Dataset Information

Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.

ABSTRACT: Although normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear implant (CI) listeners are able to adapt to spectrally shifted speech to some degree, auditory training has been shown to provide more complete and/or accelerated adaptation. However, it is unclear whether listeners use auditory and visual feedback to improve discrimination of speech stimuli, or to learn the identity of speech stimuli. The present study investigated the effects of training with lexical and nonlexical labels on NH listeners' perceptual adaptation to spectrally degraded and spectrally shifted vowels. An eight-channel sine wave vocoder was used to simulate CI speech processing. Two degrees of spectral shift (moderate and severe shift) were studied with three training paradigms, including training with lexical labels (i.e., "hayed," "had," "who'd," etc.), training with nonlexical labels (i.e., randomly assigned letters "f," "b," "g," etc.), and repeated testing with lexical labels (i.e., "test-only" paradigm without feedback). All training and testing was conducted over 5 consecutive days, with two to four training exercises per day. Results showed that with the test-only paradigm, lexically labeled vowel recognition significantly improved for moderately shifted vowels; however, there was no significant improvement for severely shifted vowels. Training with nonlexical labels significantly improved the recognition of nonlexically labeled vowels for both shift conditions; however, this improvement failed to generalize to lexically labeled vowel recognition with severely shifted vowels. Training with lexical labels significantly improved lexically labeled vowel recognition with severely shifted vowels. These results suggest that storage and retrieval of speech patterns in the central nervous system is somewhat robust to tonotopic distortion and spectral degradation. Although training with nonlexical labels may improve discrimination of spectrally distorted peripheral patterns, lexically meaningful feedback is needed to identify these peripheral patterns. The results also suggest that training with lexically meaningful feedback may be beneficial to CI users, especially patients with shallow electrode insertion depths.

SUBMITTER: Li T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2538416 | biostudies-other | 2007 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Adaptation of saccades can be induced by different error signals, such as retinal position errors, prediction errors, or reinforcement learning. Recently, we showed that a shift in the spatial goal of a perceptual task can induce saccadic adaptation, in the absence of a bottom-up position error. Here, we investigated whether this top-down effect is mediated by the visibility of the task-relevant object, by reinforcement due to the feedback about the perceptual judgment or by a target selection mechanism. Participants were asked to discriminate visual stimuli arranged in a vertical compound. To induce adaptation, the discrimination target was presented at eccentric locations in the compound. In the first experiment, we compared adaptation with an easy and difficult discrimination. In the second experiment, we compared adaptation when feedback about the perceptual task was valid and when feedback was provided but was unrelated to performance. In the third experiment, we compared adaptation with instructions to fixate one of the elements in the compound-target selection-to the perceptual task condition-target selection and discrimination. To control for a bottom-up stimulus effect, we ran a fourth experiment in which the only instruction was to look at the compound. The saccade amplitude data were fitted by a two-state model distinguishing between an immediate and a gradual error correction process. We replicated our finding that a perceptual task can drive adaptation of saccades. Adaptation showed no effect of feedback reliability, nor an effect of the perceptual task beyond target selection. Adaptation was induced by a top-down signal since it was absent when there was no target selection instruction and no perceptual task. The immediate error correction was larger for the difficult than for the easy condition, suggesting that task difficulty affects mainly voluntary saccade targeting. In addition, the repetition of experiments one week later increased the magnitude of the gradual error correction. The results dissociate two distinct components of adaptation: an immediate and a gradual error correction. We conclude that perceptual-task induced adaptation is most likely due to top-down target selection within a larger object.

Dataset Information

Perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted vowels: training with nonlexical labels.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets