Dataset Information

A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Optimal intraoperative fluid management guided by central venous pressure (CVP), a traditional intravascular volume status indicator, has improved transplanted graft function during kidney transplantation (KT). Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) - dynamic preload indexes - are robust predictors of fluid responsiveness. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of PPV and CVP against SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness in terms of cost-effectiveness after a standardised empiric volume challenge in KT patients.

Methods

36 patients undergoing living-donor KT were analysed. PPV, SVV, CVP and cardiac index (CI) were measured before and after fluid loading with a hydroxyethyl starch solution (7 mL/kg of ideal body weight). Patients were classified as responders (n = 12) or non-responders (n = 24) to fluid loading when CI increases were ≥10% or <10%, respectively. The ability of PPV, SVV and CVP to predict fluid responsiveness was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

SVV and CVP measured before fluid loading were correlated with changes in CI caused by fluid expansion (ρ = 0.33, P = 0.049 and ρ = -0.37, P = 0.026) in contrast to PPV (ρ = 0.14, P = 0.429). The ROC analysis showed that SVV and CVP predicted response to volume loading (area under the ROC curve = 0.781 and 0.727, respectively; P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Under the conditions of our study, SVV and CVP exhibited similar performance in predicting fluid responsiveness and could inform fluid management during KT as compared with PPV.

SUBMITTER: Kim KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9875873 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Kim Kyung Mi KM Kim Gaab Soo GS Han Minsoo M

Singapore medical journal 20211215 12

<h4>Introduction</h4>Optimal intraoperative fluid management guided by central venous pressure (CVP), a traditional intravascular volume status indicator, has improved transplanted graft function during kidney transplantation (KT). Pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) - dynamic preload indexes - are robust predictors of fluid responsiveness. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of PPV and CVP against SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness in terms of cost-effectiv ...[more]

PMID: 34911180

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceManeuvers assessing fluid responsiveness before an intravascular volume expansion may limit useless fluid administration, which in turn may improve outcomes.ObjectiveTo describe maneuvers for assessing fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients.RegistrationThe protocol was registered at PROSPERO: CRD42019146781.Information sources and searchPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were search from inception to 08/08/2023.Study selection and data collectionProspective and intervention studies were selected.Statistical analysisData for each maneuver were reported individually and data from the five most employed maneuvers were aggregated. A traditional and a Bayesian meta-analysis approach were performed.ResultsA total of 69 studies, encompassing 3185 fluid challenges and 2711 patients were analyzed. The prevalence of fluid responsiveness was 49.9%. Pulse pressure variation (PPV) was studied in 40 studies, mean threshold with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) = 11.5 (10.5-12.4)%, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) with 95% CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.90). Stroke volume variation (SVV) was studied in 24 studies, mean threshold with 95% CI = 12.1 (10.9-13.3)%, and AUC with 95% CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.91). The plethysmographic variability index (PVI) was studied in 17 studies, mean threshold = 13.8 (12.3-15.3)%, and AUC was 0.88 (0.82-0.94). Central venous pressure (CVP) was studied in 12 studies, mean threshold with 95% CI = 9.0 (7.7-10.1) mmHg, and AUC with 95% CI was 0.77 (0.69-0.87). Inferior vena cava variation (∆IVC) was studied in 8 studies, mean threshold = 15.4 (13.3-17.6)%, and AUC with 95% CI was 0.83 (0.78-0.89).ConclusionsFluid responsiveness can be reliably assessed in adult patients under mechanical ventilation. Among the five maneuvers compared in predicting fluid responsiveness, PPV, SVV, and PVI were superior to CVP and ∆IVC. However, there is no data supporting any of the above mentioned as being the best maneuver. Additionally, other well-established tests, such as the passive leg raising test, end-expiratory occlusion test, and tidal volume challenge, are also reliable.

Project description:BackgroundStroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) are based on the interaction between the heart and lungs during mechanical ventilation. However, debate continues as to whether SVV and PPV can accurately predict fluid responsiveness during the one-lung ventilation (OLV). We therefore undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that investigated the diagnostic value of SVV and PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness undergoing OLV during thoracic surgery.MethodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE, WANFANG, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched for studies on the use of SVV and/or PPV in patients undergoing OLV from 2010 to 2021. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The funnel diagram analysis was used to test publication bias. A fixed-effects model was used to calculate the pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the relevant 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were estimated, and the areas under the SROC curve were calculated.ResultsIn total nine studies, comprising 452 patients were ultimately included in this meta-analysis, including 217 (48%) responders and 235 (52%) nonresponders. After combining the correlation coefficients, a slight heterogeneity was found between SVV and PPV in these selected studies (I2 SVV =19.7%, I2 PPV =15.3%), and the funnel diagram also showed that the P values of SVV and PPV were 0.33 and 0.26. After the pooled analysis, the respective sensitivity of SVV and PPV in predicting fluid responsiveness was 0.66 and 0.61, the specificity was 0.62 and 0.53, the positive likelihood ratios were 1.7 and 1.3, the negative likelihood ratios were 0.55 and 0.74, and the DORs were 3 and 2. The areas under the SROC curve of SVV and PPV were 0.68 and 0.60, respectively, according to STATA SE16 software, and the combined areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of SVV and PPV were 0.681 and 0.604, respectively, according to MedCalc19.0.4 software.ConclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that SVV and PPV are not suitable for guiding intraoperative fluid therapy due to their poor ability to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing OLV, and we need a better indicator instead.

Project description:BackgroundThe optimal perioperative fluid resuscitation strategy for liver resections remains undefined. Goal-directed therapy (GDT) embodies a number of physiologic strategies to achieve an ideal fluid balance and avoid the consequences of over- or under-resuscitation.Study designIn a prospective randomized trial, patients undergoing liver resection were randomized to GDT using stroke volume variation as an end point or to standard perioperative resuscitation. Primary outcomes measure was 30-day morbidity.ResultsBetween 2012 and 2014, one hundred and thirty-five patients were randomized (GDT: n = 69; standard perioperative resuscitation: n = 66). Median age was 57 years and 56% were male. Metastatic disease comprised 81% of patients. Overall (35% GDT vs 36% standard perioperative resuscitation; p = 0.86) and grade 3 morbidity (28% GDT vs 18% standard perioperative resuscitation; p = 0.22) were equivalent. Patients in the GDT arm received less intraoperative fluid (mean 2.0 L GDT vs 2.9 L standard perioperative resuscitation; p < 0.001). Perioperative transfusions were required in 4% (6% GDT vs 2% standard perioperative resuscitation; p = 0.37) and boluses in the postanesthesia care unit were administered to 24% (29% GDT vs 20% standard perioperative resuscitation; p = 0.23). Mortality rate was 1% (2 of 135 patients; both in GDT). On multivariable analysis, male sex, age, combined procedures, higher intraoperative fluid volume, and fluid boluses in the postanesthesia care unit were associated with higher 30-day morbidity.ConclusionsStroke volume variation-guided GDT is safe in patients undergoing liver resection and led to less intraoperative fluid. Although the incidence of postoperative complications was similar in both arms, lower intraoperative resuscitation volume was independently associated with decreased postoperative morbidity in the entire cohort. Future studies should target extensive resections and identify patients receiving large resuscitation volumes, as this population is more likely to benefit from this technique.

Project description:ObjectiveThe present study aimed to investigate the association of postoperative central venous pressure (CVP) with acute kidney injury (AKI) and mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodPatients who underwent CABG in the MIMIC-III database were included and divided into two groups according to the optimal cutoff value of CVP for postoperative AKI determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The association of CVP with AKI and mortality was determined by multivariate regression models. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the influence of potential confounding factors.ResultsA total of 3,564 patients were included and divided into High CVP group (CVP ≥ 10.9 mmHg) and Low CVP group (CVP < 10.9 mmHg) according to the ROC analysis. Patients in High CVP group presented with higher AKI incidence (420 (28.2%) vs. 349 (16.8), p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (28 (1.9%) vs. 6 (0.3%), p < 0.001) and 4-year mortality (149 (15.8%) vs. 162 (11.1%), p = 0.001). Multivariate regression model showed that CVP was an independent risk factor for the postoperative AKI (OR: 1.071 (1.035, 1.109), p < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.187 (1.026, 1.373), p = 0.021) and 4-year mortality (HR: 1.049 (1.003, 1.096), p = 0.035). A CVP above 10.9 mmHg was significantly associated with about 50% higher risk of AKI (OR: 1.499 (1.231, 1.824), p < 0.001). After PSM, 1004 pairs of score-matched patients were generated. The multivariate logistic model showed that patients with CVP ≥ 10.9 mmHg had a significantly higher risk of AKI (OR: 1.600 (1.268, 2.018), p < 0.001) in the PSM subset. However, CVP, as a continuous or a dichotomic variable, was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.202 (0.882, 1.637), p = 0.244; OR: 2.636 (0.399, 17.410), p = 0.314) and 4-year mortality (HR: 1.030 (0.974, 1.090), p = 0.297; HR: 1.262 (0.911, 1.749), p = 0.162) in the PSM dataset.ConclusionA mean CVP ≥ 10.9 mmHg within the first 24 h after CABG was independently associated with a higher risk of postoperative AKI.

Project description:PurposeWe evaluated the impact of increasing tidal volume (V (t)), decreased chest wall compliance, and left ventricular (LV) contractility during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) on the relation between pulse pressure (PP) and LV stroke volume (SV(LV)) variation (PPV and SVV, respectively), and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) changes.MethodsSixteen pentobarbital-anesthetized thoracotomized mongrel dogs were studied both before and after propranolol-induced acute ventricular failure (AVF) (n = 4), with and without chest and abdominal pneumatic binders to decrease chest wall compliance (n = 6), and during V (t) of 5, 10, 15, and 25 ml/kg (n = 6). SV(LV) and right ventricular stroke volume (SV(RV)) were derived from electromagnetic flow probes around aortic and pulmonary artery roots. Arterial pressure was measured in the aorta using a fluid-filled catheter. Arterial PPV and SVV were calculated over three breaths as (max - min)/[(max + min)/2]. ITBV changes during ventilation were inferred from the beat-to-beat volume differences between SV(RV) and SV(LV).ResultsArterial PP and SV(LV) were tightly correlated during IPPV under all conditions (r (2) = 0.85). Both PPV and SVV increased progressively as V (t) increased and with thoraco-abdominal binding, and tended to decrease during AVF. SV(RV) phasically decreased during inspiration, whereas SV(LV) phasically decreased 2-3 beats later, such that ITBV decreased during inspiration and returned to apneic values during expiration. ITBV decrements increased with increasing V (t) or with thoraco-abdominal binding, and decreased during AVF owing to variations in SV(RV), such that both PPV and SVV tightly correlated with inspiration-associated changes in SV(RV) and ITBV.ConclusionArterial PP and SV(LV) are tightly correlated during IPPV and their relation is not altered by selective changes in LV contractility, intrathoracic pressure, or V (t). However, contractility, intrathoracic pressure, and V (t) directly alter the magnitude of PPV and SVV primarily by altering the inspiration-associated decreases in SV(RV) and ITBV.

Project description:BackgroundPulse pressure and stroke volume variation (PPV and SVV) have been widely used in surgical patients as predictors of fluid challenge (FC) response. Several factors may affect the reliability of these indices in predicting fluid responsiveness, such as the position of the patient, the use of laparoscopy and the opening of the abdomen or the chest, combined FC characteristics, the tidal volume (Vt) and the type of anesthesia.MethodsSystematic review and metanalysis of PPV and SVV use in surgical adult patients. The QUADAS-2 scale was used to assess the risk of bias of included studies. We adopted a metanalysis pooling of aggregate data from 5 subgroups of studies with random effects models using the common-effect inverse variance model. The area under the curve (AUC) of pooled receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves was reported. A metaregression was performed using FC type, volume, and rate as independent variables.ResultsWe selected 59 studies enrolling 2,947 patients, with a median of fluid responders of 55% (46-63). The pooled AUC for the PPV was 0.77 (0.73-0.80), with a mean threshold of 10.8 (10.6-11.0). The pooled AUC for the SVV was 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with a mean threshold of 12.1 (11.6-12.7); 19 studies (32.2%) reported the grey zone of PPV or SVV, with a median of 56% (40-62) and 57% (46-83) of patients included, respectively. In the different subgroups, the AUC and the best thresholds ranged from 0.69 and 0.81 and from 6.9 to 11.5% for the PPV, and from 0.73 to 0.79 and 9.9 to 10.8% for the SVV. A high Vt and the choice of colloids positively impacted on PPV performance, especially among patients with closed chest and abdomen, or in prone position.ConclusionThe overall performance of PPV and SVV in operating room in predicting fluid responsiveness is moderate, ranging close to an AUC of 0.80 only some subgroups of surgical patients. The grey zone of these dynamic indices is wide and should be carefully considered during the assessment of fluid responsiveness. A high Vt and the choice of colloids for the FC are factors potentially influencing PPV reliability.Trial registrationPROSPERO (CRD42022379120), December 2022. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=379120.

Dataset Information

A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets