Dataset Information

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for differentiating solid ovarian tumors.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis to differentiate between three types of solid ovarian tumors: granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary, ovarian fibromas, and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs).

Methods

The medical records of 11 patients with GCTs of the ovary (regions of interest [ROI-cs], 137), 61 patients with ovarian fibromas (ROI-cs, 161), and 14 patients with HGSOCs (ROI-cs, 113) confirmed at surgery and histology who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Histogram parameters of ADC maps (ADCmean, ADCmax, ADCmin) were estimated and compared using the Kruskal-WallisH test and Mann-Whitney U test. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curves was used to assess the diagnostic performance of ADC parameters for solid ovarian tumors.

Results

There were significant differences in ADCmean, ADCmax and ADCmin values between GCTs of the ovary, ovarian fibromas, and HGSOCs. The cutoff ADCmean value for differentiating a GCT of the ovary from an ovarian fibroma was 0.95×10^-3 mm²/s, for differentiating a GCT of the ovary from an HGSOC was 0.69×10^-3 mm²/s, and for differentiating an ovarian fibroma from an HGSOC was 1.24×10^-3 mm²/s.

Conclusion

ADCmean derived from ADC histogram analysis provided quantitative information that allowed accurate differentiation of GCTs of the ovary, ovarian fibromas, and HGSOCs before surgery.

SUBMITTER: Liu R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9376384 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for differentiating solid ovarian tumors.

Liu Renwei R Li Ruifeng R Fang Jinzhi J Deng Kan K Chen Cuimei C Li Jianhua J Wu Zhiqing Z Zeng Xiaoxu X

Frontiers in oncology 20220801

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis to differentiate between three types of solid ovarian tumors: granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary, ovarian fibromas, and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs).<h4>Methods</h4>The medical records of 11 patients with GCTs of the ovary (regions of interest [ROI-cs], 137), 61 patients with ovarian fibromas (ROI-cs, 161), and 14 patients with HGSOCs (ROI-cs, 113) confirmed at surgery and ...[more]

PMID: 35978817

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeGlioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma represent the most commonly encountered high-grade-glioma (HGG) in adults. Although both neoplasms are very distinct entities in context of epidemiology, clinical course and prognosis, their appearance in conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is very similar. In search for additional information aiding the distinction of potentially confusable neoplasms, histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps recently proved to be auxiliary in a number of entities. Therefore, our present exploratory retrospective study investigated whether ADC histogram profile parameters differ significantly between anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma, reflect the proliferation index Ki-67, or are associated with the prognostic relevant MGMT (methylguanine-DNA methyl-transferase) promotor methylation status.MethodsPre-surgical ADC volumes of 56 HGG patients were analyzed by histogram-profiling. Association between extracted histogram parameters and neuropathology including WHO-grade, Ki-67 expression and MGMT promotor methylation status was investigated due to comparative and correlative statistics.ResultsGrade IV gliomas were more heterogeneous than grade III tumors. More specifically, ADCmin and the lowest percentile ADCp10 were significantly lower, whereas ADCmax, ADC standard deviation and Skewness were significantly higher in the glioblastoma group. ADCmin, ADCmax, ADC standard deviation, Kurtosis and Entropy of ADC histogram were significantly correlated with Ki-67 expression. No significant difference could be revealed by comparison of ADC histogram parameters between MGMT promotor methylated and unmethylated HGG.ConclusionsADC histogram parameters differ significantly between glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma and show distinct associations with the proliferative activity in both HGG. Our results suggest ADC histogram profiling as promising biomarker for differentiation of both, however, further studies with prospective multicenter design are wanted to confirm and further elaborate this hypothesis.

Project description:ObjectivesWe undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived by diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in the characterization of solid benign and malignant liver lesions, and to assess their value in discriminating these lesions in daily routine practice.MethodsA systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to retrieve studies that used ADC values for differentiating solid benign/dysplastic nodules and malignant liver lesions. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. This meta-analysis was performed on the per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) plot and area under curve (AUC) were created.ResultsA total of 14 original articles were retrieved. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating solid benign from malignant lesions were 78% (67-86%) and 74% (64-81%), respectively. The pooled (95% CI) positive and negative LRs were respectively 3 (2.3-3.8) and 0.3 (0.21-0.43). The DOR (95% CI) was 10 (7-15). The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC plot was 82% (78-85%). Reporting bias was negligible (p value of regression test = 0.36). Mean size of malignant lesions and breathing pattern of MRI were found to be sources of heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity.ConclusionADC measurement independently may not be an optimal diagnostic imaging method for differentiating solid malignant from solid benign hepatic lesions. The meta-analysis showed that ADC measurement had moderate diagnostic accuracy for characterizing solid liver lesions. Further prospective and comparative studies with pre-specified ADC thresholds could be performed to investigate the best MRI protocol and ADC threshold for characterizing solid liver lesions.Advances in knowledgeADC measurement by DW-MRI does not have a good diagnostic performance to differentiate solid malignant from solid benign lesions. Therefore, we suggest not using ADC values in clinical practice to evaluate solid liver lesions.

Dataset Information

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for differentiating solid ovarian tumors.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for differentiating solid ovarian tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets