Dataset Information

Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.

ABSTRACT: To investigate and compare the scatter rejection properties and low-contrast performance of the scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR) technique to the slot-scan and conventional full-field digital radiography techniques for chest imaging.A prototype SEDR system was designed and constructed with an a-Se flat-panel (FP) detector to improve image quality in heavily attenuating regions of an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Slot-scanning geometry was used to reject scattered radiation without attenuating primary x rays. The readout scheme of the FP was modified to erase accumulated scatter signals prior to image readout. A 24-segment beam width modulator was developed to regulate x-ray exposures regionally and compensate for the low x-ray flux in heavily attenuating regions. To measure the scatter-to-primary ratios (SPRs), a 2 mm thick lead plate with a 2-D array of aperture holes was used to measure the primary signals, which were then subtracted from those obtained without the lead plate to determine scatter components. A 2-D array of aluminum beads (3 mm in diameter) was used as the low-contrast objects to measure the contrast ratios (CRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for evaluating the low-contrast performance in chest phantom images. A set of two images acquired with the same techniques were subtracted from each other to measure the noise levels. SPRs, CRs, and CNRs of the SEDR images were measured in four anatomical regions of chest phantom images and compared to those of slot-scan images and full-field images acquired with and without antiscatter grid.The percentage reduction of SPR (percentage of SPRs reduced with scatter removal/ rejection methods relative to that for nongrid full-field imaging) averaged over four anatomical regions was measured to be 80%, 83%, and 71% for SEDR, slot-scan, and full-field with grid, respectively. The average CR over four regions was found to improve over that for nongrid full-field imaging by 259%, 279%, and 145% for SEDR, slot-scan, and full-field with grid, respectively. The average CNR over four regions was found to improve over that for nongrid full-field imaging by 201% for SEDR as compared to 133% for the slot-scan technique and 14% for the antiscatter grid method.Both SEDR and slot-scan techniques outperformed the antiscatter grid method used in standard full-field radiography. For imaging with the same effective exposure, the SEDR technique offers no advantage over the slot-scan method in terms of SPRs and CRs. However, it improves CNRs significantly, especially in heavily attenuating regions. The improvement of low-contrast performance may help improve the detection of the lung nodules or other abnormalities and may offer SEDR the potential for dose reduction in chest radiography.

SUBMITTER: Liu X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC3017579 | biostudies-other | 2011 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-other

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWhether digitally recorded lung sounds are associated with radiographic pneumonia or clinical outcomes among children in low-income and middle-income countries is unknown. We sought to address these knowledge gaps.MethodsWe enrolled 1 to 59monthold children hospitalized with pneumonia at eight African and Asian Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health sites in six countries, recorded digital stethoscope lung sounds, obtained chest radiographs, and collected clinical outcomes. Recordings were processed and classified into binary categories positive or negative for adventitial lung sounds. Listening and reading panels classified recordings and radiographs. Recording classification associations with chest radiographs with World Health Organization (WHO)-defined primary endpoint pneumonia (radiographic pneumonia) or mortality were evaluated. We also examined case fatality among risk strata.ResultsAmong children without WHO danger signs, wheezing (without crackles) had a lower adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for radiographic pneumonia (0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.15, 0.82), compared to children with normal recordings. Neither crackle only (no wheeze) (aOR: 2.13, 95% CI: 0.91, 4.96) or any wheeze (with or without crackle) (aOR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.34, 1.15) were associated with radiographic pneumonia. Among children with WHO danger signs no lung recording classification was independently associated with radiographic pneumonia, although trends toward greater odds of radiographic pneumonia were observed among children classified with crackle only (no wheeze) or any wheeze (with or without crackle). Among children without WHO danger signs, those with recorded wheezing had a lower case fatality than those without wheezing (3.8% vs. 9.1%, p = .03).ConclusionsAmong lower risk children without WHO danger signs digitally recorded wheezing is associated with a lower odds for radiographic pneumonia and with lower mortality. Although further research is needed, these data indicate that with further development digital auscultation may eventually contribute to child pneumonia care.

Project description:Purpose To conduct a multi-institutional, multireader study to compare the performance of digital tomosynthesis, dual-energy (DE) imaging, and conventional chest radiography for pulmonary nodule detection and management. Materials and Methods In this binational, institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant prospective study, 158 subjects (43 subjects with normal findings) were enrolled at four institutions. Informed consent was obtained prior to enrollment. Subjects underwent chest computed tomography (CT) and imaging with conventional chest radiography (posteroanterior and lateral), DE imaging, and tomosynthesis with a flat-panel imaging device. Three experienced thoracic radiologists identified true locations of nodules (n = 516, 3-20-mm diameters) with CT and recommended case management by using Fleischner Society guidelines. Five other radiologists marked nodules and indicated case management by using images from conventional chest radiography, conventional chest radiography plus DE imaging, tomosynthesis, and tomosynthesis plus DE imaging. Sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy were measured by using the free-response receiver operating characteristic method and the receiver operating characteristic method for nodule detection and case management, respectively. Results were further analyzed according to nodule diameter categories (3-4 mm, >4 mm to 6 mm, >6 mm to 8 mm, and >8 mm to 20 mm). Results Maximum lesion localization fraction was higher for tomosynthesis than for conventional chest radiography in all nodule size categories (3.55-fold for all nodules, P < .001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.96, 4.15). Case-level sensitivity was higher with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography for all nodules (1.49-fold, P < .001; 95% CI: 1.25, 1.73). Case management decisions showed better overall accuracy with tomosynthesis than with conventional chest radiography, as given by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (1.23-fold, P < .001; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.32). There were no differences in any specificity measures. DE imaging did not significantly affect nodule detection when paired with either conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis. Conclusion Tomosynthesis outperformed conventional chest radiography for lung nodule detection and determination of case management; DE imaging did not show significant differences over conventional chest radiography or tomosynthesis alone. These findings indicate performance likely achievable with a range of reader expertise. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Project description:Applications of volumetric CT (VCT) are hampered by shading and streaking artifacts in the reconstructed images. These artifacts are mainly due to strong x-ray scatter signals accompanied with the large illumination area within one projection, which lead to CT number inaccuracy, image contrast loss and spatial nonuniformity. Although different scatter correction algorithms have been proposed in literature, a standard solution still remains unclear. Measurement-based methods use a beam blocker to acquire scatter samples. These techniques have unrivaled advantages over other existing algorithms in that they are simple and efficient, and achieve high scatter estimation accuracy without prior knowledge of the imaged object. Nevertheless, primary signal loss is inevitable in the scatter measurement, and multiple scans or moving the beam blocker during data acquisition are typically employed to compensate for the missing primary data. In this paper, we propose a new measurement-based scatter correction algorithm without primary compensation for full-fan VCT. An accurate reconstruction is obtained with one single-scan and a stationary x-ray beam blocker, two seemingly incompatible features which enable simple and efficient scatter correction without increase of scan time or patient dose.Based on the CT reconstruction theory, we distribute the blocked data over the projection area where primary signals are considered approximately redundant in a full scan, such that the CT image quality is not degraded even with primary loss. Scatter is then accurately estimated by interpolation and scatter-corrected CT images are obtained using an FDK-based reconstruction algorithm.The proposed method is evaluated using two phantom studies on a tabletop CBCT system. On the Catphan©600 phantom, our approach reduces the reconstruction error from 207 Hounsfield unit (HU) to 9 HU in the selected region of interest, and improves the image contrast by a factor of 2.0 in the high-contrast regions. On an anthropomorphic head phantom, the reconstruction error is reduced from 97 HU to 6 HU in the soft tissue region and image spatial nonuniformity decreases from 27% to 5% after correction.Our method inherits the main advantages of measurement-based methods while avoiding their shortcomings. It has the potential to become a practical scatter correction solution widely implementable on different VCT systems.

Project description:PURPOSE:To evaluate the image quality of low-dose chest digital radiographic images obtained with a new spatial noise reduction algorithm, compared to a conventional de-noising technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In 69 patients, the dose reduction protocol was divided into A, B, and C test groups- 60% (n = 22), 50% (n = 23), and 40% (n = 24) of the baseline dose. In each patient, baseline dose radiographs were obtained with conventional image processing while low-dose images were acquired with new image processing. A set of baseline and low-dose radiographic images per patient was evaluated and scored on a 5-point scale over seven anatomical landmarks (radiolucency of unobscured lung, pulmonary vascularity, trachea, edge of rib, heart border, intervertebral disc space, and pulmonary vessels in the retrocardiac area) and three representative abnormal findings (nodule, consolidation, and interstitial marking) by two thoracic radiologists. A comparison of paired baseline and low-dose images was statistically analyzed using a non-inferiority test based on the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS:In A, B, and C test groups, the mean dose reduction rate of the baseline radiation dose was 63.4%, 53.9%, and 47.8%, respectively. In all test groups, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was less than the non-inferiority margin of 0.5 every seven anatomical landmarks and three representative abnormal findings, which suggested that the image quality of the low-dose image was not inferior to that of the baseline dose image even if the maximum average dose reduction rate was reduced to 47.8% of the baseline dose. CONCLUSION:In our study, an image processing technique integrating a new noise reduction algorithm achieved dose reductions of approximately half without compromising image quality for abnormal lung findings and anatomical landmarks seen on chest radiographs. This feature-preserving, noise reduction algorithm adopted in the proposed engine enables a lower radiation dose boundary for the sake of patient's and radiography technologist's radiation safety in routine clinical practice, in compliance with regulatory guidelines.

Project description:BackgroundSpatially-targeted approaches to screen for tuberculosis (TB) could accelerate TB control in high-burden populations. We aimed to estimate gains in case-finding yield under an adaptive decision-making approach for spatially-targeted, mobile digital chest radiography (dCXR)-based screening in communities with varying levels of TB prevalence.MethodsWe used a Monte-Carlo simulation model to simulate a spatially-targeted screening intervention in 24 communities with TB prevalence estimates derived from a large community-randomized trial. We implemented a Thompson sampling algorithm to allocate screening units based on Bayesian probabilities of local TB prevalence that are continuously updated during weekly screening rounds. Four mobile units for dCXR-based screening and subsequent Xpert Ultra-based testing were allocated among the communities during a 52-week period. We estimated the yield of bacteriologically-confirmed TB per 1000 screenings comparing scenarios of spatially-targeted and untargeted resource allocation.ResultsWe estimated that under the untargeted scenario, an expected 666 (95% uncertainty interval 522-825) TB cases would be detected over one year, equivalent to 8.9 (7.5-10.3) per 1000 individuals screened. Allocating the screening units to the communities with the highest (prior-year) cases notification rates resulted in an expected 760 (617-926) TB cases detected, 10.1 (8.6-11.8) per 1000 screened. Adaptive, spatially-targeted screening resulted in an expected 1241 (995-1502) TB cases detected, 16.5 (14.5-18.7) per 1000 screened. Numbers of dCXR-based screenings needed to detect one additional TB case declined during the first 12-14 weeks as a result of Bayesian learning.ConclusionWe introduce a spatially-targeted screening strategy that could reduce the number of screenings necessary to detect additional TB in high-burden settings and thus improve the efficiency of screening interventions. Empirical trials are needed to determine whether this approach could be successfully implemented.

Dataset Information

Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets