Dataset Information

Factors in tissue handling and processing that impact RNA obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

ABSTRACT: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most common specimen available for molecular assays on tissue after diagnostic histopathological examination. RNA from FFPE tissue suffers from strand breakage and cross-linking. Despite excellent extraction methods, RNA quality from FFPE material remains variable. To address the RNA quality factors within FFPE tissues, we studied RNA quality, isolating individual elements of the tissue fixation and processing including length of fixation in formalin and the type of buffer incorporated in the fixative. We examined the impact of the length of the tissue processing cycle as well. The optimal fixation period of 12-24 hr in phosphate-buffered formalin resulted in better-quality RNA. Longer tissue processing times were associated with higher quality RNA. We determined that the middle region of gene suffers less damage by these processes as shown by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. These data provide key information for the development of methods of analysis of gene expression in archival FFPE tissues and contribute to the establishment of objective standards for the processing and handling of tissue in surgical pathology. This manuscript contains online supplemental material at http://www.jhc.org. Please visit this article online to view these materials.

SUBMITTER: Chung JY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2569903 | biostudies-other | 2008 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Factors in tissue handling and processing that impact RNA obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Chung Joon-Yong JY Braunschweig Till T Williams Reginald R Guerrero Natalie N Hoffmann Karl M KM Kwon Mijung M Song Young K YK Libutti Steven K SK Hewitt Stephen M SM

The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society 20080818 11

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue is the most common specimen available for molecular assays on tissue after diagnostic histopathological examination. RNA from FFPE tissue suffers from strand breakage and cross-linking. Despite excellent extraction methods, RNA quality from FFPE material remains variable. To address the RNA quality factors within FFPE tissues, we studied RNA quality, isolating individual elements of the tissue fixation and processing including length of fixation in ...[more]

PMID: 18711211

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Utilization of RNA sequencing methods to measure gene expression from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples in translational research and clinical trials requires reliable interpretation of the impact of pre-analytical variables on the data obtained, particularly the methods used to preserve samples and to purify RNA. METHODS:Matched tissue samples from 12 breast cancers were fresh frozen (FF) and preserved in RNAlater or fixed in formalin and processed as FFPE tissue. Total RNA was extracted and purified from FF samples using the Qiagen RNeasy kit, and in duplicate from FFPE tissue sections using three different kits (Norgen, Qiagen and Roche). All RNA samples underwent whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (wtRNAseq) and targeted RNA sequencing for 31 transcripts included in a signature of sensitivity to endocrine therapy. We assessed the effect of RNA extraction kit on the reliability of gene expression levels using linear mixed-effects model analysis, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and differential analysis. All protein-coding genes in the wtRNAseq and three gene expression signatures for breast cancer were assessed for concordance. RESULTS:Despite variable quality of the RNA extracted from FFPE samples by different kits, all had similar concordance of overall gene expression from wtRNAseq between matched FF and FFPE samples (median CCC 0.63-0.66) and between technical replicates (median expression difference 0.13-0.22). More than half of genes were differentially expressed between FF and FFPE, but with low fold change (median |LFC| 0.31-0.34). Two out of three breast cancer signatures studied were highly robust in all samples using any kit, whereas the third signature was similarly discordant irrespective of the kit used. The targeted RNAseq assay was concordant between FFPE and FF samples using any of the kits (CCC 0.91-0.96). CONCLUSIONS:The selection of kit to purify RNA from FFPE did not influence the overall quality of results from wtRNAseq, thus variable reproducibility of gene signatures probably relates to the reliability of individual gene selected and possibly to the algorithm. Targeted RNAseq showed promising performance for clinical deployment of quantitative assays in breast cancer from FFPE samples, although numerical scores were not identical to those from wtRNAseq and would require calibration.

Dataset Information

Factors in tissue handling and processing that impact RNA obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Publications

Factors in tissue handling and processing that impact RNA obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets