Dataset Information

Effects of a contoured articular prosthetic device on tibiofemoral peak contact pressure: a biomechanical study.

ABSTRACT: Many middle-aged patients are affected by localized cartilage defects that are neither appropriate for primary, nor repeat biological repair methods, nor for conventional arthroplasty. This in vitro study aims to determine the peak contact pressure in the tibiofemoral joint with a partial femoral resurfacing device (HemiCAP, Arthrosurface Inc., Franklin, MA, USA). Peak contact pressure was determined in eight fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens using a Tekscan sensor placed in the medial compartment above the menisci. A closed loop robotic knee simulator was used to test each knee in static stance positions (5 degrees /15 degrees /30 degrees /45 degrees ) with body weight ground reaction force (GRF), 30 degrees flexion with twice the body weight (2tBW) GRF and dynamic knee-bending cycles with body weight GRF. The ground reaction force was adjusted to the living body weight of the cadaver donor and maintained throughout all cycles. Each specimen was tested under four different conditions: Untreated, flush HemiCAP implantation, 1-mm proud implantation and 20-mm defect. A paired sampled t test to compare means (significance, P < or = 0.05) was used for statistical analysis. On average, no statistically significant differences were found in any testing condition comparing the normal knee with flush device implantation. With the 1-mm proud implant, statistically significant increase of peak contact pressures of 217% (5 degrees stance), 99% (dynamic knee bending) and 90% (30 degrees stance with 2tBW) compared to the untreated condition was seen. No significant increase of peak contact pressure was evaluated with the 20-mm defect. The data suggests that resurfacing with the HemiCAP does not lead to increased peak contact pressure with flush implantation. However, elevated implantation results in increased peak contact pressure and might be biomechanically disadvantageous in an in vivo application.

SUBMITTER: Becher C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2190783 | biostudies-other | 2008 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAn understudied area of proximal first metatarsal osteotomies is the effect on articular contact properties following the surgeries. Potential long-term risks include altered joint mechanics and possible arthritic progression. A biomechanical comparison of articular characteristics of the proximal opening wedge and Ludloff osteotomies was performed in this study. It was hypothesized that the proximal opening wedge osteotomy (POWO) would lead to greater alterations in articular contact properties along the first ray.MethodsSeven paired fresh-frozen below-knee cadaveric limbs with hallux valgus were selected. Specimens in each pair were tested in the intact state and then randomized to receive either a Ludloff or POWO. A 4-mm opening wedge osteotomy was used in all cases. Loading of the flexor hallucis longus was to 100 N using an instrumented tensioner. A 28-N load was added at the distal phalanx to simulate the ground reaction force. First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and tarsometatarsal (TMT) articular properties were recorded simultaneously using 2 pressure sensors. For each state, a pressure map was generated and contact area, peak pressure, and center of pressure were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess statistical significance.ResultsAverage peak pressure was noted to be elevated at the MTP (4.6 vs 6.9 mPa, P = .04) and TMT (3.3 mPa vs 5.1 mPa, P = .30) joints when comparing the Ludloff and the POWO, respectively. Contact area was also noted to be lower in the POWO relative to the Ludloff for the MTP (86.6 vs 69.1 mm2, P = .30) but not the TMT joints (89.1 vs 88.5 mm2, P = .97). There was a slight plantar-lateral and dorsomedial shift in pressure at the MTP and TMT articulations, respectively, of the POWO relative to the Ludloff. A trend toward decreased contact force within the TMT joint was noted following opening wedge osteotomy relative to the intact state (103.8 vs 113.9 N, P = .31), while forces were elevated at the MTP joint (104.3 vs 96.0 N, P = .63), although not statistically significant. Smaller increases in TMT and MTP joint forces were noted following the Ludloff when compared to the intact state (95.6 vs 93.3 N at TMT and 109.2 vs 103.2 N at MTP).ConclusionPOWO can potentially change articular contact characteristics along the TMT and MTP articulations of the first ray. This could possibly lead to altered loading patterns and possible long-term damage vs other osteotomies.Clinical relevanceWhile it is unlikely that the changes observed with the sizes of the osteotomy commonly used would lead to long-term significant clinical consequences, further study with larger group sizes would be beneficial.

