Donor lung preservation for transplantation-where do we go from here?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Van Raemdonck D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9562521 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Donor lung preservation for transplantation-where do we go from here?
Van Raemdonck Dirk D Van Slambrouck Jan J Ceulemans Laurens J LJ
Journal of thoracic disease 20220901 9
Similar Datasets
Project description:Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease that accounts for approximately 14% of all lung cancers. In the United States, approximately 31,000 patients are diagnosed annually with SCLC. Despite numerous clinical trials, including at least 40 phase 3 trials since the 1970s, systemic treatment for patients with SCLC has not changed significantly in the past several decades. Consequently, the 5-year survival rate remains low at <7% overall, and most patients survive for only 1 year or less after diagnosis. Unlike nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in which major advances have been made using targeted therapies, there are still no approved targeted drugs for SCLC. Significant barriers to progress in SCLC include 1) a lack of early detection modalities, 2) limited tumor tissue for translational research (eg, molecular profiling of DNA, RNA, and/or protein alterations) because of small diagnostic biopsies and the rare use of surgical resection in standard treatment, and 3) rapid disease progression with poor understanding of the mechanisms contributing to therapeutic resistance. In this report, the authors review the current state of SCLC treatment, recent advances in current understanding of the underlying disease biology, and opportunities to advance translational research and therapeutic approaches for patients with SCLC.
| S-EPMC5497465 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) has become an important life-saving option for patients with severe respiratory disorders, since it was developed by a group in the University of Southern California in 1993 and introduced in Japan in 1998 in order to address the current severe shortage of brain-dead donor organs. Although LDLLT candidates were basically limited to critically ill patients who would require hospitalization, the long-term use of steroids, and/or mechanical respiratory support prior to transplantation, LDLLT provided good post-transplant outcomes, comparable to brain-dead donor lung transplantation in the early and late phases. In Kyoto University, the 5- and 10-year survival rates after LDLLT were reported to be 79.0% and 64.6%, respectively. LDLLT should be performed under appropriate circumstances, considering the inherent risk to the living donor. In our transplant program, all living donors returned to their previous social lives without any major complications, and living-donor surgery was associated with a morbidity rate of <15%. Both functional and anatomical size matching were preoperatively performed between the living-donor lobar grafts and recipients. Precise size matching before surgery could provide a favorable pulmonary function and exercise capacity after LDLLT. Various transplant procedures have recently been developed in LDLLT in order to deal with the issue of graft size mismatching in recipients, and favorable post-transplant outcomes have been observed. Native upper lobe-sparing and/or right-to-left inverted transplantation have been performed for undersized grafts, while single-lobe transplantation has been employed with or without contralateral pneumonectomy and/or delayed chest closure for oversized grafts.
| S-EPMC8662478 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe set a model of brain death, donor management, and lung transplantation for studies on lung preservation and reconditioning before transplantation.MethodsTen pigs (39.7?±?5.9 Kg) were investigated. Five animals underwent brain death and were treated as organ donors; the lungs were then procured and cold stored (Ischemia). Five recipients underwent left lung transplantation and post-reperfusion follow-up (Graft). Cardiorespiratory and metabolic parameters were collected. Lung gene expression of cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF?), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1?), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon gamma (IFN?), high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1)), chemokines (chemokine CC motif ligand-2 (CCL2-MCP-1), chemokine CXC motif ligand-10 (CXCL-10), interleukin-8 (IL-8)), and endothelial activation markers (endothelin-1 (EDN-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), selectin-E (SELE)) was assessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).ResultsTachycardia and hypertension occurred during brain death induction; cardiac output rose, systemic vascular resistance dropped (P?<?0.05), and diabetes insipidus occurred. Lung-protective ventilation strategy was applied: 9 h after brain death induction, PaO2 was 192?±?12 mmHg at positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 8.0?±?1.8 cmH2O and FiO2 of 40%; wet-to-dry ratio (W/D) was 5.8?±?0.5, and extravascular lung water (EVLW) was 359?±?80 mL. Procured lungs were cold-stored for 471?±?24 min (Ischemia) at the end of which W/D was 6.1?±?0.9. Left lungs were transplanted and reperfused (warm ischemia 98?±?14 min). Six hours after controlled reperfusion, PaO2 was 192?±?23 mmHg (PEEP 8.7?±?1.5 cmH2O, FiO2 40%), W/D was 5.6?±?0.4, and EVLW was 366?±?117 mL. Levels of IL-8 rose at the end of donor management (BD, P?<?0.05); CCL2-MCP-1, IL-8, HMGB-1, and SELE were significantly altered after reperfusion (Graft, P?<?0.05).ConclusionsWe have set a standardized, reproducible pig model resembling the entire process of organ donation that may be used as a platform to test in vivo and ex vivo strategies of donor lung optimization before transplantation.
| S-EPMC4513016 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC4264300 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated that low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening could reduce lung cancer mortality by 20% in high-risk individuals. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approved lung cancer screening. The NLST, USPSTF and CMS define high risk as smoking ?30 pack-years, smoking within the past 15 years, and being ages 55-74, 55-80 or 55-77. Retrospective studies demonstrated selection using model-estimated risk is superior to NLST-like criteria: higher sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV), more deaths averted and higher cost-effectiveness. Projects are underway that may additionally support use of risk to determine eligibility. Firstly, the International Lung Screen Trial (ILST) is prospectively enrolling 4,000 individuals for screening if individuals have PLCOm2012 model risk ?1.5% or are USPSTF+ve. Six-year follow-up will allow comparisons. Interim results support the risk approach. Secondly, Cancer Care Ontario started the Lung Cancer Screening Pilot for People at High Risk in order to find optimal design for province-wide programmatic screening. They are enrolling 3,000 individuals to screening based on PLCOm2012 risk ?2%. Some hesitation to recommend screening selection based on model risk comes from the observation that selected individuals are older, have more comorbidities, are expected to have fewer life years and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and are more likely to die from competing causes. We show that 25.6% of NLST eligible smokers are at low risk (6-year lung cancer incidence proportion =0.008). This group will not benefit from screening but has lower age, fewer comorbidities and fewer competing causes of death. When they are excluded from the NLST+ve group, age, comorbidity count and competing causes of death are similar to those in the PLCOm2012+ve group. In some jurisdictions, model-based lung cancer screening selection needs to take into consideration the elevated risk in blacks and indigenous peoples.
| S-EPMC6037970 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6419919 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We examine the single nuclear RNA profile in the human donor heart at baseline and 10 hours of storage in HTK with/without canrenone. We also analyze the genomic occupancy of MR in these conditions.
2025-04-03 | GSE261124 | GEO
Project description:Since publication of the first randomized controlled trial describing rapid antidepressant effects of ketamine, several reports have confirmed the potential utility of this dissociative anesthetic medication for treatment of major depressive episodes, including those associated with bipolar disorder and resistant to other medications and electroconvulsive therapy. These reports have generated several questions with respect to who might respond to ketamine, how, and for how long. To start answering these questions. We used PubMed.gov and ClinicalTrials.gov to perform a systematic review of all available published data on the antidepressant effects of ketamine and of all recently completed, ongoing, and planned studies. To date, 163 patients, primarily with treatment-resistant depression, have participated in case studies, open-label investigations, or controlled trials. All controlled trials have used a within-subject, crossover design with an inactive placebo as the control. Ketamine administration has usually involved an anaesthesiologist infusing a single, subanesthetic, intravenous dose, and required hospitalization for at least 24 hours postinfusion. Response rates in the open-label investigations and controlled trials have ranged from 25% to 85% at 24 hours postinfusion and from 14% to 70% at 72 hours postinfusion. Although adverse effects have generally been mild, some patients have experienced brief changes in blood pressure, heart rate, or respiratory rate. Risk-benefit analyses support further research of ketamine for individuals with severe mood disorders. However, given the paucity of randomized controlled trials, lack of an active placebo, limited data on long-term outcomes, and potential risks, ketamine administration is not recommended outside of the hospital setting.
| S-EPMC3438349 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), tools to assess patient self-report of health status, are now increasingly used in research, care and policymaking. While there are two well-developed disease-specific PROMs for interstitial lung diseases (ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), many unmet and urgent needs remain. In December 2019, 64 international ILD experts convened in Erice, Italy to deliberate on many topics, including PROMs in ILD. This review summarises the history of PROMs in ILD, shortcomings of the existing tools, challenges of development, validation and implementation of their use in clinical trials, and the discussion held during the meeting. Development of disease-specific PROMs for ILD including IPF with robust methodology and validation in concordance with guidance from regulatory authorities have increased user confidence in PROMs. Minimal clinically important difference for bidirectional changes may need to be developed. Cross-cultural validation and linguistic adaptations are necessary in addition to robust psychometric properties for effective PROM use in multinational clinical trials. PROM burden of use should be reduced through appropriate use of digital technologies and computerised adaptive testing. Active patient engagement in all stages from development, testing, choosing and implementation of PROMs can help improve probability of success and further growth.
| S-EPMC9488962 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Patients with psoriasis often have comorbidities and are at increased risk of developing several complications compared with the general population. Knowledge on the role of immune mediators and systemic inflammation in psoriasis has led to the hypothesis that early intervention with systemic therapy has the potential to modify the course of the disease and reduce the risk of long-term adverse outcomes. In this article, we address some potential issues that need to be considered before early intervention can be implemented routinely. The first is determining what constitutes "early" intervention for psoriasis. A second point is whether the intervention should be considered for patients with early disease or for selected subsets based on risk stratification. A third important consideration is defining success for early intervention. Finally, adoption of early and effective intervention should be based on high-level evidence. Ideally, randomized trials would be the best strategy to compare early vs. late systemic treatment in patients with psoriasis, probably using the frequency of long-term outcomes as primary endpoint, with cutaneous and pharmacoeconomic outcomes assessed secondarily.
| S-EPMC9751903 | biostudies-literature