Dataset Information

A comparison of face-to-face endotracheal intubation and standard intubation using Airtraq video laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients: A randomized controlled trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Routine endotracheal intubation requires a patient in supine position with an operator standing behind the patient's head. In case of a morbidly obese patient positioned in the recommended semi-recumbent position, an alternative method can be considered. Face-to-face intubation can be used both in patients in sitting as well as in prone position and when there is difficult access to the head. Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of face-to-face intubation in morbidly obese adult patients with body mass index over 40 kg m-2.

Methods

The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee and written informed consent from patients was obtained. We conducted a parallel randomized controlled trial with patients scheduled for elective sleeve gastrectomy. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials with a number NCT04959149. Randomization and allocation to trial groups were carried out using the envelope method. The primary outcomes were the time of intubation and the first pass success of endotracheal intubation.

Results

76 patients (routine intubation n = 36, face-to-face intubation n = 40) were included in the study with no dropouts. The intubation success rates were 82.5% versus 100%, mean intubation time was 17.1 ± 18 seconds versus 29 ± 11 seconds and the need for additional maneuvers (backward, upward, rightward pressure or flexing the neck) was 15% versus 19.5%, in face-to-face and routine intubation, respectively. No injuries to teeth or mucosa have been reported. There were no incidents of desaturation below 92% or other complications associated with intubation.

Conclusion

Face-to-face intubation is shorter than the routine intubation in obese patients. This method may be an alternative to standard intubation in case of airway management in morbidly obese patients in semi-erect position; however, it requires both training and practice.

SUBMITTER: Nowak-Tim J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9726369 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparison of face-to-face endotracheal intubation and standard intubation using Airtraq video laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Nowak-Tim Justyna J Gaszynski Tomasz T Ratajczyk Pawel P

Medicine 20221201 48

<h4>Background</h4>Routine endotracheal intubation requires a patient in supine position with an operator standing behind the patient's head. In case of a morbidly obese patient positioned in the recommended semi-recumbent position, an alternative method can be considered. Face-to-face intubation can be used both in patients in sitting as well as in prone position and when there is difficult access to the head. Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of face-to-face intubation in morbidly obese a ...[more]

PMID: 36482652

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:During an emergency endotracheal intubation, rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) with cricoid pressure (CP) is frequently implemented to prevent aspiration pneumonia. We evaluated the CVS in endotracheal intubation in RSII with CP, in comparison with a direct laryngoscope (DL). METHODS:One hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the CVS as a video stylet (CVS-V) group, the CVS as a lightwand (CVS-L) group and DL group. Primary outcomes were to assess the power of the CVS, compared with DL, regarding the first attempt success rate and intubation time in simulated RSII with CP. Secondary outcomes were to examine hemodynamic stress response and the incidence of complications. RESULTS:The first attempt success rates within 30 s and within 60 s were higher in CVS-V and DL group than those in CVS-L group (p = 0.006 and 0.037, respectively). The intergroup difference for intubation success rate within 30 s was nonsignificant and almost all the patients were successfully intubated within 60 s (98% for CVS-L and DL group, 96% for CVS-L group). Kaplan-Meier estimator demonstrated the median intubation time was 10.6 s [95% CI, 7.5 to 13.7] in CVS-V group, 14.6 s [95% CI, 11.1 to 18.0] in CVS-L group and 16.5 s [95% CI, 15.7 to 17.3] in DL group (p = 0.023 by the log-rank test). However, the difference was nonsignificant after Sidak's adjustment. The intergroup differences for hemodynamic stress response, sore throat and mucosa injury incidence were also nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS:The CVS-D and DL provide a higher first attempt intubation success rate within 30 and 60 s in intubation with CP; the intubation time for the CVS-V was nonsignificantly shorter than that for the other two intubation methods. Almost all the patients can be successfully intubated with any of the three intubation methods within 60 s. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03841890 , registered on February 15, 2019 (retrospectively registered).

Project description:UnlabelledThe aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the TruView video laryngoscope (TruView) facilitates pediatric endotracheal intubation (ETI) more quickly and safely than conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (MAC) in three manikin-based airway scenarios. This was a randomized crossover manikin study including 120 novice paramedics. The participants performed tracheal intubations using both TruView and MAC on a pediatric manikin in a control scenario (A), chest compression scenario (B), and chest compression cervical stabilization scenario (C). The sequence of scenarios was randomized. The primary outcome was time to intubation. Secondary outcomes were overall success rates, incidence of dental trauma, and ease of intubation. All intubation attempts were assessed by a trained assistant. The overall success rate was significantly higher with the TruView compared than the MAC in scenario B (100 vs. 81.7 %; p = 0.011) and scenario C (100 vs. 68.3 %; p < 0.001). The intubation time was significantly lower with the TruView than the MAC (18.5 vs. 24.3 s, p = 0.017, for scenario A; 21.6 vs. 25.7 s, p = 0.023, for scenario B; and 28.9 vs. 45.4 s, p < 0.001, for scenario C). Glottic view quality was better with TruView than the MAC in all scenarios, p < 0.001.ConclusionsThe TruView offers better intubation conditions than the MAC on a pediatric manikin in the control scenario, chest compression scenario, and chest compression scenario with cervical stabilization scenario. The TruView may be used to elevate the epiglottis for orotracheal intubation. Further clinical studies are necessary to confirm these initial positive findings.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02289872.What is known•Prehospital pediatric intubation using a standard laryngoscope is varied and ranges from 63.4 to 82 %. What is New: •This is the first study showing efficiency of pediatric endotracheal intubation using the TruView PCD by paramedics in tree simulation scenarios. •TruView PCD offers better pediatric intubation conditions than the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Dataset Information

A comparison of face-to-face endotracheal intubation and standard intubation using Airtraq video laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

A comparison of face-to-face endotracheal intubation and standard intubation using Airtraq video laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets