-3D registration is paramount for a correct evaluation of its outcome in both research and clinical studies. Publicly available datasets with standardized evaluation methodology are necessary for validation and comparison of 2D-3D registration techniques. Given the large use of 2D-3D registration in biomechanics, we introduced the first gold standard validation dataset for computed tomography (CT)-to-x-ray registration of the hip joint, based on fluoroscopic images with large rotation angles. As the ground truth computed with fiducial markers is affected by localization errors in the image datasets, we proposed a new methodology based on uncertainty propagation to estimate the accuracy of a gold standard dataset.

Methods

The gold standard dataset included a 3D CT scan of a female hip phantom and 19 2D fluoroscopic images acquired at different views and voltages. The ground truth transformations were estimated based on the corresponding pairs of extracted 2D and 3D fiducial locations. These were assumed to be corrupted by Gaussian noise, without any restrictions of isotropy. We devised the multiple projective points criterion (MPPC) that jointly optimizes the transformations and the noisy 3D fiducial locations for all views. The accuracy of the transformations obtained with the MPPC was assessed in both synthetic and real experiments using different formulations of the target registration error (TRE), including a novel formulation of the TRE (uTRE) derived from the uncertainty analysis of the MPPC.

Results

The proposed MPPC method was statistically more accurate compared to the validation methods for 2D-3D registration that did not optimize the 3D fiducial positions or wrongly assumed the isotropy of the noise. The reported results were comparable to previous published works of gold standard datasets. However, a formulation of the TRE commonly found in these gold standard datasets was found to significantly miscalculate the true TRE computed in synthetic experiments with known ground truths. In contrast, the uncertainty-based uTRE was statistically closer to the true TRE.

Conclusions

We proposed a new gold standard dataset for the validation of CT-to-X-ray registration of the hip joint. The gold standard transformations were derived from a novel method modeling the uncertainty in extracted 2D and 3D fiducials. Results showed that considering possible noise anisotropy and including corrupted 3D fiducials in the optimization resulted in improved accuracy of the gold standard. A new uncertainty-based formulation of the TRE also appeared as a good alternative to the unknown true TRE that has been replaced in previous works by an alternative TRE not fully reflecting the gold standard accuracy.

SUBMITTER: D'Isidoro F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9290855 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeFluoroscopy is the standard imaging modality used to guide hip surgery and is therefore a natural sensor for computer-assisted navigation. In order to efficiently solve the complex registration problems presented during navigation, human-assisted annotations of the intraoperative image are typically required. This manual initialization interferes with the surgical workflow and diminishes any advantages gained from navigation. In this paper, we propose a method for fully automatic registration using anatomical annotations produced by a neural network.MethodsNeural networks are trained to simultaneously segment anatomy and identify landmarks in fluoroscopy. Training data are obtained using a computationally intensive, intraoperatively incompatible, 2D/3D registration of the pelvis and each femur. Ground truth 2D segmentation labels and anatomical landmark locations are established using projected 3D annotations. Intraoperative registration couples a traditional intensity-based strategy with annotations inferred by the network and requires no human assistance.ResultsGround truth segmentation labels and anatomical landmarks were obtained in 366 fluoroscopic images across 6 cadaveric specimens. In a leave-one-subject-out experiment, networks trained on these data obtained mean dice coefficients for left and right hemipelves, left and right femurs of 0.86, 0.87, 0.90, and 0.84, respectively. The mean 2D landmark localization error was 5.0 mm. The pelvis was registered within [Formula: see text] for 86% of the images when using the proposed intraoperative approach with an average runtime of 7 s. In comparison, an intensity-only approach without manual initialization registered the pelvis to [Formula: see text] in 18% of images.ConclusionsWe have created the first accurately annotated, non-synthetic, dataset of hip fluoroscopy. By using these annotations as training data for neural networks, state-of-the-art performance in fluoroscopic segmentation and landmark localization was achieved. Integrating these annotations allows for a robust, fully automatic, and efficient intraoperative registration during fluoroscopic navigation of the hip.

Project description:PurposeImage-guided navigation and surgical robotics are the next frontiers of minimally invasive surgery. Assuring safety in high-stakes clinical environments is critical for their deployment. 2D/3D registration is an essential, enabling algorithm for most of these systems, as it provides spatial alignment of preoperative data with intraoperative images. While these algorithms have been studied widely, there is a need for verification methods to enable human stakeholders to assess and either approve or reject registration results to ensure safe operation.MethodsTo address the verification problem from the perspective of human perception, we develop novel visualization paradigms and use a sampling method based on approximate posterior distribution to simulate registration offsets. We then conduct a user study with 22 participants to investigate how different visualization paradigms (Neutral, Attention-Guiding, Correspondence-Suggesting) affect human performance in evaluating the simulated 2D/3D registration results using 12 pelvic fluoroscopy images.ResultsAll three visualization paradigms allow users to perform better than random guessing to differentiate between offsets of varying magnitude. The novel paradigms show better performance than the neutral paradigm when using an absolute threshold to differentiate acceptable and unacceptable registrations (highest accuracy: Correspondence-Suggesting (65.1%), highest F1 score: Attention-Guiding (65.7%)), as well as when using a paradigm-specific threshold for the same discrimination (highest accuracy: Attention-Guiding (70.4%), highest F1 score: Corresponding-Suggesting (65.0%)).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that visualization paradigms do affect the human-based assessment of 2D/3D registration errors. However, further exploration is needed to understand this effect better and develop more effective methods to assure accuracy. This research serves as a crucial step toward enhanced surgical autonomy and safety assurance in technology-assisted image-guided surgery.