Protection against Reinfection with the Omicron BA.2.75 Subvariant.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Chemaitelly H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9878583 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Protection against Reinfection with the Omicron BA.2.75 Subvariant.
Chemaitelly Hiam H Tang Patrick P Coyle Peter P Yassine Hadi M HM Al-Khatib Hebah A HA Smatti Maria K MK Hasan Mohammad R MR Ayoub Houssein H HH Altarawneh Heba N HN Al-Kanaani Zaina Z Al-Kuwari Einas E Jeremijenko Andrew A Kaleeckal Anvar H AH Latif Ali N AN Shaik Riyazuddin M RM Abdul-Rahim Hanan F HF Nasrallah Gheyath K GK Al-Kuwari Mohamed G MG Butt Adeel A AA Al-Romaihi Hamad E HE Al-Thani Mohamed H MH Al-Khal Abdullatif A Bertollini Roberto R Abu-Raddad Laith J LJ
The New England journal of medicine 20230118 7
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9450472 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariant BA.2.75 emerged recently and appears to be spreading. It has nine mutations in spike compared with the currently circulating BA.2, raising concerns that it may further evade vaccine-elicited and therapeutic antibodies. We found BA.2.75 to be moderately more neutralization resistant to sera from vaccinated/boosted individuals than BA.2 (1.8-fold), similar to BA.2.12.1 (1.1-fold), but more neutralization sensitive than BA.4/5 (0.6-fold). Relative to BA.2, BA.2.75 showed heightened resistance to class 1 and class 3 monoclonal antibodies targeting the spike-receptor-binding domain while gaining sensitivity to class 2 antibodies. Resistance was largely conferred by G446S and R460K mutations. BA.2.75 was slightly resistant (3.7-fold) to bebtelovimab, a therapeutic antibody with potent activity against all Omicron subvariants. BA.2.75 also exhibited a higher binding affinity to host receptor ACE2 than other Omicron subvariants. BA.2.75 provides further insight into SARS-CoV-2 evolution as it gains transmissibility while incrementally evading antibody neutralization.
| S-EPMC9444898 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In this study, we explored the genomic architecture and phylogenomic relationship of BA.2.75, a subvariant of Omicron SARS-CoV-2. A set of 1468 whole-genome sequences of BA.2.75, submitted by 28 countries worldwide were retrieved from GISAID and used for finding genomic mutations. Moreover, the phylogenetic analysis of BA.2.75 was performed by using 2948 whole-genome sequences of all sub-variants of Omicron along with the Delta variant of SAS-CoV-2. We detected 1885 mutations, which were further grouped into 1025 missense mutations, 740 silent mutations, 72 mutations in non-coding regions, 16 in-frame deletions, 02 in-frame insertions, 8 frameshift deletions, 8 frameshift insertions and 14 stop-gained variants. Additionally, we also found 11 characteristic mutations having a prevalence of 81-99% and were not observed in any of the previously reported variant of SARS-CoV-2. Out of these mutations K147E, W152R, F157L, E210V, V213G, G339H were found in the NTD, and G446S & N460K in the RBD region of the Spike protein, whereas S403L and T11A were present in the NSP3, and E protein respectively. The phylogenetic relationship of this variant revealed that BA.2.75 is descended from the Omicron sub-variant BA.5. This evolutionary relationship suggests that the surge of BA.5 infections can reduce the severity of the infections accredited to BA.2.75. These findings would also improve our knowledge and understanding that how genetic similarities in different variants of SARS-CoV-2 can prime the immune system to fight off the infection caused by one subvariant, after defeating the other.
| S-EPMC10208454 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10065376 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The Omicron variants spread rapidly worldwide after being initially detected in South Africa in November 2021. It showed increased transmissibility and immune evasion with far more amino acid mutations in the Spike (S) protein than the previously circulating variant of concern (VOC). Notably, on 15 July 2022, we monitored the first VOC/Omicron subvariant BA.2.75 in China from an imported case. Moreover, nowadays, this subvariant still is predominant in India. It has nine additional mutations in the S protein compared to BA.2, three of which (W152R, G446S, and R493Q reversion) might contribute to higher transmissibility and immune escape. This subvariant could cause wider spread and pose a threat to the global situation. Our timely reporting and continuous genomic analysis are essential to fully elucidate the characteristics of the subvariant BA.2.75 in the future.
| S-EPMC9613801 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9730936 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was reported to evade immunity derived from vaccination and previous infection. A better understanding of hybrid immunity informs effective infection control strategies. Since the reinfection risk was not well-assessed in East Asia, this study aims to evaluate the risk of infection with Omicron subvariant BA.5 among previously infected individuals in Japan.MethodsAll notified cases were extracted from the Japanese national COVID-19 surveillance database including 20,297,335 records up to 25 September 2022. Reinfection with BA.5 was defined as the infection notified during the BA.5 dominated period with any prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The protective effect of prior infections against reinfections with BA.5 was estimated by applying a case-population design and the protective effect of vaccination was estimated by a multivariable Cox regression adjusting for age, sex, variants of prior infection, and the time since the last vaccination.FindingsAmong 19,830,548 SARS-CoV-2 first infections, 233,424 (1.2%) were reinfected with BA.5. The protective effect against BA.5 reinfection of prior infection with Wuhan strain was 46%, Alpha variant was 35%, Delta variant was 41%, and BA.1/BA.2 subvariant was 74%. The reduced risk of BA.5 reinfection by 7%, 33%, and 66% was associated with two, three, and four doses of vaccination, respectively, compared with one-dose vaccination.InterpretationThe prior infections with Omicron subvariant BA.1/BA.2 protected BA.5 reinfection more than pre-Omicron variants. Increased frequency of vaccination led to more protection from reinfection with BA.5. Up-to-date vaccination may be encouraged to prevent future reinfection among the previously infected population.FundingNone.
| S-EPMC10786644 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Estimates of immunity and severity for the SARS-CoV-2 omicron subvariant BA.5 are important to assess the public health impact associated with its rapid global spread despite vaccination. We estimated natural and vaccine immunity and severity of BA.5 relative to BA.2 in Denmark, a country with high mRNA-vaccination coverage and free-of-charge RT-PCR testing. This nation-wide population-based study in Denmark included residents aged 18 years or older who had taken an RT-PCR test between 10 April and 30 June, 2022 (ie, the outcome period), and who the national COVID-19 surveillance system identified as having information since February 2020 on RT-PCR tests, whole-genome sequencing, vaccinations, and hospitalisation with a positive RT-PCR test and COVID-19 as the main diagnosis. First, we used a case-control design, in which cases were people infected with BA.5 or BA.2 during the outcome period and controls were people who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the outcome period. We calculated the protection provided by a previous PCR-confirmed omicron infection against BA.5 and BA.2 infection and hospitalisation among triple-vaccinated individuals. Second, we compared vaccination status in people infected with BA.5 versus BA.2 and estimated relative vaccine protection against each subvariant. Third, we compared rates of hospitalisation for COVID-19 among people infected with BA.5 versus BA.2. We estimated effects using logistic regression with adjustment for sex, age, region, PCR-test date, comorbidity and, as appropriate, vaccination and previous infection status. A total of 210 (2·4%) of 8678 of BA.5 cases, 192 (0·7%) of 29 292 of BA.2 cases, and 33 972 (19·0%) of 178 669 PCR-negative controls previously had an omicron infection, which was estimated in the adjusted analyses to offer 92·7% (95% CI 91·6-93·7) protection against BA.5 infection and 97·1% (96·6-97·5) protection against BA.2 infection. We found similarly high amounts of protection against hospitalisation owing to infection with BA.5 (96·4% [95% CI 74·2-99·5]) and BA.2 (91·2% [76·3-96·7]). Vaccine coverage (three mRNA doses vs none) was 9307 (94·2%) of 9878 among BA.5 cases and 30 581 (94·8%) of 32 272 among BA.2 cases, although in the adjusted analysis, there was a trend towards slightly higher vaccination coverage among BA.5 cases than BA.2 cases (OR 1·18 [95% CI 0·99-1·42]; p=0·064), possibly suggesting marginally poorer vaccine protection against BA.5. The rate of hospitalisation due to COVID-19 was higher among the BA.5 cases (210 [1·9%] of 11 314) than among the BA.2 cases (514 [1·4%] of 36 805), with an OR of 1·34 (95% CI 1·14-1·57) and an adjusted OR of 1·69 (95% CI 1·22-2·33), despite low and stable COVID-19 hospitalisation numbers during the study period. The study provides evidence that a previous omicron infection in triple-vaccinated individuals provides high amounts of protection against BA.5 and BA.2 infections. However, protection estimates greater than 90% might be too high if individuals with a previous infection were more likely than those without one to come forward for a test for reasons other than suspicion of COVID-19. Our analysis also showed that vaccine protection against BA.5 infection was similar to, or slightly weaker than, protection against BA.2 infection. Finally, there was evidence that BA.5 infections were associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation compared with BA.2 infections. There was no funding source for this study.
| S-EPMC9578720 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9552143 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8929374 | biostudies-literature