Dataset Information

Can use of the serum anti-PLA2R antibody negate the need for a renal biopsy in primary membranous nephropathy?

ABSTRACT:

Background

Since the emergence of the anti-PLA2R antibody (PLA2R-Ab) test, nephrology practice has not changed dramatically, with most nephrologists still relying on a kidney biopsy to diagnose membranous nephropathy. In this study, we examined the clinical accuracy of the anti-PLA2R antibody test using ELISA in routine clinical care.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of PLA2R-Ab testing in 187 consecutive patients seen at a single UK centre between 2003 and 2020. We compared the kidney biopsy findings with the PLA2R-ab antibody test. Patients' demography, urine protein creatinine ratios, serum albumin, and treatment characteristics including supportive and immunosuppressive treatment were recorded. The clinical accuracy of the test (e.g. sensitivity and specificity, positive [PPV] and negative [NPV] predictive values) was calculated using the kidney biopsy findings as the diagnostic reference.

Results

Mean levels of PLA2R-Ab titre in primary membranous nephropathy were 217RU/ml in comparison to 3RU/ml for both secondary membranous nephropathy and other diagnoses. Most patients with a positive PLA2R-Ab test had a confirmed renal biopsy diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy with: PPV of 97.3%, sensitivity 75.5%, NPV was 79.8% and specificity was 97.8% at a cut-off threshold of >20 RU/ml.

Conclusion

The anti-PLA2R antibody test is a highly specific test for diagnosing membranous nephropathy, and the test has the potential to allow for the diagnosis and treatment in up to 75% of PMN cases without the need for a renal biopsy. Nevertheless, patients with negative PLA2R-Ab tests will still require a biopsy to confirm their diagnosis.

SUBMITTER: Ragy O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9955960 | biostudies-literature | 2023

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Can use of the serum anti-PLA2R antibody negate the need for a renal biopsy in primary membranous nephropathy?

Ragy Omar O Rautemaa Vilma V Smith Alison A Brenchley Paul P Kanigicherla Durga D Hamilton Patrick P

PloS one 20230224 2

<h4>Background</h4>Since the emergence of the anti-PLA2R antibody (PLA2R-Ab) test, nephrology practice has not changed dramatically, with most nephrologists still relying on a kidney biopsy to diagnose membranous nephropathy. In this study, we examined the clinical accuracy of the anti-PLA2R antibody test using ELISA in routine clinical care.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective analysis of PLA2R-Ab testing in 187 consecutive patients seen at a single UK centre between 2003 and 2020. We c ...[more]

PMID: 36827283

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundM-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) is known as a major antigen on podocytes, which is involved with the pathogenesis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN). Many studies have shown that serum anti-PLA2R autoantibodies (sPLA2R) are prevalent in patients with iMN but are rarely detected in secondary membranous nephropathy (SMN) or other glomerulonephritis. The anti-PLA2R is considered as a promising serum biomarker in iMN but reports about its diagnostic value are variable and inconsistent.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of anti-PLA2R and glomerular PLA2R antigen (gPLA2R) for diagnosing iMN.MethodMEDLINE, EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE, and COCHRANE LIBRARY were searched from 2009 January to February 2018. Heterogeneity was evaluated by Q test and I2. Source of heterogeneity was explored by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Meta-analysis was executed and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement.ResultsTotally, 35 studies were retrieved under the pre-set study eligibility criteria. Twenty-eight studies were included to evaluate the DTA of anti-PLA2R for differentiating iMN from non-iMN. They indicated a pooled sensitivity of 65% (63-67%), specificity of 97% (97-98%), positive likelihood ratio of 15.65 (9.95-24.62), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.37 (0.32-0.42) with a diagnostic OR (sDOR) of 50.41 (31.56 to 80.52) and AUC of 0.9393. No threshold effect was detected. The heterogeneity analysis for sDOR showed that I2 = 50.3% and Cochran-Q = 54.29, df = 27 (p = 0.0014). Heterogeneity was significant. Meta-regression revealed that sample size might be the potential source of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that method type and ratio of patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria at baseline might be the source of heterogeneity. Sixteen studies reported the diagnostic value of glomerular PLA2R antigen for differentiating iMN from non-iMN. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, sDOR, and AUC were 79% (76-81%), 90% (88-92%), 8.17 (5.60-11.93), 0.25 (0.19-0.33), 39.37 (22.18-60.13), and 0.9278. Heterogeneity analysis showed that Cochran-Q = 35.36; df = 15 (p = 0.002), and I2 for sDOR was 57.6%.ConclusionsPLA2R and gPLA2R demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating iMN and non-iMN.

Project description:Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is a renal-specific autoimmune disease caused by circulating autoantibodies that target glomerular podocyte antigens (PLA2R/THSD7A). However, very little is known on the molecular mechanisms controlling B cell response in this nephropathy. The present study was aimed at correlating the serum levels of B cell activators BAFF/BLyS and APRIL with the presence of anti-PLA2R antibodies in PMN patients and with long-term clinical outcome. To this aim, 51 patients with anti-PLA2R-positive biopsy-proven PMN and nephrotic range proteinuria (>3.5 g/24 hours) were enrolled between January 2009 and December 2015 and treated with conventional 6-month immunosuppressive therapy. After 6 months, 29 patients (56.9%) cleared circulating anti-PLA2R, while in remaining 22 (43.1%), they persisted. Intriguingly, in the first group, baseline serum levels of BAFF/BLyS and APRIL were significantly lower than those in the second one. Moreover, after 6 months of immunosuppressive therapy, an overall reduction in both cytokine serum levels was observed. However, in PMN patients with anti-PLA2R clearance, this reduction was more prominent, as compared with those with anti-PLA2R persistence. When related to clinical outcome, lower baseline BAFF/BLyS (<6.05 ng/mL) and APRIL (<4.20 ng/mL) serum levels were associated with significantly higher probability to achieve complete or partial remission after 24-month follow-up. After dividing the entire study cohort into three groups depending on both cytokine baseline serum levels, patients with both BAFF/BLyS and APRIL below the cut-off showed a significantly higher rate of complete or partial remission as compared with patients with only one cytokine above the cut-off, while the composite endpoint was achieved in a very low rate of patients with both cytokines above the cut-off. Taken together, these results provide new insights into the role of BAFF/BLyS and APRIL in both the pathogenesis of anti-PLA2R-positive PMN and the response to immunosuppressive therapy.

Dataset Information

Can use of the serum anti-PLA2R antibody negate the need for a renal biopsy in primary membranous nephropathy?

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Can use of the serum anti-PLA2R antibody negate the need for a renal biopsy in primary membranous nephropathy?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets