Efficacy and safety of 3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Current evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological treatment in improving cognitive function is absent. Recent studies have reported that 3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) has a positive effect on improving cognitive impairment; however, its clinical efficacy and safety is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess its efficacy and safety for cognitive impairment.Methods
We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases, and two reviewers independently screened and extracted the data from included studies. We synthesized the data using the Review Manager Software version 5.3.Results
We included six randomized clinical trials (RCTs), encompassing 851 patients with cognitive impairment. The results showed that NBP improved cognitive impairment. Specifically, the clinical efficacy was better than that in the control group, with better performance in improving the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, while decreasing the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus caregiver input scores. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between both groups.Conclusion
The NBP is effective and safe in improving cognitive impairment; however, more high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.
SUBMITTER: Zhou Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9532910 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Efficacy and safety of 3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhou Qiulu Q Han Chao C Xia Yun Y Wan Fang F Yin Sijia S Li Yunna Y Kou Liang L Chi Xiaosa X Hu Junjie J Sun Yadi Y Wu Jiawei J Zou Wenkai W Huang Jinsha J Wang Tao T
CNS neuroscience & therapeutics 20220901 11
<h4>Background</h4>Current evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological treatment in improving cognitive function is absent. Recent studies have reported that 3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) has a positive effect on improving cognitive impairment; however, its clinical efficacy and safety is unclear. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess its efficacy and safety for cognitive impairment.<h4>Methods</h4>We systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopu ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background: Poststroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is a common complication observed after stroke. Current pharmacologic therapies have no definitive evidence for cognitive recovery or disease progression. Recent studies have verified the positive effect of DL-3-n-butylphthalide (NBP). However, the clinical efficacy and safety are still unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of NBP and its harmful effect in the treatment of PSCI. Method: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from inception to June 2021 from seven medical databases and two clinical registries. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used for methodological quality. RevMan v5.4.1 from Cochrane Collaboration was used for statistical analysis, and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) method was used for post hoc testing depend on the number of studies. This study has been submitted to PROSPERO with registration number is CRD42021274123. Result: We identified 26 studies with a total sample size of 2,571 patients. The results of this study showed that NBP as monotherapy or combination therapy had better performance in increasing the MoCA (monotherapy: SMDN = 1.05, 95% CI [0.69, 1.42], p < 0.00001; SMDP = 1.06, 95% CI [0.59, 1.52], p < 0.00001. combination: SMDO = 0.81, 95% CI [0.62, 1.01], p < 0.00001; SMDN = 0.90, 95% CI [0.46, 1.33], p < 0.0001; SMDD = 1.04, 95% CI [0.71, 1.38], p < 0.00001), MMSE (monotherapy: MDN = 4.89, 95% CI [4.14, 5.63]), p < 0.00001). combination: SMDO = 1.26, 95% CI [0.97, 1.56], p < 0.00001; SMDC = 1.63, 95% CI [1.28, 1.98], p < 0.00001; SMDN = 2.13, 95% CI [1.52, 2.75], p < 0.00001) and BI (monotherapy: MDN = 13.53, HKSJ 95% CI [9.84, 17.22], p = 0.014. combination: SMDO = 2.24, HKSJ 95%CI [0.37, 4.11], p = 0.032; SMDC = 3.36, 95%CI [2.80, 3.93], p < 0.00001; SMDD = 1.48, 95%CI [1.13, 1.83], p < 0.00001); and decreasing the NIHSS (monotherapy: MDN = -3.86, 95% CI [-5.22, -2.50], p < 0.00001. combination: SMDO = -1.15, 95% CI [-1.31, -0.98], p < 0.00001; SMDC = -1.82, 95% CI [-2.25, -1.40], p < 0.00001) and CSS (combination: MDO = -7.11, 95% CI [-8.42, -5.80], p < 0.00001), with no serious adverse reactions observed. The funnel plot verified the possibility of publication bias. Conclusion: NBP maintains a stable pattern in promoting the recovery of cognitive function and abilities of daily living, as well as reducing the symptoms of neurological deficits. However, there is still a need for more high-quality RCTs to verify its efficacy and safety.
| S-EPMC8823901 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCognitive enhancers, including cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, are used to treat dementia, but their effectiveness for mild cognitive impairment is unclear. We conducted a systematic review to examine the efficacy and safety of cognitive enhancers for mild cognitive impairment.MethodsOur eligibility criteria were studies of the effects of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine or memantine on mild cognitive impairment reporting cognition, function, behaviour, global status, and mortality or harms. We identified relevant material by searching electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, Embase), the references of included studies, trial registries and conference proceedings, and by contacting experts. Two reviewers independently screened the results of the literature search, abstracted data and appraised risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.ResultsWe screened 15,554 titles and abstracts and 1384 full-text articles. Eight randomized clinical trials and 3 companion reports met our inclusion criteria. We found no significant effects of cognitive enhancers on cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination: 3 randomized clinical trials [RCTs], mean difference [MD] 0.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.22 to 0.50; Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognition subscale: 3 RCTs, standardized MD -0.07, 95% CI-0.16 to 0.01]) or function (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study activities of daily living inventory: 2 RCTs, MD 0.30, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.86). Cognitive enhancers were associated with higher risks of nausea, diarrhea and vomiting than placebo.InterpretationCognitive enhancers did not improve cognition or function among patients with mild cognitive impairment and were associated with a greater risk of gastrointestinal harms. Our findings do not support the use of cognitive enhancers for mild cognitive impairment.
| S-EPMC3826344 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe effectiveness of treatments for mild cognitive impairment is uncertain. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness and harms of treatment for mild cognitive impairment in adults 65 years of age and older.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central (December 2012-December 2014); citations from 2 systematic reviews were considered for inclusion. We included randomized controlled trials involving community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Studies reporting on cognition, function, behaviour, global status, mortality and adverse events for treatment with pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions were included.ResultsSeventeen studies were included. Cholinesterase inhibitor studies evaluating cognition (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognition subscale) showed no difference between intervention and control groups (mean difference [MD] -0.33, 95% CI -0.73 to 0.06]; one behavioural study showed no significant effect on cognition (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale, cognition subscale) for the intervention group when compared to controls (MD -0.60, (95% CI -1.44 to 0.24), and one study on vitamin E showed no difference between intervention and control groups (MD 0.85, 95% CI -0.32 to 2.02). With the Mini-Mental State Examination, cholinesterase inhibitors showed no difference between intervention and control groups (MD 0.17, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.47); behavioural studies showed a significant difference favouring intervention (MD 1.01, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.77), and studies of dietary supplements and/or vitamins showed no difference between intervention and control groups (MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.43). Pharmacologic studies showed no difference in serious adverse events (risk ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.10). No serious adverse events were reported for nonpharmacologic interventions.InterpretationTreatment of mild cognitive impairment with cholinesterase inhibitors showed no benefit when compared with a control group. A small cognitive benefit was observed using behavioural therapies when compared with the control group. However, the clinical significance of this small benefit remains uncertain. The current evidence does not support the use of cholinesterase inhibitors for treating mild cognitive impairment, and future high-quality research using a standardized approach is needed to affirm the finding of a small benefit on cognition that was observed for behavioural interventions.RegistrationPROSPERO no. CRD42014015431.
| S-EPMC4701654 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy of DL-3-n-butylphthalide (NBP) in the treatment of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) has been reported previously. However, the course of treatment that shows curative effect and cytokines predictive of the efficacy of NBP in the treatment of PSCI have not been systematically evaluated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, course of treatment, and cytokines that can predict the effectiveness of NBP in treating poststroke cognitive impairment PSCI.MethodsThis study has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42024518768). Randomized controlled trial (RCT) data dated by November 12, 2023 were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI, CSTJ, and SinoMed databases using medical subject terms combined with free words. The updated Cochrane RoB-I Risk of Bias tool was utilized for literature quality evaluation. Statistical analysis were carried out using Review Manager 5.4.1 software.ResultsThirty-eight original studies involving 5417 PSCI patients were analyzed. The results showed that NBP had a beneficial impact on cognitive function in PSCI patients when used alone or in combination therapy, as assessed by the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale. The effect sizes were significant for both monotherapy and combination therapy. Subgroup analyses based on treatment cycle indicated that NBP enhanced cognitive function in PSCI patients from 1 week after intervention: MMSE (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI [0.28, 0.58], P < 0.001), MoCA (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI [0.27, 0.61], P < 0.001). There was a cumulative enhancement in cognitive function within 6 months after NBP treatment based on the MoCA scores (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI [0.30, 0.91], P < 0.001). Furthermore, decreased levels of the cytokines Hs-CRP, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, Hcy, NSE, MDA, MMP-9, and Cys-C (SMD = -2.28, 95% CI [-2.97, 1.58], P < 0.001) and increased levels of BDNF, VEGF, and TIMP-1 (SMD = 2.80, 95% CI [1.66, 3.94], P < 0.001) were also predictive of treatment efficacy.ConclusionNBP plays a beneficial role in improving cognitive function in PSCI patients, and their prognoses could be predicted by serum cytokine levels. However, high-quality, multicenter, multisample, and RCTs are still needed to confirm the clinical validity of NBP due to its low methodological quality.
| S-EPMC11430564 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are two of the most common neurodegenerative diseases, and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is considered a prodromal stage of clinical AD. Animal studies have shown that probiotics can improve cognitive function and mitigate inflammatory response, however, results from randomized controlled trials in humans are still unclear.ObjectivesA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of probiotic therapy on cognitive function, oxidative stress, and gastrointestinal function in patients with AD, MCI, and PD.MethodsWe searched the electronic databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library until October 2020 for the eligible randomized controlled trials, as well as the unpublished and ongoing trials. Our primary endpoints were cognitive function, inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers, gastrointestinal function, and adverse events.ResultsAfter screening 2,459 titles and abstracts about AD or MCI, we selected 6 eligible studies (n = 499 patients). After screening 1,923 titles and abstracts about PD, we selected 5 eligible studies (n = 342 patients). Compared with the control group, treatment with probiotics improved the cognitive function of patients with AD in the intervention group (P = 0.023). Cognitive function also improved in MCI patients (P = 0.000). Inflammation-related indicators: Malondialdehyde (MDA) was significantly reduced (P = 0.000); and hs-CRP decreased (P = 0.003). Lipid-related indicators: VLDL decreased (P = 0.026); triglyceride decreased (P = 0.009); and insulin resistance level improved: decreased Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (P = 0.019).ConclusionOur analyses suggest that probiotics can improve cognitive and gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with AD, MCI, and PD, which is possibly through reducing inflammatory response and improving lipid metabolism. The safety has also been proven. However, more RCTs with rigorous study design are needed to support our findings.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, Identifier: CRD42021231502.
| S-EPMC8851038 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Vancomycin and teicoplanin are the glycopeptides currently in use for the treatment of infections caused by invasive beta-lactam-resistant gram-positive organisms. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that have compared vancomycin and teicoplanin administered systemically for the treatment of suspected or proven infections. A comprehensive search of trials without year, language, or publication status restrictions was performed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled by using the fixed-effect model (RRs of >1 favor vancomycin). Twenty-four trials were included. All-cause mortality was similar overall (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.21), and there was no significant heterogeneity. In trials that used adequate allocation concealment, the results favored teicoplanin (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.06), while in trials with unknown methods or inadequate concealment, the results favored vancomycin (RR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.27 to 10.30). The latter trials might have recruited more severely ill patients. No other variable affected the RRs for mortality, including the assessment of glycopeptides administered empirically or for proven infections, neutropenia, the participant's age, and drug dosing. There were no significant differences between teicoplanin and vancomycin with regard to clinical failure (RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.05), microbiological failure (RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.65), and other efficacy outcomes. Lower RRs (in favor of teicoplanin) for clinical failure were observed with a lower risk of bias and when treatment was initiated for infections caused by gram-positive organisms rather than empirically. Total adverse events (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.74), nephrotoxicity (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.61), and red man syndrome were significantly less frequent with teicoplanin. Teicoplanin is not inferior to vancomycin with regard to efficacy and is associated with a lower adverse event rate than vancomycin.
| S-EPMC2764163 | biostudies-other
Project description:Background: Acupuncture may be a promising complementary therapy for vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) and has been extensively applied in China. However, its potential effects remain uncertain, and the clinical findings are inconsistent. This review aimed to systematically appraise the overall effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in treating VCI. Methods: To investigate the effects of acupuncture on VCI from inception to February 28, 2021 using randomized clinical trials (RCTs), seven electro-databases [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), VIP, and Wanfang] were searched. Two independent investigators identified the eligible RCTs and extracted data into predesigned forms. The risk of bias (ROB) within each individual trial was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Meta-analyses were conducted for calculating comparative effects in the RevMan software (version 5.3). The strength of attained evidence was rated using the online GRADEpro approach. Results: A total of 48 RCTs involving 3,778 patients with VCI were included. The pooled data demonstrated that acupuncture was more beneficial for a global cognitive function [mean difference (MD) 1.86, 95% CI 1.19-2.54, p < 0.01] and activities of daily living (MD -3.08, 95% CI -4.81 to -1.35, p < 0.01) compared with western medicine (WM). The favorable results were also observed when acupuncture was combined with WM (MD 2.37, 95% CI 1.6-3.14, p < 0.01) or usual care (UC, MD 4.4, 95% CI 1.61-7.19, p = 0.002) in comparison with the corresponding control conditions. Meanwhile, the subgroup analysis did not indicate a statistical effect difference between manual acupuncture (MA) and electroacupuncture (EA) (inter-group I 2 < 50% and p > 0.1) when comparing acupuncture with WM. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) between the acupuncture group and the control group (p > 0.05). Owing to the poor methodological quality and considerable heterogeneity among studies, the certainty of the evidence was low or very low. Conclusions: This review suggests that acupuncture as a monotherapy or an adjuvant therapy may play a positive role in improving the cognition and daily performance of VCI patients associated with few side effects. The difference in styles may not significantly influence its effectiveness. More rigorously designed and preregistered RCTs are highly desirable to verify the therapeutic benefits and determine an optimal acupuncture paradigm. The methodological and reporting quality of future researches should be enhanced by adhering to authoritative standardized statements. Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [No. CRD42017071820].
| S-EPMC8377366 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with high mortality rates. Due to tigecycline has shown excellent in vitro activity against most pathogens, tigecycline is selected as one of the candidate drugs for the treatment of multidrug-resistant organisms infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of tigecycline for the treatment of patients with BSI. The PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched, to identify published studies, and we searched clinical trial registries to identify completed unpublished studies, the results of which were obtained through the manufacturer. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the rate of clinical cure and microbiological success. 24 controlled studies were included in this systematic review. All-cause mortality was lower with tigecycline than with control antibiotic agents, but the difference was not significant (OR 0.85, [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-2.33; P = 0.745]). Clinical cure was significantly higher with tigecycline groups (OR 1.76, [95% CI 1.26-2.45; P = 0.001]). Eradication efficiency did not differ between tigecycline and control regimens, but the sample size for these comparisons was small. Subgroup analyses showed good clinical cure result in bacteremia patients with CAP. Tigecycline monotherapy was associated with a OR of 2.73 (95% CI 1.53-4.87) for mortality compared with tigecycline combination therapy (6 studies; 250 patients), without heterogeneity. Five studies reporting on 398 patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae BSI showed significantly lower mortality in the tigecycline arm than in the control arm. The combined treatment with tigecycline may be considered the optimal option for severely ill patients with BSI.
| S-EPMC5382384 | biostudies-other
Project description:ObjectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combination scalp acupuncture in treating post-stroke cognitive impairment.MethodsA comprehensive search was conducted across eight databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, Embase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP, targeting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from the inception of these databases until October 24, 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on RCTs that compared scalp acupuncture with conventional treatments as therapeutic interventions for patients suffering from post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). The effectiveness of these treatments was evaluated using various outcome measures, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA), as well as P300 latency and amplitude, which collectively assess cognitive function. Two independent reviewers conducted a risk of bias (ROB2) assessment, and data analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.ResultsThis analysis included a total of 28 studies involving 1,995 patients. However, according to the standards of the ROB2 tool, most of these studies exhibited various methodological issues. The comprehensive analysis indicates that the efficacy of combined scalp acupuncture in treating post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is superior to that of single treatments, as evidenced by improvements across multiple scales, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA), P300 latency, and amplitude. Specifically, the overall effective rate was reported as (RR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14-1.45, p < 0.0001; I 2 = 51%, random effects model). The mean differences for the various scales were as follows: MoCA (MD = 3.55, 95% CI: 2.68-4.41, I 2 = 93%, random effects model), MMSE (MD = 3.78, 95% CI: 2.83-4.73, I 2 = 94%, random effects model), LOTCA (MD = 9.70, 95% CI: 7.72-11.69, I 2 = 57%, random effects model), P300 latency (MD = -21.83, 95% CI: -26.31 to -17.35, I 2 = 55%, random effects model), and amplitude (MD = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.76-1.34, I 2 = 0%, fixed effects model), demonstrating low, medium, and high levels of heterogeneity, respectively. Notably, one study reported an adverse event related to participant withdrawal during the study.ConclusionCombination scalp acupuncture exhibits superior efficacy compared to single-treatment modalities in patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI). However, the higher risk of bias (ROB) in the included trials suggests that the quality of evidence about these assessment results may be compromised. Therefore, there is an urgent need for additional high-quality clinical trials to further validate the efficacy and effectiveness of combined scalp acupuncture in treating PSCI, ultimately enhancing the overall level of evidence.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024519200.
| S-EPMC11638195 | biostudies-literature
Project description:As the life expectancy of elderly people has drastically increased, the incidence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in this population has proportionally grown. Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) refers to all forms of cognitive disorder associated with cerebrovascular disease. Homocysteine has recently been recognized as a contributor to the pathomechanisms involved in cognitive impairment. B vitamins, such as folic acid, are known to be effective in lowering homocysteine levels. To evaluate the efficacy of folic acid in patients with VCI. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of research on folic acid treatments for VCI. Only randomized controlled trials studies that compared the efficacy of folic acid to placebo or other interventions were considered, irrespective of publication status, year of publication, and languages. Two independent reviewers searched the Medline via Ovid, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) journal databases up to July 2021 and independently appraised the included studies. We used mean difference outcome with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to calculate the change of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), cognitive function domain, and concentration of homocysteine. We found three studies comparing folic acid with placebo and one study comparing folic acid with other interventions. There is only slight evidence that the MMSE score in patients who received Folic Acid increased 0.3 point higher compared to the placebo group after 24 months (95% CI:-0.12-0.37; p=0.31). There is very strong evidence that the concentration of Homocysteine in the Folic Acid group became 6.16 μmol/L lower compared to the placebo group after 6 months (95% CI:2.32-8.21 lower; p<0.001). Our review shows the effectiveness of folic acid in lowering plasma homocysteine concentration after 6 months period compared to placebo. However, this effect is not accompanied by improvement in cognitive function.
| S-EPMC8832227 | biostudies-literature