Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Hybrid resection of GI stromal tumor with endoscopic submucosal dissection and the full-thickness resection device.

ABSTRACT: Video 1Hybrid resection of gastric GI stromal tumor with endoscopic submucosal dissection and the Full-Thickness Resection Device.

SUBMITTER: Angajala V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9832239 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

Hybrid resection of GI stromal tumor with endoscopic submucosal dissection and the full-thickness resection device.

Angajala Varun V Yung Evan E Buxbaum James J Sahakian Ara A

VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 20221017 1

Video 1Hybrid resection of gastric GI stromal tumor with endoscopic submucosal dissection and the Full-Thickness Resection Device. ...[more]

PMID: 36644241

Similar Datasets

Endoscopic resection of GI stromal tumor using full-thickness resection device: tips and tricks

Project description:Video Video 1 R0 endoscopic resection of gastric GI stromal tumor using a dedicated gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device.

| S-EPMC9832269 | biostudies-literature

Hybrid resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection and full-thickness resection device of a large cecal laterally spreading tumor involving the appendix.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7426618 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a gastric GI stromal tumor.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6408927 | biostudies-literature

Laparoscopy-assisted nonexposed endoscopic full-thickness resection for local resection after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description:Video 1Nonexposed endoscopic wall inversion surgery for local resection of microscopic residual tumor after endoscopic submucosal dissection.

| S-EPMC11009435 | biostudies-literature

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic full-thickness resection for management of a rare case of esophageal GI stromal tumor

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10927991 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of a stomach gastrointestinal stromal tumor using a dedicated full-thickness resection device.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC7570444 | biostudies-literature

ASGE guideline for endoscopic full-thickness resection and submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection.

Project description:With the development of reliable endoscopic closure techniques and tools, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is emerging as a therapeutic option for the treatment of subepithelial tumors and epithelial neoplasia with significant fibrosis. EFTR may be categorized as "exposed" and "nonexposed." In exposed EFTR, the full-thickness resection is undertaken with a tunneled or nontunneled technique, with subsequent closure of the defect. In nonexposed EFTR, a secure serosa-to-serosa apposition is achieved before full-thickness resection of the isolated lesion. This document reviews current techniques and devices used for EFTR and reviews clinical applications and outcomes.

| S-EPMC6669323 | biostudies-literature

Adaptation of endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques for endoscopic full-thickness resection: a review of key steps and technical aspects.

Project description:Background and aimsGI stromal tumors (GISTs) represent the most common mesenchymal tumors of the GI tract. Guidelines recommend the removal of histologically proven gastric GISTs >2 cm. While the conventional treatment of a gastric GIST involves surgical excision, endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been described as an acceptable alternative. We aim to outline how the key steps used in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be adapted to the performance of exposed EFTR and discuss the variations in technical aspects between the 2 procedures.MethodsWe use a video case illustration with a comprehensive narrative to highlight the similarities and differences in equipment used and techniques in EFTR and ESD. Images and graphical illustrations are also used to describe these techniques.ResultsESD techniques and equipment can be adapted for use in EFTR of gastric GISTs. Principles such as deep mucosal incision, the appropriate use of traction, and identification of vessels for prophylactic coagulation help to ensure a safe and efficient procedure. The main difference in EFTR is the need for general anesthesia, starting the mucosal incision as close to the tumor margin as possible, submucosal dissection around the surface of the tumor capsule, and a strong closure method for the muscle defect.ConclusionsThe equipment and techniques in ESD can be adapted to EFTR for gastric GISTs by endoscopists who are familiar with ESD techniques.

| S-EPMC10861806 | biostudies-literature

A case of endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the submucosal tunnel.

Project description:The patient was a 49-year-old female with a submucosal tumor (12×12 mm) located in the lesser curvature side of the stomach. The diagnosis by endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration was of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound showed gastrointestinal stromal tumor with an intra-luminal growth type. Endoscopic full-thickness resection was then performed. To achieve good counter traction, enough safety margin, and minimal defect of muscle, full-thickness resection via creating a submucosal tunnel was performed as a new technique. The final histological diagnosis was gastrointestinal stromal tumor with R0 resection.

| S-EPMC10461039 | biostudies-literature

Factors associated with endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric submucosal tumors.

Project description:To identify factors that impact the procedure and treatment outcomes for endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs).Medical records were collected for all patients with gastric SMTs who underwent EFTR procedures in Shengjing Hospital between June 2012 and April 2014. The data from each patient were reviewed, including gender, age, maximum tumor size on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), tumor location in stomach, length of EFTR procedure, pneumoperitoneum during EFTR, cost to close defects, length of hospital stay after the procedure, and procedure-related complications.Endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric SMTs was successfully performed in all 41 patients. Maximum size on EUS [parameter estimate (PE) = 4.443, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.191-6.695; p = 0.000] and tumor location in the greater curvature (PE = 44.441, 95% CI 5.539-83.343; p = 0.026) were significantly associated with the length of the procedure. A pneumoperitoneum was more likely to occur during EFTR in tumors with a larger EUS size [odds ratio (OR) = 1.415, 95% CI 1.034-1.936; p = 0.03], and less likely to occur during EFTR for tumors located in the posterior wall (OR = 0.003, 95% CI 0-0.351; p = 0.017). The use of the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system was significantly associated with shorter hospital stays (PE = -1.006, 95% CI -1.998 to -0.014; p = 0.047) and a higher cost of closing defects (PE = 854.742, 95% CI 358.377-1351.107; p = 0.001).Endoscopic full-thickness resection is an effective and safe method for removing gastric SMTs. Tumor size on EUS and location of the tumor were associated with the duration of EFTR and the occurrence of a pneumoperitoneum during the procedure. The use of an OTSC system was significantly associated with shorter hospital stays and a higher cost of closing defects.

| S-EPMC4648854 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data