Dataset Information

Both treated and untreated tumors are eliminated by short hairpin RNA-based induction of target-specific immune responses.

ABSTRACT: RNA interference (RNAi) for cancer treatment relies on the ability to directly kill cancer cells via down-regulation of target genes, but issues of delivery and efficacy have limited clinical adoption. Furthermore, current studies using immune-deficient animal models disregard potential interactions with the adaptive immune system. It has previously been observed that certain viral antigens appear to be more rapidly presented to the immune system than normal proteins due to the production of defective ribosomal products by the virus. Given that RNAi could potentially result in the generation of truncated mRNAs, we wondered whether a similar mechanism of immune presentation of a target gene was possible. Here we show that RNAi-cleaved mRNAs can be translated into incomplete protein, and if cleavage was downstream of cytotoxic T cell epitopes, resulted in increased presentation of target protein and the generation of a tumor-protective immune response. We show that mice inoculated with tumor cells treated with such short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) were protected from subsequent challenge with untreated tumors. However, protection was only found if shRNAs were targeted downstream of the dominant cytotoxic T cell (CTL) epitope. Our work suggests that RNAi can alter immunity to targets and shows that not all tumor cells require direct RNAi exposure for treatment to be effective in vivo, pointing the way to a new class of RNAi-based therapy.

SUBMITTER: Gu W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC2688843 | biostudies-other | 2009 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Both treated and untreated tumors are eliminated by short hairpin RNA-based induction of target-specific immune responses.

Gu Wenyi W Cochrane Melanie M Leggatt Graham R GR Payne Elizabeth E Choyce Allison A Zhou Fang F Tindle Robert R McMillan Nigel A J NA

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 20090504 20

RNA interference (RNAi) for cancer treatment relies on the ability to directly kill cancer cells via down-regulation of target genes, but issues of delivery and efficacy have limited clinical adoption. Furthermore, current studies using immune-deficient animal models disregard potential interactions with the adaptive immune system. It has previously been observed that certain viral antigens appear to be more rapidly presented to the immune system than normal proteins due to the production of def ...[more]

PMID: 19416823

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHIV-associated general immune activation is a strong predictor for HIV disease progression, suggesting that chronic immune activation may drive HIV pathogenesis. Consequently, immunomodulating agents may decelerate HIV disease progression.MethodsIn an observational study, we determined immune activation in HIV patients receiving low-dose (5 mg/day) prednisolone with or without highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) compared to patients without prednisolone treatment. Lymphocyte activation was determined by flow cytometry detecting expression of CD38 on CD8(+) T cells. The monocyte activation markers sCD14 and LPS binding protein (LBP) as well as inflammation markers soluble urokinase plasminogen activated receptor (suPAR) and sCD40L were determined from plasma by ELISA.ResultsCD38-expression on CD8+ T lymphocytes was significantly lower in prednisolone-treated patients compared to untreated patients (median 55.40% [percentile range 48.76-67.70] versus 73.34% [65.21-78.92], p = 0.0011, Mann-Whitney test). Similarly, we detected lower levels of sCD14 (3.6 μg/ml [2.78-5.12] vs. 6.11 μg/ml [4.58-7.70]; p = 0.0048), LBP (2.18 ng/ml [1.59-2.87] vs. 3.45 ng/ml [1.84-5.03]; p = 0.0386), suPAR antigen (2.17 μg/ml [1.65-2.81] vs. 2.56 μg/ml [2.24-4.26]; p = 0.0351) and a trend towards lower levels of sCD40L (2.70 pg/ml [1.90-4.00] vs. 3.60 pg/ml [2.95-5.30]; p = 0.0782). Viral load in both groups was similar (0.8 × 105 ng/ml [0.2-42.4 × 105] vs. 1.1 × 105 [0.5-12.2 × 105]; p = 0.3806). No effects attributable to prednisolone were observed when patients receiving HAART in combination with prednisolone were compared to patients who received HAART alone.ConclusionsPatients treated with low-dose prednisolone display significantly lower general immune activation than untreated patients. Further longitudinal studies are required to assess whether treatment with low-dose prednisolone translates into differences in HIV disease progression.

Dataset Information

Both treated and untreated tumors are eliminated by short hairpin RNA-based induction of target-specific immune responses.

Publications

Both treated and untreated tumors are eliminated by short hairpin RNA-based induction of target-specific immune responses.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets