Dataset Information

Intracranial aneurysm wall enhancement as an indicator of instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background and purpose

Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) of intracranial aneurysms on magnetic resonance imaging has been described in previous studies as a surrogate marker of instability. With this study, an updated literature overview and summary risk estimates of the association between AWE and different specific outcomes (i.e., rupture, growth or symptomatic presentation) for both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are provided.

Methods

The PRISMA guideline was followed and a search was performed of PubMed and Embase to 1 January 2021 for studies that reported on AWE and aneurysm instability. In cross-sectional studies, AWE was compared between patients with stable and unstable aneurysms. In longitudinal studies, AWE of stable aneurysms was assessed at baseline after which patients were followed longitudinally. Risk ratios were calculated for longitudinal studies, prevalence ratios for cross-sectional studies and then the ratios were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis. Also, the performance of AWE to differentiate between stable and unstable aneurysms was evaluated.

Results

Twelve studies were included with a total of 1761 aneurysms. In cross-sectional studies, AWE was positively associated with rupture (prevalence ratio 11.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.05-32.46) and growth or symptomatic presentation (prevalence ratio 4.62, 95% CI 2.85-7.49). Longitudinal studies demonstrated a positive association between AWE and growth or rupture (risk ratio 8.00, 95% CI 2.14-29.88). Assessment of the performance of AWE showed high sensitivities, mixed specificities, low positive predictive values and high negative predictive values.

Conclusions

Although AWE is positively associated with aneurysm instability, current evidence mostly supports the use of its absence as a surrogate marker of aneurysm stability.

SUBMITTER: Molenberg R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9292155 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe safety of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass in the management of anterior circulation intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remains to be determined. This systematic review aims to summarize the existing evidence and provide guidance for the precise management of IAs.Data sourceWe constructed search strategies and comprehensively searched Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane library.MethodsThis systematic review was actualized according to the PRISMA statement. We evaluated study quality using the methodological index for non-randomized study (MINORS). Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the I 2 test. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. The registration number for this systematic review is CRD42023396730.ResultThis systematic review included a total of 21 articles, involving 915 patients. Postoperative bypass patency rate was 99% (95% CI 0.98-1.00); short-term follow-up was 98% (95% CI 0.94-1.00); long-term follow-up was 95% (95% CI 0.93-0.97). The long-term follow-up occlusion rate of saphenous vein was higher than that of radial artery (OR 6.10 95% CI 1.04-35.59). Short-term surgery-related mortality was 0.3% (95% CI 0.000-0.012); long-term follow-up was 0.4% (95% CI 0.000-0.013); The proportion of patients with a score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) during long-term follow-up was 92% (95% CI 0.86-0.98). The incidence rates of long-term follow-up complications were: ischemic 3% (95% CI 0.01-0.06); hemorrhagic 1% (95% CI 0.00-0.03); neurological deficit 1% (95% CI 0.00-0.03); other 3% (95% CI 0.01-0.06).LimitationMost of the included studies were retrospective studies. Studies reporting preoperative status were not sufficient to demonstrate postoperative improvement. Lack of sufficient subgroup information such as aneurysm rupture status.ConclusionEC-IC therapy for anterior circulation IAs has a high safety profile. Higher level of evidence is still needed to support clinical decision.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023396730, identifier: CRD42023396730.

Project description:BackgroundIntracranial aneurysms and intracranial atherosclerosis are prevalent cerebrovascular diseases, and individuals with atherosclerosis have a higher incidence of aneurysms than those without atherosclerosis. However, few studies have conducted combined analyses to investigate the potential association between intracranial aneurysms and intracranial atherosclerosis. This retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between the characteristics of the aneurysm wall and intracranial large arterial plaque using high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI).MethodsHospitalized patients diagnosed with anterior circulation unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), who were diagnosed at Huashan Hospital of Fudan University in Shanghai, China, between March 2016 to February 2018, were consecutively recruited for this study. The patients' pre-treatment HR-VWI images and 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) images were collected. The patients and UIAs were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of plaque in the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Clinical information and aneurysm characteristics were compared between the two groups. Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) and M1 plaque were graded on scales of 0 to 2 on HR-VWI. Based on the gradings, the correlation between AWE and the M1 plaques was analyzed.ResultsA total of 109 patients with 128 saccular UIAs in the anterior circulation were enrolled in the study. Of the patients, there were 56 patients (with 65 UIAs) in the group with M1 plaque and 53 patients (with 63 UIAs) in the group without plaque. There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of both their clinical information (age and hypertension) and aneurysm characteristics (AWE pattern and AWE degree). The grades of the AWE patterns and the AWE degrees of the UIAs were higher in the group with M1 plaque than in the group without plaque. In the M1 plaque group, the grade of M1 plaque was positively correlated with the grade of AWE pattern (correlation coefficient R=0.41, P=0.001) and the grade of AWE degree (correlation coefficient R=0.50, P<0.001).ConclusionsMCA atherosclerosis plaque was associated with the AWE of saccular aneurysms. When evaluating UIAs, attention should also be paid to the large arterial wall, which may assist in assessing the stability of the aneurysm and enable better decision making.

Project description:Background and purposeStent-assisted coiling was initially invented for wide-neck aneurysms, but is now used for smaller berry aneurysms. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficiency of stent-assisted coiling with conventional coiling in treatment of intracranial aneurysms.MethodsA meta-analysis of studies that compared stent-assisted coiling with coiling only was conducted by searching English literatures via Pubmed, Medline and Cochrane Library databases without restricting the publication year. The primary outcomes in this study were immediate occlusion, progressive thrombosis rate, all-complication rate and angiographic recurrence. The secondary outcomes examined were packing density, mortality, permanent complication and thromboembolic complication rate.ResultsTen retrospective cohort studies were included. There is currently only one unfinished randomized study. Although the stent-assisted coiling group tended to show a lower initial occlusion rate than that of the coiling-only group (57.6% versus 68.7%; OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.30-1.44; P = 0.30), it achieved a significantly higher progressive thrombosis rate during follow up compared to that of the coiling only group (37.5% versus 19.4%; OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.95-3.86; P<0.00001) and a significantly lower recurrence rate (16.2% versus 34.4%; OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.25-0.49; P<0.00001). With respect to safety concerns, the all-complication rate (17.6% versus 15.9%; OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.77-1.62; P = 0.56), mortality rate (9.1% versus 2.6%; OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 0.68-7.82; P = 0.18), permanent complication rate (5.6% versus 3.9%; OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.96-2.41; P = 0.08) and thromboembolic complication rate (4.2% versus 4.9%; OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.41-2.38; P = 0.97) did not show significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionsStent-assisted coiling has a lower recurrence rate than conventional coiling. Analysis of complication events did not show any significant difference between the two methods. Despite the findings reported herein, further validation by well-designed prospective studies is needed.