Project description:Background:Some studies have suggested that altered tibiofemoral cartilage contact behavior (arthrokinematics) may contribute to long-term cartilage degeneration, potentially leading to tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. However, few studies have assessed normal tibiofemoral arthrokinematics during dynamic activities. Purpose:To characterize tibiofemoral arthrokinematics during the impact phase of level walking and downhill running. Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study. Methods:Arthrokinematic data were collected on uninjured knees of 44 participants (mean age, 20.7 ± 6.6 years). Using a dynamic stereoradiographic imaging system with superimposed 3-dimensional bone models from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of participant-specific tibiofemoral joints, arthrokinematics were assessed during the first 15% of the gait cycle during level walking and the first 10% of the gait cycle during downhill running. Results:During level walking and downhill running, the medial compartment had a greater cartilage contact area versus the lateral compartment. Both compartments had a significantly less cartilage contact area during running versus walking (medial compartment gait cycle affected: 8%-10%; lateral compartment gait cycle affected: 5%-10%). Further, medial and lateral compartment tibiofemoral contact paths were significantly more posterior and longer during downhill running. Conclusion:There was a decreased tibiofemoral cartilage contact area during downhill running compared with level walking, suggesting that underlying bone morphology may play a key role in determining the size of cartilage contact regions. Clinical Relevance:This study provides the first data characterizing tibiofemoral cartilage contact patterns during level walking and downhill running. These results provide evidence in support of performing biomechanical assessments during both level walking and downhill running to obtain a comprehensive picture of tibiofemoral cartilage behavior after clinical interventions.

Project description:BackgroundImaging cannot be performed during natural weightbearing in biomechanical studies using conventional closed-bore MRI, which has necessitated simulating weightbearing load on the joint. Upright, open MRI (UO-MRI) allows for joint imaging during natural weightbearing and may have the potential to better characterize the biomechanical effect of tibiofemoral pathology involving soft tissues. However open MRI scanners have lower field strengths than closed-bore scanners, which limits the image quality that can be obtained. Thus, there is a need to establish the reliability of measurements in upright weightbearing postures obtained using UO-MRI.MethodsKnees of five participants with prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture were scanned standing in a 0.5 T upright open MRI scanner using a 3D DESS sequence. Manual segmentation of cartilage regions in contact was performed and centroids of these contact areas were automatically determined for the medial and lateral tibiofemoral compartments. Inter-rater, test-retest, and intra-rater reliability were determined and quantified using intra-class correlation (ICC3,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest detectable change with 95% confidence (SDC95). Accuracy was assessed by using a high-resolution 7 T MRI as a reference.ResultsContact area and centroid location reliability (inter-rater, test-retest, and intra-rater) for sagittal scans in the medial compartment had ICC3,1 values from 0.95-0.99 and 0.98-0.99 respectively. In the lateral compartment, contact area and centroid location reliability ICC3,1 values ranged from 0.83-0.91 and 0.95-1.00 respectively. The smallest detectable change in contact area was 1.28% in the medial compartment and 0.95% in the lateral compartment. Contact area and centroid location reliability for coronal scans in the medial compartment had ICC3,1 values from 0.90-0.98 and 0.98-1.00 respectively, and in the lateral compartment ICC3,1 ranged from 0.76-0.94 and 0.93-1.00 respectively. The smallest detectable change in contact area was 0.65% in the medial compartment and 1.41% in the lateral compartment. Contact area was accurate to within a mean absolute error of 11.0 mm2.ConclusionsKnee contact area and contact centroid location can be assessed in upright weightbearing MRI with good to excellent reliability. The lower field strength used in upright, weightbearing MRI does not compromise the reliability of tibiofemoral contact area and centroid location measures.

Dataset Information

Effects of a contoured articular prosthetic device on tibiofemoral peak contact pressure: a biomechanical study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets