Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Dynamic pressure-volume loop analysis by simultaneous real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance and left heart catheterization.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Left ventricular (LV) contractility and compliance are derived from pressure-volume (PV) loops during dynamic preload reduction, but reliable simultaneous measurements of pressure and volume are challenging with current technologies. We have developed a method to quantify contractility and compliance from PV loops during a dynamic preload reduction using simultaneous measurements of volume from real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and invasive LV pressures with CMR-specific signal conditioning.

Methods

Dynamic PV loops were derived in 16 swine (n = 7 naïve, n = 6 with aortic banding to increase afterload, n = 3 with ischemic cardiomyopathy) while occluding the inferior vena cava (IVC). Occlusion was performed simultaneously with the acquisition of dynamic LV volume from long-axis real-time CMR at 0.55 T, and recordings of invasive LV and aortic pressures, electrocardiogram, and CMR gradient waveforms. PV loops were derived by synchronizing pressure and volume measurements. Linear regression of end-systolic- and end-diastolic- pressure-volume relationships enabled calculation of contractility. PV loops measurements in the CMR environment were compared to conductance PV loop catheter measurements in 5 animals. Long-axis 2D LV volumes were validated with short-axis-stack images.

Results

Simultaneous PV acquisition during IVC-occlusion was feasible. The cardiomyopathy model measured lower contractility (0.2 ± 0.1 mmHg/ml vs 0.6 ± 0.2 mmHg/ml) and increased compliance (12.0 ± 2.1 ml/mmHg vs 4.9 ± 1.1 ml/mmHg) compared to naïve animals. The pressure gradient across the aortic band was not clinically significant (10 ± 6 mmHg). Correspondingly, no differences were found between the naïve and banded pigs. Long-axis and short-axis LV volumes agreed well (difference 8.2 ± 14.5 ml at end-diastole, -2.8 ± 6.5 ml at end-systole). Agreement in contractility and compliance derived from conductance PV loop catheters and in the CMR environment was modest (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.56 and 0.44, respectively).

Conclusions

Dynamic PV loops during a real-time CMR-guided preload reduction can be used to derive quantitative metrics of contractility and compliance, and provided more reliable volumetric measurements than conductance PV loop catheters.

SUBMITTER: Seemann F 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9841727 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Dynamic pressure-volume loop analysis by simultaneous real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance and left heart catheterization.

Seemann Felicia F   Bruce Christopher G CG   Khan Jaffar M JM   Ramasawmy Rajiv R   Potersnak Amanda G AG   Herzka Daniel A DA   Kakareka John W JW   Jaimes Andrea E AE   Schenke William H WH   O'Brien Kendall J KJ   Lederman Robert J RJ   Campbell-Washburn Adrienne E AE  

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 20230116 1


<h4>Background</h4>Left ventricular (LV) contractility and compliance are derived from pressure-volume (PV) loops during dynamic preload reduction, but reliable simultaneous measurements of pressure and volume are challenging with current technologies. We have developed a method to quantify contractility and compliance from PV loops during a dynamic preload reduction using simultaneous measurements of volume from real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and invasive LV pressures with CM  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10315326 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3077315 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9259376 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6934650 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3935312 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8649518 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8549254 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9637172 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9161533 | biostudies-literature